Preview

Grand jury paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
365 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Grand jury paper
Randy Morgan
Intro:
This paper will discuss and explain the pretrial process and also look into the following associated activities. Discuss pretrial detention and the concept of bail-
Explore the right to a preliminary examination and the role of the grand jury
Analyze the prosecutor¿s duty to disclose exculpatory information
Discuss prosecutorial misconduct.

Explore the right to a preliminary examination and the role of the grand jury

A preliminary hearing may not be held in every criminal case in which a "not guilty" plea is entered. Some states conduct preliminary hearings only when a felony is charged, and other states utilize a "grand jury indictment" process in which a designated group of citizens decides whether, based on the government's evidence, the case should proceed to trial. Last but not least, the possibility always exists that any time prior to the preliminary hearing a criminal case will be resolved through a plea bargain between the government and the defendant.

A Grand Jury determines whether there is enough evidence for the trial. Grand juries carry out this duty by examining evidence presented to them by the prosecution, and issuing indictments, or by investigating alleged crimes and issuing, presentments. A grand jury is traditionally larger and more distinguishable from a petit jury, which is used during trial. Both of these are good for both parties because it gives a chance for both parties to see what evidence and figure out how the state is going to proceed. The DA must only present enough evidence to convince a judge that he has enough evidence to go to court. The Defense may not know if the DA has much more damning evidence in the future, so it can be unknown to the Defense and be a guessing game. It offers a chance for a judge or jury to decide if the case merits going to trial, and if it doen't then the defendant is released. But if there is very good evidence, and the Defense realizes that they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Cj227 Unit 4 Project

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since John was in custody, what are the procedural steps the police were required to take once John began to incriminate himself? The police have no obligation to stop John Doe from making any statements. “Excited Utterance” made by a defendant before being questioned are admissible as statements given under Miranda advisement. Once the police begin to question John Doe regarding the theft, then they are required to read or provide Mr. Doe with his Miranda Warnings. Miranda rights (Miranda rule, Miranda warning) n. the requirement set by the U. S. Supreme Court in Miranda v. Alabama (1966) that prior to the time of arrest and any interrogation of a person suspected of a crime, he/she must be told that he/she has: "the right to remain silent, the right to legal counsel, and the right to be told that anything he/she says can be used in court against" him/her. Further, if the accused person confesses to the authorities, the prosecution must prove to the judge that the defendant was informed of them and knowingly waived those rights, before the confession can be introduced in the defendant's criminal trial. The warnings are known as "Miranda Rights" or just "rights." The Miranda rule supposedly prevents self-incrimination in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution. Sometimes there is a question of admissibility of answers to questions made by the defendant before he/she was considered a prime suspect, raising a factual issue as to what is a prime suspect and when does a person become such a suspect?…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    preliminary hearing is held and the magistrate decides if there is probable cause to believe that the…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ocr Law Unit1 Chapter 5

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This will very rarely be the only hearing - only where the person pleads guilty, no further enquiry is needed and the person already has or does not want legal rep.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Supreme Court disagreed with state superior court because the defendant had requested a closed preliminary hearing. They decided that the public has the right to attend pretrial hearings in criminal cases, including preliminary hearings.…

    • 4329 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court System Visuals Team B- David Bruner, Kadeesha Dixon, Robert Holben, and Tyleshia Gilbert June 16, 2014 CJA/204, Introduction to Criminal Justice Linda Fisher-Lewis Major historical developments of the U.S. courts • Probation Act of 1925 • Pretrial Service as an experiment in 1974 • Pretrial Services Act of 1982 Dual Court System • Federal versus State Court Systems • Federal based on United Sates Constitution • State based on State legislature Steps of the Pretrial Process • • • • • • • • • • Arrest and Charge Bail Hearing First Appearance/Obtaining Disclosure Crown Resolution Meeting Judicial Pre-trial Preliminary Inquiry Trial Verdict Sentence Appeal Six Steps Necessary For Appeal • • • • • File a notice of appeals.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A grand jury is a group of jurors who hear testimony for the prosecution's witnesses as well as a statement about the crime from the prosecutor. A grand jury is run mostly by the prosecutor, and although the suspect does have a right to speak at a grand jury hearing, he or she can only be cross-examined by the prosecutor, and the defense attorney plays no role.Most grand juries contain between sixteen and twenty-three jurors.A grand jury is closed to the public.Most grand jury hearings consist only of the witnesses, the jurors and the prosecutor.A grand jury consists of jurors who serve for the period of a court term, which can be up to eighteen months.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every case starts with an alleged crime. In the Sandoval case, the crime was murder. Sandoval was soon put into the system after he was arrested. After the arrest, Sandoval would have been book and then gone to his first appearance hearing where he is informed that he was getting charged with first-degree murder. Next would be the preliminary hearing where the defense would have received an arraignment, formally charging the suspect of the crime and asking what his plea is. Some states do not have a preliminary hearing system so they would use a grand jury system. The defendant can plea guilty, not guilty or no contest. The prosecution must establish probable cause to the judge by showing that a crime occurred and that the accused cause that…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Carl Lee Jury Trial

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There is a thing known as a jury trial process that is supposed to happen in every jury trial case. Although, not followed perfectly in the jury trial of Carl Lee it is followed pretty well for a movie. The jury trial process is as follows; a crime is commited, an investigation is conducted, a warrant is issued, then the arrest is made, once arrested the criminal is booked, then they have their bail hearing. Following the bail hearing the preliminary arraignment happens these are when the informal charges are presented, after that comes the preliminary hearing this is where the court reviews the evidence to make sure there is enough evidence for a case to occur. If there is enough evidence they move on to the formal indictment where the…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United States v Salerno

    • 1109 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The primary issue in this case is whether or not pre-trial detention of a potentially dangerous suspect is punitive making it an unconstitutional deprivation of liberty without due process of the law. The Supreme Court held that the detention of a potentially dangerous suspect is regulatory. Additionally, it was held that when there is sufficient compelling interest, the detention of a dangerous suspect can be justified due to the pending threat the person may cause to society as a result of their release. However, there was dissent in this…

    • 1109 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Brown Debate

    • 799 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sorry, dead wrong. The purpose of a grand jury is only to see if there was probable cause that a crime may have been committed. What evidence is presented is selected by the Prosecutor. There is no defense attorney, no defense presentation. It's not about guilt or innocence, only to see if there's the bare minimum of evidence that there may have been a crime. It's EXACTLY the same barrier as a police officer has in order to stop you, probable cause.…

    • 799 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification CJA 344 October 6, 2014 Johnny Cotton Jury nullification is defined as when juries believe a case is unjust or wrong and may set free a defendant who violated the law. Jury nullification has been an option of a jury in the United States. In the legal system that we use today, jurors have the power to give a non-guilty verdict even when the evidence clearly shows that the defendant is guilty. In cases like this, the jurors decide that the certain laws should not be applied to the particular case or that the laws are unjust for the case. In other cases the jurors may believe that the laws are certainly bias against the defendant to begin with. The 14th amendment in our Constitution promises that all persons no matter race,…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the reasons that grand juries are almost inexistent today is that it is so heavily criticized by so many because the defendant is not represented today in the process. In many cases, the defendant can be easily persuaded by the prosecutor to disclose information that can be very useful, and is likely to be used during the final trial. Because the defendant is not represented, rarely will a grand jury decide against the wishes of the prosecution. Disbarred former Chief Judge of New York, Judge Sol Watchler, was once quoted as saying that it is so easy for the prosecutor to persuade the grand jury to “indict a ham sandwich.” Grand juries are selected by the local prosecutor, and in many occasions jurors have served several times before, and have a proven record to indict. No states have a regulation that will limit the number of grand juries that the prosecutor can assemble before finally getting the indictment he or she wants. Unfortunately, if an indictment is not acquired the first time, the prosecutor can form as many juries as…

    • 2747 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Trial Research Paper

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    High profile cases being spread through the media attracting massive attention. Cases such as the Sean Bell shooting, Amadou Diallo, and these trials were spread all throughout television which sometimes doesn’t fall in the favor of the defendant. There are two types of trials a bench trial also known as a court trail and a jury trial. NYS procedural law 260.10, states that every criminal depending on the crime must be trialed with 12 randomly selected jurors. The bench trial is another term for a judge trial without the jurors. The bench trial is conducted in this fashion; both parties present their evidence or make their opening statement. After the plaintiff finishes presenting his evidence, the defendant presents…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Observation Paper

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The courts have the function of giving the public a chance to present themselves whether to prosecute or defend themselves if any dispute against them rises. It is known to everyone that a court is a place where disputes can be settled while using the right and proper procedures. The court is also the place where a just, fair and unbiased trial can be heard so that it would not cause any disadvantage to either of the party involved in the dispute. The parties are given a chance to represent themselves or to choose to have a legal representative, which is mostly preferred by many. In the Session Court that I attended, the appearance of the court was similar to other courts that I have seen. The judge sat in the center and in the presence of everyone at the front. The interpreter sat in front of the judge and on the right hand side was the witness or victim box and to the left was where the defendant was sat. A police officer was placed on the left side of the defendant to guard the public and those present in the court. There was a divider between where the public sits with those involved with the legal proceedings. As the judge entered the room everybody stood with respect.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The scope of the project relates to analysing the role of judicial control over administrative discretion in the case of preventive detention.…

    • 4327 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics