Preview

Guerilla Terrorism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2786 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Guerilla Terrorism
MASENO UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF DEVELOPMENT AND STRATEGIC STUDIES

DEPARTMENT: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND DIPLOMACY

COURSE: TERRORISM IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

COURSE CODE: DIR 316

INSTRUCTOR: MR. OWISO MIKE

YEAR OF STUDY: 3RD YEAR, 2ND SEMESTER.

TASK: GROUP WORK

DATE OF SUBMISSION: 23/3/2013

QUESTION: DISCUSS GUERILLA TERRORISM. GROUP MEBERS REG NO SIGNITURE 1. TARI ELIZABETH QABALE DS/0002/010

2. EMMACULATE ADHIAMBO ATIENO DS/3004/010
INTRODUCTION:
Definition
The word Guerrilla means 'little war” in Spanish. It was first used within the English language as early as 1809 to mean a fighter. Up to date it still denotes the specific style of warfare. According to a Canadian Oxford Dictionary, Guerrilla is a diffuse type of war, fought in relatively small formations, against a stronger enemy using military tactics such as ambushes, sabotage, raids, petty warfare, the element of surprise, and extraordinary mobility to dominate a larger and less-mobile traditional army or strike a vulnerable target, and withdraw almost immediately. Mao Zedong, in his 1937 treatise “On Guerilla Warfare”, also defined guerrilla attacks as ones in which small bands struck their enemy by surprise, inflicted a maximum amount of damage in the shortest possible time and retreated in a fast and well-planned fashion so as to repeat such strikes.
Guerrilla warfare is used by the side which is supported by a majority but which possesses a much smaller number of arms for use in defense against oppression. A guerilla fighter is someone who is ready to give his life, not to defend an ideal, but rather to convert it into reality. This forms the basis and the essence of guerrilla fighting.
Historical Background of Guerilla Warfare
The history of guerrilla warfare as an effective tactic for defeating larger enemies dates back most prominently to the Roman Empire, as pillaging and banditry by barbarians ate away at frontier



Bibliography: 1. ROBERT A. LISTON(1977), TERRORISM, 1stEd, P 92 Thomas Nelson Publishers NASHVILLE 2. WALTER LAQUEUR (1977), GUERILA WARFARE; A Historical and Critical Study, P 392 Wiedfeld and Nicolson Publishers, LONDON. 3. WEBSITE ARTICLES a) Distinguishing Terrorism from Guerilla by Allen Finn on March 10 2004-www.marxists.org b) ARIEL MERARI (1993) Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol.5, pp.213-251 Published by Frank Cass, LONDON. c) General Principles of Guerrilla Warfare -http://www.che-lives.com/home/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=4 .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Black Anzac Poem Theme

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This is clearly seen in the poem “Guerrilla War” by W.D Ehrhart, and explains how soldiers can be broken down, and made to see the world differently in war. The first line in this poem is “It’s practically impossible to tell civilians from the Viet Cong”, which gives us the image of some civilians being involved with the Viet Cong, and that the soldiers try not to get the innocents involved in combat. Civilians get caught up in war and get killed, and this statement is used as a justification for killing them; using it as an excuse for civilian fatalities. “Practically impossible”, meaning that soldiers tried to distinguish civilians from enemies, but this was expressed as not possible by the…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Swamp Fox Research Paper

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    What if this is an unnecessary step to winning in combat, that the number of casualties could be greatly limited to a smaller number? Today, hundreds of thousands of people in Joint Task Forces are putting their lives in danger in Afghanistan, Iraq and even the surrounding bodies of water for the greater good. The technique that is frequently used in combat, that dates back to the American Revolution, is called Guerrilla Warfare, and is fought by small teams of four to eight people; these small groups are called Special Forces. Many argue that the use of sniper teams and Special Forces in combat is unethical and even more for unconventional weapons, although unconventional warfare is often the reason to a quick ending war and results in thousands, even millions of lives being saved.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the 1780's, the southern patriots adopted a new attacking style known as guerrilla warfare. Guerrilla warfare was when patriots had small hit-and-run attacks on the British. The best at this style, was Francis Marion. He organized Marion's Brigade, which was a group of guerrilla soldier. This was significant because these surprise attacks disrupted British communication and supply lines. This affected the colonists because they were able to find a quick and effective way of attacking the British in the south.…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite being a small-scale battle it taught American servicemen how difficult it would be to fight a war involving guerilla tactics. The Vietcong used strategies such as digging in behind a row of trees and shrubs, hiding from view, and attacking from that position. The loss of lives on both sides was minor. However, it was apparent that the Viet Cong was more than the South Vietnamese could handle, even with American…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    G is for Guerilla Warfare. This was one of the fighting techniques used in the awr by many soldiers led by Francis Marion. This was significant because this “hit-and-run” technique was a huge contributor to the victory of the Patriots.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guerrillas in Arkansas

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the American Civil War, there were such things called guerrillas. No, I am not talking about the muscular black creatures that hide in the jungle. Though that is exactly how the Confederate independent companies got there name. Where and when did guerrilla warfare begin? Who did it involve? Who were these so called guerrillas and what was there strategy? Did certain Military commanders in Arkansas make an impact on the use of guerrillas? What were the strategies that Federals and Unionists used to stop guerrilla warfare? Daniel Sutherland’s Guerrillas: The Real War In Arkansas explains how partisan fighters helped shape the strategic and tactical patterns of the war. Shows us the reasons men became guerrillas, their roles in the Confederate service, and the guerrilla operations effectiveness.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first real display of guerrilla war tactics was used by Martin after the death of his son. He and his two sons ambushed a group of British soldiers. The soldiers were trapped inside a small road while Martin and his sons hid in the tree lines. They also had the advantage of having high ground and looking down on the enemy which was tremendously helpful when it came to targeting and shooting the soldiers. Another tactic that was considered “uncivilized” by the British is that during the attack, Martin ordered his sons to target the soldiers by rank, and kill them off one by one beginning with the officers. For the British, officers are to be respected and not shot. Probably the most significant proof of “uncivilized” warfare for the British would be Martin’s use of a Cherokee tomahawk. In doing this, he brought savage tools of war into their battle scene. All of these battle tactics used in this attack proved to be successful, taught to joining American troops and were used throughout the war.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “This publication was the fourth of a series on the Army's Professional Military Ethics (PME) that the Army Chief of Staff, General George Casey, started in 2009. General Casey encouraged the Army to think critically about our PME and promote dialog at all levels as we deepen our understanding of what this time-honored source of strength means to the profession today. In his book, Pfaff (2011) explores the cultural values, challenges the Army faces, in a time of persistent irregular conflicts. Pfaff argues that the challenges come from the nature of the conflict. The guerrilla soldiers change the nature of war from forcing your will on your enemy to convincing the enemy to accept your position.” (Pfaff,…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lone Wolf Terrorism

    • 8850 Words
    • 36 Pages

    Crenshaw, M (1988): Theories of terrorism; instrument and organizational approaches. Pg. 13-31. Penn state University Press.…

    • 8850 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forest Warfare

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    The forests provided a good area for guerilla warfare as compared to prior places for the guerillas. Several smaller, relatively unorganized, groups entered the forests. These warriors, who were mainly young men who took the “warrior-oath,” entered the forest to continue their battle against British brutality. The forest provided “safety and protection traditionally afforded by the forest.”(115) Many of these young men were forced to be forest fighters by underground Mau Mau committees or a similar organizations/leaders. They were captured by force to fight. Many of them, having lost their land, entered the forest because of the natural protection provided by the mountains and overall landscape. Another perk for the guerillas of the forest was the food it provided through vegetation and the forest’s animals. Darkness also aided the guerillas. This natural protection helped the guerillas build and organize themselves free from enemy interference. Generally, the guerillas felt safe here, which was a big positive obviously. The several small groups tried to organize but were quite unorganized overall. After 7 months of random violence and battling, these groups decided to band together. They established camp in forests near their home areas to try to protect where they called home. Soon-after, the groups sought a more unified response to the British Counterinsurgency. This allowed way for the Kenya Defense Council. Now, being more organized, they established more organization and structure than they could have…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    “I would prefer to die in honour rather than being caught alive by the enemy” (Towards Liberation 83). V. Prabakaran, leader and founder of the LTTE (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam), said this during an exclusive interview with the magazine the “Sunday.” This statement represents how most Tamil Tigers feel about their fight for freedom. Tamil Tigers are dedicated to dying in battle rather than being caught by the enemy (Sri Lanka military). The Tamil Tigers were founded in May 1979 and they were defeated on May 18, 2009. They are still active, but they are no longer officially recognized as a terrorist organization because they don’t have a base and their leader is dead. They are a national separatist group in Sri Lanka whose ideology can be traced to Marxism, Leninism, and nationalism.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Origin of Terrorism

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    terrorism, the threat or use of violence, often against the civilian population, to achieve political ends. Terrorism involves activities such as assassinations, bombings, random killings, hijackings, and skyjackings. It is used for political, not military, purposes, and by groups too weak to mount open assaults. Terrorism reaches back to ancient Greece and has occurred throughout history. In the 20th cent. acts of terrorism have been associated with the Italian Red Brigades, the Irish Republican Army, the Palestine Liberation Organization, Peru 's Shining Path, and the Weathermen among many groups. It is a modern tool of the alienated and its psychological impact on the public has increased because of extensive coverage by the media. Governments find terrorism difficult to prevent; international agreements to tighten borders or return terrorists for trial…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terrorism

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There is terrorism in certain parts of the world because people do not share the same views as other people there are people who share different religious beliefs so if you do not share their belief they feel you have to be eliminated. People do not talk about the problems that they have with each other they rather kill that person or innocent people to get their point across. Violence never solves anything it just makes the other person want to do something more drastic and so many innocent people die when they did not have to. Sometimes people hate people for no reason if the person is gay or of a different race or they just want that power or status. Osama bin laden wanted that status by letting everyone know he was behind the crime that kill so many Americans I think he should of spend his time behind bars death was too easy for him. The sites where terrorist pick to bomb they have one thing in common a deep rooted hatred for example on July fifth two thousand and two forty one year old hesham Mohamed hadayet open fired on people while they were standing in line at the Israel el al ticket line at the los angelos airport he was armed with a forty five caliber handgun and a nine millimeter handgun he killed two people and wounded four before a security guard killed him he also had a six inch knife in his possession. The mayor of los Angelos at that time believe it was an isolated incident and president bush agreed with him Israel official view the incident differently they said it was at an Israel ticket line so he was connected to some terrorist organization. I do not think laws and procedures or organizations could prevent terrorist’s attacks because as much as you plan something to counterattack terrorism nothing is full proof they can have a different strategies just in case that one does not work. Attackers stormed the United States consulate in Saudi Arabia they over powered the guards at the gate and burned the American flag five of the…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    terrorism

    • 13433 Words
    • 37 Pages

    The recent terror attack in Mumbai was condemned severely by various governments across the world.What is the effect of this attack.??…

    • 13433 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics