Dr. Wade Lijewski
Throughout history, social groups and primary groups represents individuals who associates a connection with comparable others. Giving a presence of homophily within a group of people who share similarities like age, culture, social status, and even religious beliefs. However, a group never begins with three or four different individuals who have dissimilar views or perspectives. Groups begins with one, two, or three individuals who have different beliefs, views, and opinions. These individuals or individual looks for others that share similarities, so that he or she could join “the cause.” These individuals or individual persuade others to change his or her views to the communicator’s beliefs or views, so he or she could also join the cause. The point of the matter is that groups can influence or persuade others to believe in what the group believes in (Myers, 2010). Such beliefs could cause a positive or negative impact in which its outcome depends on the type of message the group communicates. However, positive groups are still within today’s society that influences others to live life with morals and good values. A group that persuades teens and young adults to join the meetings that changes bad behavior to good behavior, abstinence, and how to live a life without drugs and violence. The group of teens and young adults who calls him or herself “Oasis de Vida Eterna” (Oasis of Eternal Life). The youth group of Oasis of Eternal Life have been around for eight years and dedicates every Friday night to have a meeting. In each meeting the group discusses different topics that pertain to anti-drug use, anti-violence, abstinence, and behavior modification. Even though Oasis of Eternal Life have different groups, such as men’s group, women’s group, teen and young adult group, juvenile group, and child group. The focus of this observation will be on the teen and young adult group. This group has four males, seven females, and an adult of the age of 44 that leads the meeting by teaching on the subject of the week. For the reason that the teens and young adults did not know that an analysis was taking part, the facilitator gave me the ages in groups. For instance, one member is 16, three members are 17. Two members are 20, and one member is 22. Social norms are part of this group of individuals because, according to the facilitator that identifies each member as part of one of the Oasis of Eternal Life’s groups. Each member is not told to behave in a curtain manner, but motivated to act or behave with respect, integrity, and compassion. Motivation is one of the sources to promote good behavior and the only stimuli these teens and young adults receive is some rewards and mostly praise. According to McCord, 1948, research has proven that motivational factors produces positive stimulation, which leads to good behavior. It was noticeable, at the meeting, when a member’s facial expressions was full of enthusiasm and happiness whenever a he or she got praise for his or her good effort. Since most of the member’s homes are full of verbal and physical abuse, he or she feels a sense of satisfaction whenever someone identifies and acknowledges a good effort from his or her behalf. Many of the teens and young adults of this group came out of drug addiction, and became part of the group in search of a better role models and positive influences. Some of these members still struggle with the accusations of people in his or her neighborhood as if they were still drug addicts. Even if the actions of these members are not the same as it was before, he or she became part of the group. According to Bernheim 1994, the public rather rely on an individual’s predispositions instead of the individuals actions. The teachings set for these members helps his or her to behave in accordance to the standards and rules of Oasis of Eternal Life’s teen and young...
References: Bernheim, D. B. (1994). A theory of conformity. Journal of political economy, 102(5), 841-877.
McCord, F. (1948). The evolution of norms. The journal of social psychology, 27(1), 3-15.
Myers, D. (2010). Social psychology (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Weeks, M., & Lupfer, M. B. (2000). Religious attributions and proximity of influence: An investigation of direct intervention and distal explanations. Journal for the scientific study of religion, 39(3), 348-362.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document