Critical Review of Technical Articles
Student Number: 05742897
Student Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Phone Number: 33779939
Mobile Number: 0423494202
The world of information is broad area yet there a specific guidelines which should be followed in any form of text. The purpose of this paper is to critically review 3 different types of text with a common topic: Government policy in regards to renewable energy. The three different articles are:
London Crawling [Kyoto Protocol in the UK] a journal article by Anders Hayden
UK policy for electricity generation from renewable energy a paper in a book by J Doddrell
Britain misses the climate bus an online analysis by Richard Black The above articles will go through an analysis in order to withdraw their good and bad points and possibly suggest ways in which to improve the document.
The first piece analysed is a journal article (Hayden 2005) (Appendix 1). This form of text by nature is highly focused towards the audience of academics. The language involved is of a higher repertoire than the other two articles reviewed. This journal is not as formal as that found in article 2 and with no headings or subheadings; it is the hardest to read of the 3 pieces. However, it is the longest of the 3 articles - which allows it to be the most in depth and comprehensive, again in the form of an academic article.
Whilst there is already one image included in the document, it would be more easily understood and retained by the audience if it had more visual elements incorporated within it. The author (Hayden 2005) has however, included a few links to information relevant to the topic for further reading.
There is a minimal amount of referencing accompanying this document, which is unusual for a journal. Usually journal articles are reviewed before publishing, thus giving some credence and weight to the argument and subject matter of the journal....
Please join StudyMode to read the full document