Preview

Graduation Speech: Shouldn T We Abolish The Death Penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2835 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Graduation Speech: Shouldn T We Abolish The Death Penalty
Name Teacher

Class Date !

Should We or Shouldn't We Abolish the Death Penalty?

The 2014 Boston Marathon is approaching quickly. Last year's marathon, however,

unfortunately had a different ending. Two bombs exploded near the finish line only seconds

apart. The explosion claimed the lives of three; many others were injured that day, as well.

According to Matt Smith, a columnist, the people to blame were two brothers: Dzhokhar

Tsarnaev and Tamerlan Tsarnaev (par. 6). Dzhokahar has been rotting in prison since the event,

while Tamerlan was killed in police chase (Smith par. 5). Approaching the one year anniversary

of the bombing has caused mourning of the lost lives. This, of course, led Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to

be brought up in
…show more content…
With all the studies, there is

no proof that a person's race influences who is put on death row. Most people do not discriminate

Jankowski--! -- 7

those of African American decent. In today's society, all people are treated as equals and are

given the same opportunities. Therefore, supporters of capital punishment, justified by David B.

Muhlhausen, believe lack of racial issue is a major argument.

Both closure for family and lack of racial issue are important arguments, but the

deterrence theory is one of the main arguments from advocates of capital punishment. The

deterrence theory is commonly defined as the increase in punishment causing fewer individuals

from committing a crime. Many studies performed by scholars in law and economist prove the

theory exists. Adam Liptak, a columnist, quotes, "For each inmate put to death, the studies say, 3

to 18 murders are prevented" (par. 2). When executions rise, the crime rate will fall. Those who

oppose the death penalty still believe execution saves'ö lives. Comparing countries can also be

helpful in determining the deterrence theory. Several countries with higher executions have
…show more content…
Throughout the arguments, both early and recent research is provided, which helps

argue their points. All the authors have credibility as well. Most authors are knowledgeable and

have a background in law. One particular author testified against the Supreme Court about the

death penalty. Throughout each paper, there are plenty of logos that have reasoning. The

strengths of the capital punishment supporters are endless.

Today, there seems to be only two sides to an argument, however, most debates have

more than one side. Capital punishment has a third side, which concludes common points among

opponents and supporters of capital punishment. The third side focuses on the situation of the

crime. All characteristic have to be considered. Severity of the crime is one factor that needs

consideration. When the crime is premeditated and the victim is tortured until death then the

criminal should be placed on death row. Also, if countless amounts of people are dead or injured

and society still faces a threat then consideration is needed. However, a person who experienced

much trauma throughout their life causing the murder should not be considered for the death

penalty, commonly referred to as a crime of passion. When performing an execution,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ron Fridell states, "The basic principles of deterrence are that punishments are necessary to deter crime and encourage law abiding behavior. Punishment must also fit the crime with more serious crimes requiring more serious punishments. (61) I agree with the author because capital punishment serves as a device to discourage certain forms of behavior by making the consequences of these actions unpleasant. Capital punishment is acceptable under those terms and it is necessity to the betterment of society. Micheal Kronwetter said, "No other punishment deters men so effectively…as the punishment of death."(19) As an example, murder peaked in 1990 with 2,200 deaths, when New York did not have the death penalty. In 1997, when capital punishment was reinstated the murders for the year totaled 767. Deterrence obviously worked in relation to these crimes. There seems to be a direct relationship between deterrence and the effects of capital…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Finally, there is the issue of the effectiveness and fairness of the death penalty. There have been countless cases to come before the courts, alleging that there are innocent individuals on death row and that this is an act that cannot be reversed if the criminal allegations prove to be untrue. Adding to the issue is that the death penalty costs the state and ultimately society, millions of dollars to process a capital punishment. Most of the offenders on death row, challenge the process at every step of the judicial process and in doing so likely waste considerable resources as often the end result remains the same, barring new evidence.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment is a moral controversy in today’s society. It is the judicial execution of criminals judged guilty of capital offenses by the state, or in other words, the death penalty. The first established death penalty laws can date back to the Eighteenth Century B.C. and the ethical debates towards this issue have existed just as long. There is a constant pro-con debate about this issue, and philosophers like Aristotle and Mill have their own take on this controversy as well. Aristotle is against capital punishment, while Mill believes it is morally permissible.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Apart from a short time in the mid-to-late 20th century when a freeze on capital punishment was ordered by the U.S. Supreme Court, this system of punishment has been in constant use in the United States for most of its history. Proponents and opponents have always been at odds over whether the practice should be continued or abolished completely. Lining up on one side are those who believe that the practice deters crime and is cheaper than warehousing a criminal for life in a maximum-security prison and lining up on the other side are those that believe the practice is inhumane and fraught with inconsistencies which make it antiquated and a barbaric form of punishment. Even though the United States…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    CJA 354 week 1

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Capital punishment has continued to be used as the major punishment for convicted felons for a long time now. However, it has been a subject of controversy in recent years and has been seen as an inhuman mode of punishment in the modern era. This is because of the various legal challenges it faces and the methods used in executing the punishment, which include the use of a firing squad, lethal injections and the electric chair among others. However, those supporting capital punishment argue that revenge is the only way justice can be achieved while those against it see it all wrong for the state to take any citizen’s life (Neubauer and Fradella 391).…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australian society has ultimately rejected the idea of the practice of capital punishment making a return into the Australian law books. However, events such as the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and the Bali bombings have ensured that the spotlight once again shines on the controversial subject. I am in favour of the practice returning to Australia for heinous crimes such as murder, child molestation, serial rapists, and people who commit acts of animal cruelty. This is because:…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jacoby, Jeff. "When Murder is Punished with Death, Fewer Criminals Will Murder." Boston Globe, 26 Aug 2016, pp. K.5. SIRS Issues Researcher, http://sks.sirs.com.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital Punishment has been a topic of debate in America since the 17th century. Although many abiding citizens oppose the death penalty, there are many ways for them to feel this way. However, there are also various supporting reasons for 38 states to consider Capital Punishment as very effective. Some of the pros involved in this long-fought debate are justice, closure for victims’ families, cost of inmates, deterrence, and punishment that is equal to the crime which was committed. In opposition, some of the cons are cost of execution, humanity, morality, religion, and unnecessary pain for the family of the executed prisoner.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    of the guilty, it is a good reason for the death penalty. The theory that…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supporters of the death penalty always say that it is deterrent to crime but after several years of intensive research, 1)there is no proof that the death penalty is more effective than the alternatives. Furthermore the capital punishment is neither a practical nor a cost-efficient punishment. 2) In a detailed study in 2009,criminologists at the University of Texas at Dallas showed the falls information earlier studies provided, claiming that the death penalty had a deterrent effect (Christof Heyns and Juan Mendez). The government's job is it to protect the country’s citizens, but there is only little evidence that the death penalty is a strong deterrent to murder and other crimes. A recent study shows…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After analyzing Ernest Van Den Haag’s case study ‘In Defense of the Death Penalty’, and Hugo A. Bedau’s ‘The Case Against the Death Penalty’, I have conflicting feelings contradict my own analysis. Ernest Van Den Haag breaks down the pros and cons of the death penalty and uses retributivism to justify death penalty and capital punishment, while Hugo A. Bedau’s article is about the inconsistency in capital punishment and in particular on the abolition of practice. Each article states key positions that make my feelings conflicted between both sides, Bedau backs up that the majority of people persecuted fight through several trails after a long period incarcerated with life sentenced to death end up guilty. (Bedau, 243) Van Den Haag key positions reflect in the retributivist statement, “eye for an eye”. (Van Den Haag, 231) I believe in both sides, and in my own opinion there is no solution for middle ground.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Went Out Death Penalty

    • 3200 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The debate over the death penalty appears to have been one of the most argued actions that the justice system has had to decide upon. Which cases are those that will be the ones in which the ultimate penalty is pursued? Does the seeking of the death penalty depend upon the crime that has been committed, the social class of the person that was killed, or the race and monetary value of the person that committed the crime? These are only a small portion of the things that are looked at when someone is for or against the death penalty. And there is no shortage of defenders on either of side of the argument. The debate stems from…

    • 3200 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    People who commit capital offences usually do them intentionally. Thus, they should be punished accordingly. For instance, if a person thinks murdering is justified, he or she should be hanged for just having such a thought. The fact that a person steals the life of another person is just barbaric. Such a person should be treated with the utmost severity and it should be verified that the person…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Putting people to death, judged to have committed certain extremely heinous crimes, is a practice that’s been around for along time. In the later half of the twentieth century, it has become a controversial issue. As a supporter of the death penalty, I consider this to be a good thing for my country and its citizens. Capital punishment deters crime. Statistics prove consisted application of the death penalty deter crime. No executed murdered has ever killed again. For many years, Criminologists have thought to believe the death penalty has no affect as deterrence to homicides. From 1972-1976, a suspension was place on capital punishment. The United States had 9,140 murders in 1960 where 56 people were executed. Nine years Later in 1969 where the United States had zero executions, their were 14,590 murders. After only 2 executions since 1976, murders rised to 23,040. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, It would put fear of capital punishment into the "would be" murderers. A person is less likely to commit a crime if they believe that they will be punished for their criminal act.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "I’m going to uphold the law of the land and let the political consequences be what they may. If it costs me politically, it costs me politically... No case is an easy case... I also keep in mind the victims, and the reason I support the death penalty is because it saves lives. That’s why I support it, and the people of my state support it too."…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays