Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Government - Parole System Does Injustice to the Victim of Crimes

Good Essays
861 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Government - Parole System Does Injustice to the Victim of Crimes
THIS HOUSE BELIEVES THAT PAROLE SYSTEM DOES INJUSTICE TO THE VICTIM OF CRIMES
(GOVERNMENT)
A very good__, I bid to Mr/Madam speaker, honourable adjudicators, just time keepers, Members of the opposition and Members of the house.
Ladies and gentlemen,
I could not help but to listen to the opposition leader’s feeble argument. I could not help to notice that how the opposition has a fragmented view whereby they said that PAROLE SYSTERM DOES NOT INJUSTICE TO THE VICTIM OF CRIMES. The opposition leader said that______________, as a matter of fact__________.
In addition to his rebuttal, I also wish to point out that the government stands by the definition presented by the Prime Minister in spite of how the opposition leader has tried to twist the words in their definition of the motion. We, the government do not see that as true and relevant.
Now I have cleared the air of “confusion” caused by the opposition, kindly allow me to reaffirm the government’s stand before I continue with my case. THE PAROLE SYSTEM IMPOSES INJUSTICE TO VICTIMS OF CRIMES AS IT IS INTERVENING WITH HOW JUSTICE IS SUPPOSED TO BE SERVED ACCORDINGLY. THE PAROLE SYSTEM ACTS AS A LENIENCY THAT FAVOURS INMATES AND FORSAKING CRIME VICTIMS.
Ladies and gentlemen,
Our Prime minister has confidently put forward our first argument. Now kindly allow me to present another two arguments from the government. My first argument is THROUGH THE PAROLE SYSTEM, CRIME OFFENDERS ARE NOT PUNISHED SUFFICIENTLY FOR THE CRIMES THEY HAVE COMMITTED AND THIS IS UNFAIR TO THE VICTIMS.
Ladies and gentlemen,
It is clear that victims of crimes are frequently disappointed by the parole system and can feel alienated and sometimes further victimized by the criminal justice process. It is also the case that victims of crime can feel extremely angry, traumatized and distressed about the crime and the parole given to their offender.The parole system portrays how soft the justice system is on criminals and unfair to victims of crimes. Victims of crimes need respect, support and protection and most importantly, to see that justice is served.
Ladies and gentlemen,
Crimes are violations of communal norms.
Justice is putting the offenders where they belong and that is serving their punishment where they should be and that is in jail. The question is, why does the justice system leniently negotiate for an early release via parole system? Were the victims spared for the trauma that they have experienced? NO! So why should we be soft on these crime offenders?? If they have been put through trials and sentenced for 20 years, then 20 years behind bars it is. Why is the justice system swayed to the convenience of the parole system? This is not justice, this is more of convenience and unfairness!

Ladies and gentlemen, let’s move on to my next arguments that is PAROLE SYSTEM JEOPARDIZES VICTIMS’ SAFETY AND DISRUPTS THEIR DAILY ROUTINE
Ladies and gentlemen,
What happens to victims of crimes once crime offenders are given parole? Have we considered their safety and the possible outcomes?.
Ladies and gentlemen,
All victims of crimes want to feel safe, recover from the day they have suffered and regain control of their lives. Unfortunately, the parole system once again, robs away the sense of security and imposes fear on the victims’ safety. How are we being fair to victims? Are we supposed to sit and pretend that they move on with lives easily? No ladies and gentlemen. The justice system is supposed to create a safe environment by ostracizing these crime offenders away from their victims and the public. Why are we jeopardizing the safety of victims once more and let them re-live the trauma that they struggle to overcome? How could we allow the parole system to exist when we are not able to protect crime victims from a second nightmare? In a stretch of time, their fear will be a hindrance in their daily routine. This is where crime victims suffer lower academic performance, decreased productivity and severe loss of confidence in their work.
Ladies and gentlemen,
The parole system is nothing but a recycling operation. Violent criminals are released early only to commit more violent crimes, to be sent back to prison, only to qualify for parole again. How many more people have to die or be seriously injured by predicate violent felons? How many more families have to suffer because parole boards are callous to society and sympathetic to criminals? We may not be able to prevent crimes, especially horrific crimes, from being committed, but we can see to it that the criminals are suitably punished and ostracized from society.
Ladies and gentlemen,
The arguments that I have presented are enough to prove that parole system does injustice to the victim of crimes.
Before I end allow me to reaffirm the government’s stand. THE PAROLE SYSTEM IMPOSES INJUSTICE TO VICTIMS OF CRIMES AS IT IS INTERVENING WITH HOW JUSTICE IS SUPPOSED TO BE SERVED ACCORDINGLY. INSTEAD OF SERVING JUSTICE, THE PAROLE SYSTEM ACTS AS LENIENCY THAT FAVOURS INMATES AND FORSAKING THE JUSTICE FOR VICTIMS OF CRIMES.
With this I will rest the case. Thank you.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    parole is used for those who are getting or have already been released. The concept gained…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout “Dreams from the Monster Factory,” Sunny introduces many different aspects and dilemmas dealing with the criminal justice system. While reading her book, it truly opened my eyes, and made me realize exactly how prisons are, and how they deal with inmates. This is much different than reading a textbook, which is also beneficial, but Sunny’s book gave personal experiences, feelings, and situations. As a criminal justice student, the book made me relate the information that I am taught in my classes to the dilemmas and situations Sunny dealt with. A major moral dilemma that is becoming more and more prevalent in today’s society is also a key dilemma throughout the book. Sunny’s argument is that the rehabilitation system dealing with the criminal justice is more beneficial and favorable than that of retributive. She was very passionate about this system dealing with the inmates of the prison she worked at.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is a mandatory, life-without-parole sentence just in such circumstances? Remember that “just” may or may not be the same as “constitutional.” Summarize both the pros an...…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Prison Service encompasses three central aims; holding prisoners securely, decrease risk of offending and lastly offer safe, well-ordered institutions in which prisoners are treated humanely, decently and lawfully (Cavadino and Dignan, 2007, p.193). When the state incarcerates, it must accept accountability for the basic care of those it detains. Although prisoners should not expect luxuries during their time of incarceration, they should not be deprived of the basic goods and comforts of life. Certification of access to enough goods should be available to help them develop as the citizens expected to be. Lord Justice Woolf (1991) claimed three necessities for the prison system to maintain steadiness: security, control and justice. In terms…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To understand parole one needs to know what parole is and what it means. Parole is the status and early release of a convicted offender who has been conditionally releases from prison by a paroling authority before his or her sentence is expired. Parole and Probation have similar conditions. While an offender is on parole they have certain rules they need to follow. There is another form of parole which is Federal parole. Federal parole was determined by the Parole Board under the United Stated Parole Commission. Federal parole was changed after the Sentencing Reform Act. The Sentencing Reform Act was a part of the U.S. Federal statute that was intended to increase the consistency in the United States federal sentencing; this abolished federal parole all together. Parole was introduced by Brockway Zebulon in 1876 as a way to reduce jail overcrowding and as a way to rehabilitate offenders by encouraging them to win back their freedom with good behaviors. The role of parole was to reduce prison terms based on good behavior. Another role of probation was to supervise the convicted after being granted parole and grant freedom to those who had uncertain sentences. The reduction of jail terms after good and responsible behavior use to reduce indeterminate sentences. “There are 25 percent of inmates who are freed from prison are still paroled by the paroling authority, such as a parole board” (Schmalleger, F).…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With the decrease of the budget, it has made the parole offices job harder, with fewer people working and less recourse at their disposal. With the increase of caseload, this has created a system where everything is taking to much time by looking at paroles case by case (tt). There needs to be a new system introduced that have a better effect on oversight, control and consistency (tt). There needs to be new policy introduced that bring better community structure that allows the individual to feel a part of society which would stop them to commit a crime. There is the ideology struggle we think incarceration is the best form of punishment this has to change. The parole system does not work most criminal are sent back to prison. There has been…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Parole Board are allowing criminals out on parole to get away with murder, again. Convicts on parole are committing crimes, which range from minor offences to murder, and when their case is reviewed by The Parole Board again The Board are making blatantly incompetent decisions and letting the repeating convicts to go free again to walk among the innocent people in the public. Though the example of the Jill Meagher case I will show you how it is their job to help integrate ex-criminals back into society but it also their responsibility to make sure that they are not impeding the safety of the rest of the public.…

    • 741 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additionally, there is very little support for the parolees. In terms of political support, criminal disenfranchisement, as discussed by Uggen et al., further marginalizes people who are already marginalized and keeps them from being able to make their voices heard. Thus, they are unable to integrate into the…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Due Process Model

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The criminal rights perspective holds that it is probably necessary to allow some guilty people to go free in order not to convict the innocent (Schmallenger, 2003, p.18). This writer disagrees with this statement. The justice system, while not perfect, holds the difficult, if not somewhat impossible, task of separating the guilty from the innocent. Unfortunately, real criminals sometime escape prosecution, while innocent victims are imprisoned. Society is infatuated with crime, its victims, and…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper, I will discuss three forms of injustice or bias in the American corrections system as it applies to differing branches of government and criminal justice. First, intermediate sentencing for non-violent offenders and why it should be expanded. Second, Political bias in the judicial system in regards to light sentences to violent offenders. Lastly, I will discuss the pardon power of the executive branch politicians in our society and how it can be unjust due to bias.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lawanda, I too can appreciate both traditional and restorative justice. Leaders in criminal justice are being confronted with the needs of expanding offender populations while grappling with depreciating budgets. Seeking a more productive and effective medium of managing offenders has led many states to focus on the use of evidence based principles within community corrections agencies with proven methods of reducing offender recidivism (CJI, 2009). Violent and career criminals need to be incapacitated from society; therefore, prisons are a necessity. The foundation of restorative justice is reintegrative shaming and is generally reserved for first time offenders. In our contemporary world justice is not swift and God’s edict admonishes…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tough Crime Approach

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Furthermore, the paper discussed my personal feelings on why I do not think the tough on crime approach to criminal justice is effective. I outlined that the majority of those convicted of crimes were from marginalized groups and that law-abiding tax payers are responsible for funding new legislation and criminals’ prison costs. Finally, the essay mentioned a solution to the problem, such as focusing on a more rehabilitative approach to crime. In conclusion, Harper’s tough on crime approach to criminal justice is negatively affecting society because it ignores the rights of those convicted, and is an excessive cost to the state. Therefore, Canada must enact a rehabilitative approach of criminal justice in order to deter…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parole is by definition the practice of early release of a prisoner from imprisonment who will be subject to conditions set by correctional authorities (Siegel 2014). Although there are some compelling cases that argue for the right for juveniles sentenced to life in prison to be eligible for parole, the Supreme Court ruled in 2011 that there is no absolute right or legal right to receive parole (Swarthout v. Cooke and Cate v. Clay). Furthermore, people who argue that abolishing parole would have a negative effect on society do not have to look much further than the State of Virginia, where violent crime was reduced by 23% since they abolished parole. Criminal sentences should be based on justice, and not on a predictive system that is based…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Justice Policy

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The criminal justice policy I have chosen to talk about is the 2010 – 2015 government policy: reoffending and rehabilitation. I will be analysing the government which was in power when this policy was set out and will also be looking at the impact the policy had on our society. The government’s main aim when looking at policies is to make sure our communities feel safe and secure, policies can both make a change and have a huge effect on our society. I will be exploring the outcomes and limitations of the legislation, also looking at theoretical concepts throughout.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law reforms made during the R v Skaf case led to more just outcomes for future sexually assaulted victims, but the lack of law reforms for sentencing and parole periods does not achieve justice for the victims. The Meagher Case led the public to question the justice system and gave rise to law reform in certain parts of Australia. The “Meagher killer was on parole for sex attacks” media article questions the ability of the Parole Board and the belief of rehabilitation. The Victorian Parole Board however, released a statement “that anybody on parole charged with violent or sex offences would have their parole automatically cancelled.” This minor law reform in Victoria will prove effective as they will disallow criminals with…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays