Preview

Greek Word Study of Conscience

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1149 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Greek Word Study of Conscience
Greek word study dialégomai, dialogizomai, dialogismos : Conscience
Summary
I. dialégomai
In classical and Hellenistic Greek culture The Greek words dialégomai was usually used for “converse” or “discussion.” In the time of the great philosophers like Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, the art of persuasion and demonstration was developed as well as the establishment of the idea and the investigation of demonstration. In fact, dialégomai is the only way to reach the idea in Greek philosophy, so it is a crucial importance. The word dialégomai means “to confer” or “to negociate” in a speech, in a debate, or an address of problem; sometimes it can even be used for disputing. However, it is strongly differentiated from anagignoskein, which means to give a lecture. It can be translated as simply as “to speak to someone” and “conversation.” Or sometimes according to the author’s intent, it can mean “to treat of something” or ‘to debate with someone”

In the New Testament, there is no instance of the classical use of dialégomai in the philosophical sense. In the sphere of revelation there is no question of reaching the idea through dialectic. What is at issue is the obedient and percipient acceptance of the Word spoken by God, which is not an idea, but the comprehensive declaration of the divine will which sets all life in the light of divine truth. dialégomai occurs in three senses in the New Testament. In the first sense, God “addresses encouragements as to sons;” in the second sense it is used in Paul’s addresses in the assemblies “delivering of religious lectures or sermon;” and in the third sense it indicates “disputing.”

II. dialogizomai A. dialogizomai in the Greek and Hellenistic world
There are two meanings for the Greek word dialogizomai, which is a composite of the dia and logizomai. The first meaning “to reckon” is not found in the New Testament, but can be understood in the sense of “to reckon as”. And the second meaning, “ to consider” in the sense

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Habakkuk

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages

    4. The New Interpreter 's Dictionary of the Bible. Vol. 2. Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 2006. Print. D-H.…

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Outline on Pontius Pilate

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Carson, D. A., and Douglas J. Moo. An Introduction to the New Testament. 2d ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2005.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Ideas of Paulo Freire

    • 2110 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To understand Paulo Freire’s “dialogue” concept, it is important to first understand the difference between the way he is defining dialogue, the definition we usually assign to the word, and the dictionary definition. The definition that is usually associated with dialogue, and the Merriam-Webster dictionary definition of dialogue is “a conversation between two or more people.” This denotation does not divulge what Freire means by dialogue; his connotation of the word is much deeper. Freire explicitly tells us his meaning of the word dialogue is “the encounter between men, mediated by the world, in order to name the world” (Freire 88). He elaborates on his concept with six features of dialogue: love for…

    • 2110 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gorgias, written by Plato at about 380 B.C., is a Socratic dialogue focusing mainly on the aspects of rhetoric, and how it is used. Socrates, the main speaker, is having discourse in Callicles’ home in Athens, Greece. Callicles was an Athenian political philosopher back in those ancient times. The main character of the discourse was Gorgias, who was a Sophist, which meant that he was a teacher of philosophy and rhetoric in Greece. In this dialogue, Socrates engages Gorgias in a discussion concerning rhetoric, and what its fundamental properties were, how it was used, and why.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dialectic Vs Rhetoric

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page

    One more prominent figure in the classical history of rhetoric is Plato (428-347 B.C). Plato believed that the purpose of philosophy was to discover truth that should be independent of any special calculation of interest; he was suspicious of rhetoric because he thought it lacked any concern with a truth that was separate from the speaker’s interest. An opposition therefore developed in the classical period between rhetoric and dialectic (1), dialectic gave equal weight to both sides of an argument, while rhetoric was concerned with persuasion from a particular perspective rather than presenting a balanced point of view. For Plato, rhetoric was deceptive, because it only showed a perspective that fitted with the speaker’s point of view.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exegesis #3 Mark 6:1-11

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Harris, Stephen L. "Part Two: The New Testament." Understanding the Bible. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Pub., 1997. N. pag. Print.…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “He who knows the truth, knows the light, and he who knows it knows eternity.” (171). Saint Augustine explains throughout The Confessions the challenges he faced in search for the divinity truth. The struggles and triumphs Saint Augustine conquered at each level of the Divided Line presented in Plato’s The Republic.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 9 ]. Ernst Jenni and Claus Westermann, editors of Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament (TLOT). 3 vols. Translated by M. E. Biddle. (Peabody: Hendrickson, 1997).…

    • 3700 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both philosophers are concerned with the artist’s ability to have significant impact on others. Both philosophers hold radically different notions of reality. As a result, Plato is antagonistic towards the function of rhetoric in his dialogue Gorgias and ambivalent. Similar to Aristotle, Plato is concerned with the pursuit of truth. Nevertheless, in Plato’s dialogues he views rhetoric as a way to misrepresent truth as he states in his criticism of the sophists.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In ancient Greek society scholars and sophists dedicated much of their time to the investigation of the nature of the mind, finding that one way to enlarge our awareness of ideas, is to enlarge our awareness of words.1 Much of what we know today we owe to ancient societies, and though much of that knowledge is “of little practical use… we should strive to catch their spirit, and imitate their mode of thinking.”2 Rhetorical theories are precisely dated back to the ancient Greek society where rhetoric was defined as “the art of persuasion.”3 Initially, rhetoric dwelt “on the practical consequences of human relations implicit in and generated by orality.”4 It was emphasized that oral person-to-person interactions were much more powerful than written-read…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s Socrates believes in one-to-one and selective communication. Participating in a dialogue means communicating back and fourth so the receiver can ask questions and clarify meanings. Unlike oral communication, the written word is viewed as a sexual act and not private where the writer is active and the reader is passive. This results in the writer having control of the reader. In addition, “souls intertwined in reciprocity” (43), is an idea by Plato’s Socrates that is still relevant today. Peters explains reciprocity as an idea that does not only include the mixing of minds but also a form of physical beauty. While communicating on the same level is important, communication is more efficient when two people…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, a theological confessional approach is based on what one believes to be true. By taking this approach one is more concerned about their actions, the ultimate meaning of life, who God really is, and so forth. This approach to the New Testament results in controversial issues, biased opinions, and many different groups of believers with their own beliefs as seen from the ancient world up to the present modern day. We read about this very diversity in chapter one, for example the Jewish-Christian Adoptionists, Marcionite Christians, Gnostic Christians, and the Proto-Orthodox Christians.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socratic Dialogue

    • 2626 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Write a dramatic dialogue between two or more characters which demonstrates, explores, highlights or questions the themes and concerns of one of thinkers on the course (apart from Socrates, Plato and Aristotle). Follow the Socratic dialogue form of presentation used by Plato.…

    • 2626 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study Guide Module Week 5

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    9. The Greek word pistis (faith) carries a spectrum of meanings in the New Testament. Discuss the various spectrums and detail which nuance is applicable to Eph 2:8–10 (187).…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates contends that the art of oratory reveals the weakness of democratic rule by which the best orator rather than the most knowledgeable can convince the masses without reason or logic. In his dialogue with Gorgias Socrates affirms this claim that a speaker “could…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays