Government Spying

Satisfactory Essays
Austin Bryan Period-1 http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/news/2006/intell-060101-voa01.htm In some instances, governments believe that it is okay to spy on their citizens in order to preserve their freedom. I personally find this concept to be absurd. Living in a country that’s history is founded upon freedom of its citizens, and escaping oppression of tyrant governments, leaves me very skeptical on this concept. I believe that if the government is spying on its citizens it is actually taking away their freedom rather than preserving it. Living in an era of increasing technology has made it much easier for a government to spy on its citizens. Because of this, it has become a problem in many places around the world.
Think about back in elementary school when you had pen pals from other countries. How would you feel if the government was able to intrude on your personal life just because you made contact abroad? For us in America, a government spying on its citizens sounds pretty crazy right? In 2006 president Bush did just that by enabling a “Government Phone Tap”. President Bush thought in order to preserve citizen’s freedoms that is was justified to tap into people’s phones and emails. The only people that were supposed to be the recipients of phone tapings where those who were making calls abroad, particularly to suspected al-Qaida connections. Not only is this a complete violation of peoples constitutional rights and privacy, but Bush also neglected the need for a warrant in this instance. To this day many immigrants from other countries come to America seeking asylum from oppressive governments. America is supposed to be a safe haven where people’s rights and privacy are protected under the constitution. Acts of government espionage upon its own citizens like this are completely unacceptable. I believe that the only way from a government

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Government Surveillance

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. “(Benjamin Franklin)…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States government has been one of the most supreme governments ever to exist in the world. For years, there has not been a government that can compare to the US government. However, that does not mean that the US government is a perfect one. In fact, many of the government 's tactics are being debated today. For example, after September 11, 2001, the US passed the Patriot Act on October 26, 2001. The term USA Patriot is an acronym which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (Zara Gelsey, p.473). This act allows the FBI to watch what people are doing. The USA Patriot Act gives the government too much power to invade privacy. This act may very well put our futures in jeopardy.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Getting spied on by the government on a daily basis is abnormal. In the novel, “1984” by George Orwell that's exactly what was occurring. The people in this society were always being watched and “big brother” knew what people were doing most of the time. Living in a place like that seems eerie and frightening. In the novel, they repeat this quote which is odd yet true in today's society. The quote is “ war is peace, freedom is slavery and ignore is strength.”…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wiretapping provides the most extreme example of the U.S. government abuse of its powers. For the U.S. government to spy on its own citizens without any consent goes against any right to privacy given to the public by the Constitution. And acts like the "Protect America Act," proposed by President Bush and his supporters to make wiretapping a warrantless procedure, do little to correct the situation (Peter). The U.S. government needs to take responsibility for more of its actions, instead of trying to justify them by making them laws. Terrorism may be a major concern, but U.S. citizens should not have to trade their freedom for safety. Acts like these that encourage spying on citizens only limit Americans' liberties without their knowledge thereof. Ideas like wiretapping are things that should be brought before the general public or at least members of Congress to gain their consent, instead of allowing one branch of the government to proceed unchecked.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The internet is being regulated more and more by governments, but is it a good thing?…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Earlier this month, The New York Times reported that since shortly after the 9/11 terror attacks in 2001 the National Security Agency, whose mission is to monitor the communications of foreigners outside our borders, has been focusing its futuristic spy technology on Americans." The spying that should shock everyone all over the US. Now people cannot even talk on the phone or talk online without some government official spying all over the place. The first amendment is only a tool; if no people use it then the government does not have to follow it. The government wants to protect people by listening to everyone trying to catch terrorists, but it should not be at the cost of freedom. "The electronic eavesdropping was conducted under orders from the president…" The president is a major source to this dilemma. He is taking away the rights of people who are not there to stop him. "The president himself even summoned Times officials to the White House to persuade them not to go ahead with the…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1984 and Privacy

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many Americans are being watched, in great detail, by the government. In its ongoing battle against crime and terrorism, the U.S. has ramped up its surveillance on individuals over the years. As in the book, 1984, by George Orwell, "Big Brother Is Watching You". Many people feel that this surveillance is a major invasion of privacy and a violation of their rights.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    On September 11th of 2001 the United States was attacked. Many people died and through that drama the United States was unified with a singular goal of stopping terrorism. While many people were willing to sacrifice a few freedoms for the greater good, others were asking where is the line between the government fighting terrorism and abusing a situation to expand its dominion over the public. The United States government passed a bill called the PATRIOT Act to simplify procedures, relax rule sets on prosecution and give the government more jurisdiction into the personal lives of the populace by allowing surveillance techniques like roving wire taps and data mining without provocation or court order. While many officials state that this act is a crucial tool in the war on terror, others argue that it is unconstitutional and taking away the freedoms the government is supposed to protect. This difference in opinion has raised the question of how much privacy should the population be willing to give up to support the war on terror. The PATRIOT Act is walking a dangerous line and it would be irresponsible to accept it without research into the pros and cons, which are not equal. Although the act does have a few benefits, it goes too far over that line by giving the far too much power to the government while taking away too many freedoms.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past seven years the Bush administration, possibly longer the U.S government has been monitoring the internet and telephone activity of American citizens in secrecy. Many of the American citizens being monitored have not been convicted of any crime and have caused no suspicion of wrong doing. Despite these circumstances these private citizens are being unlawfully monitored by the U.S government without consent. This scandal has caused a split decision in the American society; whether the U.S. government is justified for their actions, when the secret surveillance began, why and how long it will last, also is government monitoring really a method to protect U.S. citizens and how do citizens feel about this scandal, lastly where is the line drawn and what can citizens do to ensure their voice is heard.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Yes, the government is always justified when immersing itself in the lives of its citizens, as the benefits of this practice will always outweigh its consequences. This question had a very definite answer when great men like George Washington, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock, etc. found our great nation of America: no. Back then, it was very obvious that government should not spy on its own citizens and make decisions for them. This was actually the philosophy that the nation was based off, the Americans were tired of the British government controlling their lives, so they broke free and found the United States of America. But in today’s technologically advancing information age, the question is severely complicated with inventions like the Global Positions System, the World Wide Web, computer chips, the cellular telephone, etc. Of course, there are laws to regulate surveillance on these devices, but the invention of new technologies is passing these laws. As complicated as the question gets, I believe that the government is justified to immerse itself into the private lives and decisions of its citizens for a multitude of reasons. First, government surveillance practices can save lives, put criminals behind bars, or even find missing people, which definitely warrants the need for cellular surveillance. Another example of this justification is that measures like pat downs, body scanners, luggage scanners, and security guards at airports may be inconvenient for the passengers seeking to get on the plane, but will greatly increase the preservation of live on commercial aircraft. The last example to support this argument is in Ender’s Game. Ender had finally realized that the administrators and staff at Battle School controlled everything in his life while he was there. This pushed him to be better than ever (as seen in later in the text) and eventually defeat the Buggers. All in all, the government should have access to citizens’ lives and decisions…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    citizens, and the government would have too much capability to go behind our backs, unnecessarily, and spy on us. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has freely admitted that it has not launched or found any extensive cases through the Patriot Act’s privileges. (Ybarra, n.d.) The question is, though, if they can not find any cases of terrorism, smuggling, or organized crimes what are they doing? The Government is spying on us through every piece of technology that we own. They can find us within the blink of an eye through our cell phones, computers, and bluetooth devices. They can hack into any of our Facebook accounts, emails, internet search browsers. They can view a person through their phone or computer's camera without them even knowing. The government can also turn on your microphones through the same devices and listen to you and what you are doing at any moment. The National Security Agency has put its codes into Android's operating systems, hacking into three quarters of the world's smartphones. (Tyler Durden, July 9th,…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Government Surveillance

    • 5533 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Imagine a world where your every move was being monitored. A dark world where it is no secret who you are, where you have been and who you associate with; now include who you love, who you pray to and what you just ate for dinner. The word privacy doesn’t exist in such world and it is such world that we are heading to.“Big Brother is watching you!” This quote by George Orwell couldn’t have been truer. Every aspect of our lives is being sorted through as Big Data this very moment. Government surveillance has prevailed by the name of security. But, is government surveillance of internet digital communications like social networks, cell phone calls, text messages, and emails really a public service of security? Or is it simply a form of short-term security with long-term dangerous effects to the freedom of the public? How much are we willing to give up in the name of so called security? I believe that the issue of government surveillance of the internet and digital devices is a very important and relevant issue in the current day where more and more, both young and old, are logging in to social media sites, buying cell phones, and depending on services like email and “in the cloud” storage. The government’s exploitation of Internet and digital data is slowly chipping away at our privacy, our civil rights and the future of democracy itself. This issue doesn’t only affect my own privacy but also more than 75% of Americans that use the Internet.…

    • 5533 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA Spying

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The NSA is the United State's security agency. It has many spying capabilities and many people are worried about them. I personally am not that worried about the NSA. The NSA is keeping the United States safe from foreign aggresors and also protecting domestic terrorism. Edward Snowden, a former agenency contractor, leaked some information about the NSA and has gotten people upset about their "rights." They have been breaking people's "rights" since 1952, but back then no one was complaining. Whether people like it or not, they are constantly spying on them. It honestly does not concern me because due to the fact I am not a terrorist or anyone that does harm. If the NSA is invading your "rights," you can try to stop them but in reality, you are doing nothing. Even if the U.S. decides to stop the National Security Agency they will still be spying on you. The NSA is not going to snoop around your emails and look at your "selfies." They are protecting the U.S from foreign and domestic affairs. Even though they missed the bombings recently does not mean it is not useful. If the U.S removed the NSA completely, we would be open to invasion and more affairs. The article is biased and is trying to look at all the bad things. Would you rather have protection in the exchange of your "rights" or would you have no protection in exchange for your life? The NSA makes me feel safe and does not worry me much.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Liberties

    • 819 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Protection of civil liberties and civil rights is conceivably one of the most fundamental political values in American culture. As the Fourth Amendment commends “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The government and the NSA have violated this prestige amendment by not respecting the privacy of innocent Americans throughout the country. Understanding their mentality and how they are handling these situations to protect the nation under certain circumstances is one way to look at this, but also keeping in mind having them wiretap into everything we do is going overboard. With the top secret program the NSA has acquired ‘PRISM’ allows the United States intelligence community to access information from nine internet…

    • 819 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA surveillance

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There has been a ton of controversy surrounding the topic of the NSA. Throughout the history of the United States we have fallen victim to terrorist attacks and we cannot blame the governments desire to be ten steps ahead rather than 10 steps behind. The NSA’s main focus is our safety, they do not exist to infringe on our constitutional rights. Liberty and security go hand-in-hand; one cannot exist without the other.…

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays