Preview

Groupthink

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1082 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Groupthink
There is a person in my department, let’s call her Susan, who is very intimidating in meetings. When we have a discussion or meeting it’s her way or the highway. In meetings there is generally no one who will stand up to her. Let’s have some background for perspective. Susan has been at the company for twenty-five years and knows everything. She is the historian who remembers everyone and everything we have ever tried.
The director of our department recently left for another job. In her place we have an interim director who is not trained to be a manager. So it can be hard for the interim director to rein in the group during a meeting. In one case, we had a meeting to discuss whether we should start implementing a certain process.
…show more content…
She was the one who was here the longest, she knew everything and none of us could stand up to her. We frustratingly discussed her as another meeting went down in flames because of Susan and our cowardice. And really, our leader’s incompetence was a factor too. In the above situation, I can see that there are a couple of different examples of Groupthink occurring. First, Self-Censorship, which is when an individual decides not to say, or do something that may offend someone else. In our case, we didn’t want to get Susan going on a rant because we dared to oppose her. We were afraid of her. Trust me, we had seen it happen when someone clashed with her and it was not pretty.
The second example of Groupthink as Irving Janus identified it is Illusions of Unanimity. In the meeting we all kept silent and in doing so gave Susan the impression that we agreed with her. This is particularly dangerous in some respects because it causes each person to suppress their feelings and to go along with the status quo. We don’t think about the cost of going along with Susan, we only worry about the here and now of arguing with her or disagreeing with her opinion. As Ben Carlson wrote “Be aware of the consequences if/when the group is wrong.” We can’t worry about the consequences if we don’t state our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that the co-secretary that was keeping minutes for the meeting could have been a group observer, but she did not offer feedback to the group on what she was observing. I think that was a missed opportunity in the group.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groupthink is everywhere. It’s in school, companies, fashion and religions places. The benefit from groupthinks in these places to share ideas and to know what everyone thinks about. People who like to sit in group for example, in school or in meeting to solve a problem or to share ideas about some homework or brainstorming, Groupthink will be the best idea for that. Not only in school or company business, but also in fashion and artistic, now many of them like…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phi1101 Study Notes

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Group thinking – we are all members of groups (social classes, religions etc.) and all of these groups, intentionally or not, exert pressure on our views.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Group decision making can be very helpful in getting different thoughts and opinions out of discussion, but also can be dangerous because of groupthink. Groupthink occurs when people avoid individually testing, analyzing, and evaluating facts in order to avoid upsetting the consensus of a group. In effect a conflict occurs whereby some topics are okay to discuss while others are closed often without the group being consciously aware of it. Those who violate the unspoken rules often find themselves being ostracized, alienated and ultimately expelled from the group.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The negative production of this type of Group Think can be confirmed through the Milgram Obedience study. This test was a series of social psychology experiments organized by psychologist Stanley Milgram that measured the willingness of participants to obey an authority figure that directed them to execute acts conflicting with their conscience. In the study, the experimenter orders the teacher (the subject of the experiment) to give painful electric shocks to a learner, who is actually an actor/tape. The teacher believes that for every wrong answer, the learner was undergoing painful electric shocks, although there were no real punishments. After a number of voltage shocks, the actor starts to pretend to be in extreme pain as he bangs on the wall that separates him from the teacher/subject.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groupthink is a form of a phenomenon characterized by members of a group choosing to evaluate consensus and conformity and preservation of the group above other values. In the example of Pennsylvania State University football assistant coach Jerry Sandusky abused children. While Sandusky colleague’s choses to protect him rather than doom Penn State image and program. The decision was based primarily on how group members will react rather than what was at the ethical or professional. Primary groups are very important because they leave a long lasting influence on how we develop our social selves. Charles Horton Cooley said that we belong to primary groups because this groups offers use fulfillment of personal needs of belonging.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to study.com website (2015), a groupthink can simply be defined as an occurrence that gives a group of people a fault verdict or a conclusion a that a group has made that is an ineffective decision whereby it was reached just to appease the spirit of harmony among group members than allowing individuals to act independently and creatively. As alluded on, groupthink blocks individual creativity by ignoring alternatives allowing irrational actions to tale precedence. It happens most when individuals have similar background and the group is refusing external opinions. The result are that the decisions are flawed and they often come at a cost.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bcom 230 Dq

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The term group think is a negative form of group decision-making event. It influences members in a group to base decision-making on bringing harmony to the group rather than making realistic decisions to bring forth issues to the table. As members of a group, we…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The definition of a group is “two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve particular objectives” (Robbins & Judge, 2011, p. 277). As a group, you can either work together well, or poorly. Groups can appoint individual members to certain parts of assignments, or individual tasks and then collaborate later together in a group discussion. This can cause functional or dysfunctional conflict. Functional conflict can be worked through even when individuals have different points of view (conflict). Dysfunctional conflict however, can ruin the integrity of the group and cause extreme conflicts. “One researcher says that the problems of brainstorming demonstrate the problems of groups. If you leave groups to their own devices, he says, they’re going to do a very miserable job” (Robbins & Judge, 2011, p. 278).…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To assure that this situation does not happen again I would start the meeting out the same with voting, but stay focused on the main agenda, and present the main points at the beginning of the meeting. Most of all I would use more persuading techniques. I would analyze all of the evidence…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Group Minds

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Group Minds is a very interesting and informative piece. Author Doris Lessing does a very good job trying to inform people about what is wrong with groups changing your opinion, and the idea that we do not use the information we have to improve ourselves. She offers a lot of good information, including an experiment that adds to her opinion about social groups.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The bombing of Pearl Harbor is an example of Groupthink. The officers at Pearl Harbor had been told that Japan was preparing for an attack, but the officers believed the United States would not be the target. Many of the senior officers at Pearl Harbor did not take heed to the warnings from Washington DC about a possible invasion even though Japanese messages had been intercepted. On 7 December 1941, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. Some individuals were not comfortable with the officer's assumptions of why Japan wouldn't attack U.S. forces at Pearl harbor. Those individuals were more concerned about Japan’s intent than others, but they felt compelled not to speak out. These individuals had caved in to social pressures. They did not want to upset…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groupthink is when the majority of people in a group have the same idea and someone one with a different opinion feels like they must be wrong rather than the whole group. They then follow the group unquestioningly. (Sociology and Social Psych Concepts) In Germany at this time, there was a large quantity of people who agreed with what Hitler said, which made the people who didn’t feel outcast. They would then join the group because they “must be wrong” if they are the only one. Although some people felt like they should help the Jews, the thought of being different from the majority scared them ,so they remained silent.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Janis (1982), groupthink is a condition that occurs when group member’s primary drive is to achieve group satisfaction, resulting in overconfidence and a lack of critical thinking. The group’s desire to strive for consensus overrides their motivation to explore alternative options. Janis identifies a number of specific symptoms of groupthink. Firstly, there is an illusion of invulnerability with excessive optimism and risk-taking. Secondly, the discounting r discrediting of negative feedback which contradicts group consensus results in rationalization in order to explain away any disagreeable information. Next, an unquestioned belief in the inherent morality of the group which leads members to be convinced of the logical correctness of what it is doing and to ignore ethical or moral consequences of decisions. Fourthly, the group’s desire to maintain consensus can lead to negative stereotyping of opponents or people outside the group, or to…

    • 749 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Dangers of Groupthink

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In conclusion, I have been in the groupthink situation recently and perceive cohesiveness was a deterrent. They broke into a smaller group and they picked people they were more familiar. They did not include me because of my differing views. A few months later the…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays