Preview

Government Entitlements: a Libertarian Point of View?

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1981 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Government Entitlements: a Libertarian Point of View?
The Welfare/Nanny State is a popular discussion that entertains a variety of notions. Views such as the Libertarians’ believe that self-reliance and responsibility are of great importance when referring to government issues. For example, the government’s role is not that of a “Nanny” state in reference to Universal Health Care. Are we to look to our government for complete and unearned help? Does the government have the right to dictate to us when, where, how and how much we are to have, do and enjoy? The Libertarians’ views on this are very simple. Let’s take a look at these points and determine exactly where the Libertarians stand, and determine if the government is stepping over its given powers. First, I will take a look at our government’s right to control our bodies. This would also be in reference to the government’s ability to control the health care of our nation. Our founding fathers believed that “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” was important enough to write in our Declaration of Independence, why? They believed that life was one of our responsibilities as humans to protect. The Declaration of Independence was our document declaring us independent from the tyranny of the British government. We were not declaring these as responsibilities of a new government to rule over, but on the contrary the dependence to control these things on our own. “Thus arises the question of corporal ownership. For Americans, the answer has been settled. Since the terrible bloodletting of the Civil War, and now excepting military service, ownership of one’s body is a matter between the individual and God, with no intermediation by government. Yet assertions are now being made that government should have responsibility for, and thus authority over, the maintenance of our bodies. It necessarily follows that government must have the power to approve or withhold care. This concept collides destructively with the founding principles of individual responsibility


Cited: Anderson, William. “Who owns your body? Under Obamacare, not you.” The Weekly Standard 31 Aug. 2009. General OneFile. Web. 6 Dec. 2010. Retrieved November 24, 2010, from Gale Library Document Number: A206564506 Antle III, W. James. “Welfare State Begets Family Breakdown.” American Partisan 6 May 2002: n. pag. Web. 24 Nov. 2010 Beach, William, and Ratrick Tyrrell. “The Heritage Foundation.” Heritage.org. The Heritage Foundation, 28 June 2010. Web. 7 Dec. 2010 Gondy, Sarah. “When health care is a sacred principle—one Frenchwoman’s thoughts about the U.S. health care system.” Women’s Health Activist Mar.-Apr. 2010: 8+. General OneFile. Web 24 Nov. 2010. Retrieved from Gale Library Document Number: A222315042 Hostetter, E. Ralph. “Today’s Tea Party Tackels Taxation With Representation.” Newsmax 29 Oct. 2010 General OneFile. Web. 24 Nov. 2010. Retrieved from Gale Library Document Number: A241121809 Kennedy, David M. “1933: Anew deal compromised: compromise upon compromise whittled FDR’s dreams down considerably but enabled him to pass his Social Security Act, perhaps the most sweeping social reform of the 20th century.” American Heritage Summer 2010: 26+. General OneFile. Web. 24 Nov. 2010. Retrieved from Gale Library Document Number: A239644903 Tanner, Michael. “On Welfare, an Unlikely Voice of Reason.” National Review Online 24 Nov. 2010: n. pag. Web. 24 Nov. 2010 “That lesson ought to be applied to President Obama’s nomination of Berkley law professor Goodwin Liu to the Ninth Circuit federal appeals court.” National Review 3 May 2010: 8. General OneFile. Web. 24 Nov. 2010. Retrieved from Gale Library Document Number: A224168929 “Repeal: why and how.” National Review 29 Nov. 2010: 14. General OneFile. Web. 6 Dec. 2010. Retrieved from Gale Library Document Number: A242017098

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Social Security Act of 1935, enacted during President Franklin D. Roosevelt, has become a third rail in today’s American society. By third rail, various scholars explain that if a politician these days were to try to alter or change the structure of the law dramatically, then they could essentially destroy their political career. One must understand how the United States gained this transformative law through our country’s history, both the official and non official actors involved in enacting the act, different alternatives to the policy, how it was implemented, and the changes it has faced since 1935. Every step taken from the emerging issue that brought the Social Security Act to life, to the controversies it faces today; have to be…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chernick, H. (2000). Federal Grants and Social Welfare Spending: Do state responses matter? National Tax Journal 53(1), 143-152…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    hca302 template

    • 1807 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Dutton, P. V. (2002). HEALTH CARE IN FRANCE AND THE UNITED STATES: LEARNING FROM EACH OTHER. InTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION. Retrieved September 28, 2014, from http://www.brookings.edu/fp/cusf/analysis/dutton.pdf…

    • 1807 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Everyone would agree that a good health system, above all, must contribute to good health. It is certainly not considered acceptable to protect or improve the average health of the population, if at the same time inequality worsens or remains high because the gain accrues disproportionately to those already enjoying better health. The responsibility of a health care system is also to reduce inequalities to race, gender, social status and religion. While the United States is considered a world leader in almost any category they are judged; however, the US healthcare system remains one of the worst. This analysis will compare the US health system with that of the French. Their health system is worth comparing because they are considered a world leader when it comes to their healthcare system.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sound familiar? This seems to echo the opinions of the opposition to the current healthcare reform law, but in actuality it was said almost 50 years ago by a man who didn’t live long enough to see the current healthcare debate. That man was former president Ronald Reagan, and contrary to what appears to be the case at times, the new healthcare reform is not the first attempt by Congress to bring government involvement into the healthcare sector. There have been advocates for some form of government-involved healthcare since at least 1935, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed into law the Social Security Act. Although there was a push for addressing affordable healthcare coverage for…

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    1996 Welfare Reform

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Our book presentation was based on the book, $2 A Day. In the book, the authors argue that the 1996 welfare reform is incomplete with poor consequences. They argue that the new welfare reform not only cannot help the families in crisis, but also increase the number of individuals that live on only $2 a day. Throughout the book, the authors point out the flaws of the 1996 welfare reform and provide suggestions to modify it. The authors argue when we are trying to help the poor to live off poverty, we have to help them in a supportive way. Having to spend hours, days and weeks to apply and obtain cash assistance from the new welfare program when they are needed will greatly decrease their self-confidence in the society, which is very important…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This puzzling state of affairs results in part from the very success of earlier scholarship. The quality of historical research on the welfare state has encouraged a simple process of borrowing already developed models for the examination of a new environment. I would argue, however, that there are compelling reasons to reject such a straightforward extrapolation, that the new politics of the welfare state is instead quite different from the old. Welfare state expansion involved the enactment of popular policies in a relatively undeveloped interest-group environment. By contrast, welfare state retrenchment generally requires elected [End Page 143] officials to pursue unpopular policies that must withstand the scrutiny of both voters and well-entrenched networks of interest groups. It is…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The welfare system in the United States began when the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) replaced the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program (AFDC) (Rector par.2), the Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training (JOBS) program and the Emergency Assistance (EA) program with the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families program (TANF) (Office par. 1). The highlights of TANF are that recipients are required to participate in work activities such as unsubsidized or subsidized employment, on-the-job training, work experience, and community service for so many hours a week in order to receive benefits and that a person can only receive federal aid for a total of five years in his or her adult lifetime (Office). The three goals of TANF were “(1) to reduce welfare dependence and increase employment; (2) to reduce child poverty; and (3) to reduce illegitimacy and strengthen marriage” (Rector par. 2). Sidonie Squire, the director of the Department of Health and Human Resources, says the number of families on welfare (caseloads) has decreased from 4.41 million families in August 1996 to 1.76 million families in September 2006. 1.6 million fewer children were living in poverty in 2005 than in 1996 (Squire), and the illegitimacy rate only rose one-fourth as fast from 1996 to 2003 as it did before welfare reform (Rector par.38). However, the welfare system hasn’t been effective.…

    • 1898 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this discussion we were suppose to side with either the Conservative side or the Moderate side. The Conservative side had points about the welfare which best described my opinion about welfare. One the other hand the moderate view also had several points to the welfare reform.…

    • 686 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Welfare

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The decade of the 1960s in the United States was a characterized by economic climate of relative prosperity and stability with a number of social welfare programs in place to address the needs of the poor. Persistent poverty continued to be a prevalent concern, however, especially among blacks and minorities. These conditions prompted the federal government to launch the War on Poverty which included an elevation in the definition of poverty as well increased welfare payments. Welfare in the United States can be described as the provision of federal, state and local government programs and services to help alleviate the adverse social and economic conditions and needs of the poor. This help is provided in cash as well as in-kind services through a number and variety of programs such as Medicaid, Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) and the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Program. The development of the liberal social welfare structure in the United States has been through the "pragmatic and incremental" combination of old fashioned tradition and adaptation to meet the needs created through changing social and economic conditions. In the earliest colonial times the social safety net consisted primarily of families, local communities and charitable giving often carried out through religious establishments.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Care Reform

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There is so little contradiction that government should be engaged in one way or another in creating a solution that gives Americans in need of medical assistance the right to life, liberty and the continued pursuit of happiness. The disagreements come in recognizing the failure of government to properly handle other socialized systems, the amount of government oversight that should be imposed, and the coverage that should be part of any comprehensive national healthcare solution.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Welfare

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Welfare is known as financial aid to a person or family. It helps with financial and medical aid, and healthy and secure living. Some people believe that many people and families are abusing welfare and that’s the reason for the ongoing debate on whether welfare should be the government’s responsibility or the individual’s. Apparently “From across the political and ideological spectrum, there is now almost universal acknowledgement that the American social welfare system has been a failure.” (Libertarian National Committee 1). What this means is that our nation’s welfare program has taken a turn for the worst. Many people are depending on the government for food, protection, and medical coverage; even if they don’t exactly need it. People are taking advantage of the fact that there is a program in which you get extra help and life is much more simple, so they trick the government into thinking they need it, even though they most likely don’t.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1991, the prestigious Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall announced his retirement (“Clarence Thomas”, pg. 2). Justice Marshall set the precedent for racial equality in America, putting Clarence Thomas at the opposite end of Marshall’s liberal agenda. At this time, Clarence Thomas was working on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a common “stepping stone” to the U.S. Supreme Court (Clarence Thomas, pg. 2). President Bush had been eager to nominate Thomas to the court, and on July 1, 1991, he afforded him the opportunity (“Clarence Thomas”, pg. 1). This was a chance of a lifetime for Thomas. Once Thomas was nominated concerns began to surface. Would there be backlash from Civil Rights committees for his criticism of the Brown v. the Board of Education (Abramson and Mayer, pg. 117)? The Bork hearings had recently ended, and the politics in the air ran thick. The “war over the Supreme Court” within the last twenty years was never more intense than at Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearings (“Clarence Thomas”, pg. 2).…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Government Spending

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Sorensen, Elaine, and Ariel Halpern. "The Government Must Enforce Child Welfare Payments." Opposing Viewpoints: Welfare. Ed. James Haley. San Diego Green haven Press, 2003. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Thomson Gale. Apollo Group. 29 Aug. 2007…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sowk1001

    • 3455 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Paul W. (1986). In Defence of the Welfare State page 5 ,5,54, Manchester: University Press…

    • 3455 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays