[“Guilty but Mentally Ill vs Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity

Good Essays
What great differences between the two terms of “guilty but mentally ill” vs “not guilty by reason of insanity” The guilty but mentally ill can get the treatment needed in a mental institution but will need to complete the penalty once the treatment is finished. The not guilty by reason of insanity” gets away without serving any penalty and can commit the same crime again or a worst one if not watch carefully.

“Guilty but mentally ill vs Not guilty by reason of insanity” Dina F has pleated “guilty but mentally ill and waived her right to trial. The judge will examine all reports pursuant to the Rules of Criminal Procedure and a hearing will be held to see all evidence submitted by either party to confirm the mental illness. Most probable she will get treatment for her mental disorder and once she has been stabilized and finished her treatment at a mental institution she will go to jail and finish her sentence there.
One legal standard used to determine whether or not a person is “not guilty by reason of insanity” as per the M 'Naghten Rule is that because of their mental illness they either did not know what they were doing was wrong or knew it was wrong but could not control their actions (“enotes.com”)
The repercussions for a defendant who is found “not guilty by reason of insanity” is that he will not go to jail and thus be free to either hurt himself or hurt others again. On the other hand, does that are found “guilty but mentally ill” will be sent to a mental institution and get treatment for their mental illness and once they have completed their treatment they will be sent to jail to finish their term.
Dina for an unknown reason lost her baby on the seventh month of her pregnancy. Because her pregnancy was on term when she lost her baby, we can consider that she began to suffer from post partum depression. The depression could have worsen due to various factors such as using medications, maybe alcohol, lack of attention from her husband and



References: www.pregnancy-info.net www.pitt.edu The jury Expert volume 21, issue 6, nov 2009 [Sta

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    People assume that everyone who commits a crime and pleas insanity is using it as a way to get out of the crime they committed, especially murder. What most do not know is how hard it is to actually be convicted of Insanity. When someone is convicted of insanity, that also does not mean they are off the hook. Most if not all face a longer sentence then if they did not get convicted of insanity. What exactly does insanity mean? “Insanity is the legal term that refers to a mental disease or defect that impairs the reason and or will to control actions.” (Samaha,2015, pg209) There are two cases that I am going to talk about that both plead insanity but both had different results. The case of Andrea Yates and Eddie Ray Routh, two very big cases that happened years apart from each other in Texas…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consider the criminal liability of the defendant in the situation below and consider the defence of insanity to the offences that you find he has committed.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Criminal defense is such an important part of the trial process. The defense is important because it can help the attorney’s client to get little to almost no time in jail or prison. The most important but also difficult part of the process is figuring out what defense to use and what defense not to use. Out of the many defenses that are used, only one stands out: the insanity defense.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When an individual commits a diminishing crime with little to no motivation, there are psychiatrists appointed to the suspect’s case to review their mentality throughout their lifetime in order to detect any instability in their emotions that could have effected their mentality during the crime. In the Andrea Yates case, through careful research, it showed that she had experienced severe depression during the pregnancies of her fourth child. There she was treated and regained her stability, although, after experiencing the same symptoms when her last child was born, she was deemed mentally ill. In this case, she was considered mentally ill and sentenced to a psych ward, even with several faults in her story. One’s mentality is a sensitive case and it is determined by perspective on what exactly someone considers ill so there is no exact proof to someone being insane other than their given symptoms. That brings us back to the argument on whether one should be able to plead insanity. In my opinion, I believe that it should be an option with…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defenses There Legal are three different types of legal defenses I have read about that could be used in court. Therefore, even if you are charged with first-degree premeditated murder, if you use these defenses you will not take the full charge, depending on what the crime was or what defense is used. Three of them that I found interesting were self-defense, insanity claim, and provocation. If a being, applies sensible power against a person who poses a risk of impending bodily harm or fatality, that person then, possibly can be cleared of first-degree murder. To dispute textbook self-defense brings about a thorough acquittal, the risk must be serious and the approachable force must be balanced and sensible. A dispute of flawed self-defense will not result in an overall acquittal, but may result in a conviction on a minor charge, such as manslaughter. Imperfect self-defense occurs when the offender's awareness of the threat is genuine but not reasonable, or if the offender uses more dynamism than is rightfully necessary to calm the threat. The same concepts apply to a similar defense of others disagreements. In stating someone is not guilty due to insanity, the defense is more or less arguing that to a mental deficiency, the person is not proficient of forming the target needed to prove first-degree premeditated murder. The degree varies from state to state to launch an insanity defense, but most examine whether the person understands the criminal nature of his conduct at the time of the offense. Provocation is not naturally a complete justification, but rather can decrease a first-degree murder charge to a manslaughter sentence. Provocation also knocks off-balance proof of intending to argue that the wrongdoer was triggered into a temporary…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the years it has been understood that there exists a great deal of difficulty when attempting to define an individual case of abnormal behavior. Many pros and con’s must be described and studied in order to accurately define, decipher, or explain a particular aspect of the many behavioral abnormalities. Abnormalities as a legal concept can be defined most simply as the definition of insanity given by the judicial system, which makes it a legal term as opposed to a psychological one. Insanities definition differs from one state, city, or jurisdiction to another. In some situations insanity is deemed as whether or not the person fully or correctly understands the complete separation of right from wrong. Other entities may see insanity as whether or not the defendant clearly understands if his or her behavior was actually criminal, or non criminal, or if they were able to or not able to control themselves and their behavior leading up to, or at the time of the act. In some states insanity is not even a viable defense at all.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sane automatism arises where the automatism is caused by an external factor such as hypoglycaemia, concussion caused by a blow to the head, alcohol or drugs. [Quick 1973] Automatism may equally arise due to disease of the mind, this is known as insane automatism which results in a special verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. The defence of non-insane automatism, if successfully pleaded, acts as a complete defence absolving the defendant of all criminal liability. It differs from the defence of insane automatism in that there is no power to detain in a mental hospital neither may any other order be made against the defendant. The defence of non-insane automatism exists where a person commits a crime in circumstances where their actions can be said to be involuntary. This could be where for example an involuntary natural reaction occurs such as sneezing or being chased by a swarm of bees. A finding of non-insane automatism may also exist where the defendant is not conscious of their actions due to an external factor often as a result of medication. The essential difference between insane and non-insane automatism is that for insane automatism the defect of reason must be caused by an internal factor whereas for non-insane automatism the involuntary action must be caused by an external factor.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mental illness can be described in a variety of ways. The American Heritage Dictionary (4th edit., 2000) describes it as: "Any of various conditions characterized by impairment of an individual 's normal cognitive, emotional, or behavioral functioning, and caused by social, psychological, biochemical, genetic, or other factors, such as infection or head trauma. Insanity or mental incompetency is a severe form of mental illness and is addressed separately by the legal system. Inmates who are insane, that is, so out of touch with reality that they do not know right from wrong and cannot understand their punishment or the purpose of it, are exempt from execution. The Supreme Court held in Ford v. Wainwright (477 U.S. 399 (1986)) that executing the insane is unconstitutional. However, if an inmate 's mental competency has been restored, he or she can then be executed. Inmates who are intellectually disabled (mentally retarded) also cannot be executed. Inmates, who are mentally ill, but not insane, have no such exemption.…

    • 1828 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    criminal law

    • 609 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In today’s Justice System, more often than not criminals that get caught think the first thing and that is to plead insanity. Most offenders are repeat offenders. With the repeat offenders they seem to know the law and yet they still decide to break it and are amazed when they get caught. For the insanity plea it is normally used by the defendant, what this means is that the defendant is using the pleas of insanity for a lesser sentence, meaning they don’t understand right from wrong. I will go into more detail in my paper about the insanity in my state.…

    • 609 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Insanity Essay

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In essence, insanity is not something we can place upon someone just by acting differently from us. We have to look at things from a much scrutinized view and take upon whatever the individuals’ situation is into account. If I say someone is insane because he dresses, walks, talks, eats, drinks, or sleeps differently than me, then that same person can say the exact same for me because of the fact that I dress, walk, talk, eat, drink and sleep differently than him. When we observe the “sanity” of a person we must take into account the situation they were raised, the people who raised them, and the environmental and cultural background of it all. If within these guidelines you can still consider…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation, the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom, 2002). Also, additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also be included in the case. The psychological issues will include the defendant’s competency to stand trial, the mental conditions that are relevant in consideration of the sentencing, and competency to waive rights. According to Hugaboom (2002), insanity…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Criminal Defense

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Disease of the mind”, is any illness, disorder, or abnormal condition which impairs the human mind and its functioning. It excludes temporary conditions of alcohol, drugs, hysteria or concussion. People use this as an excuse to criminal liability because mental illness is covered under section 16 of the Criminal Code. The insanity defense prevents a mentally-incapacitated person from being criminally punished. In order to plea insanity, the courts provide a variety of legal test to help determine the mental state of the offender. The most used test is the M’Naghten rule; which states that an offender is insane if mental illness prevents them from knowing the difference between right and wrong. Another test that states like to use is the “irresistible impulse” test. This test states that “If the defendant is suffering from a mental disease that prevents control of personal conduct, he or she may be adjudged not guilty by reason of insanity, even if he or she knows the difference between right and wrong.” Pleading insanity is by no means a “get out of jail free” card. Most offenders that are found not guilty because of insanity are sent to a mental health institution. They are required to be there for a long period of time, most spend longer in the institution than they would have spent in prison if they had been found…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Severely mentally ill individuals may commit horrific crimes. Many believe that these crimes deserve the death penalty; however, others believe that in certain circumstances the mentally ill should be exempt from capital punishment and believe that the punishment is too extreme for those who are not fully aware of committing their crimes. Many mentally ill individuals have been executed and some are currently on death row. All the while, this controversial issue is still being debated on.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we apply the labels ‘mental illness’ and ‘schizophrenic mental disorder to a person, it does not necessarily mean, from a legal standpoint that this person does not know right from wrong. What this term would include would be things like mental deficiencies, like when a person would suffer form hallucinations or other mental diseases and retardation. “In M'Naghten's modern form, a defendant who pleads insanity must prove that at the time of the offense he or she was suffering from a mental disease or disability, such as retardation, so severely as not to know either "the nature and quality of the act" or whether it was right or wrong” (Gibeaut, 2006). So if this person who committed this crime did not understand the crimes consequences, and did not know the difference between right and wrong, this would fall under M'Naghten's rule. In order for someone to use that insanity defense, these aspects had to be present. From the original rule to now, it has been shortened legally to not knowing right from wrong. As far as alcohol cases go; this person knows right form wrong, but because they are intoxicated from alcohol, they acted in a ‘diminished capacity”; they however were not acting out of mental disease.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Serial Killer Research

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A formal definition of legal insanity first was adopted in 1843 and is called the M 'Naghten test; its basic form still is used today. The test outlines that the defense must clearly prove that the accused person was so impaired psychologically as to not understand that the crime was wrong when he or she committed it. Most crime experts believe that serial killers are not insane and are fully aware of their actions at the time that they commit murders. What 's more, serial murderers commit several crimes, so it would follow that they should be proved as insane when planning and committing all the crimes they 're charged with. Some serial killers have been diagnosed as psychopaths, or people who act with total disregard for the rights of others; they can tell the difference between right and wrong, however, so psychopaths aren 't considered insane.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays