Preview

"Got Milk" Free Speech

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1321 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
"Got Milk" Free Speech
“Got Milk?” A Violation of Free Speech Our history shows that the United States Supreme Court mandated that the First Amendment would not allow the government to force speech on individuals and that it would not prevent individuals from speaking. Even though this amendment appears to be very forthright, there have been numerous free speech issues that violate free speech and are proven to be unconstitutional. A free speech issue that is currently being discussed today has to do with the promotion of milk. The “Got Milk” campaign has been running for almost twenty years and dairy farmers have been required to pay for these advertisements whether they support the advertisements or not. This issue has been enflamed after a “Got Milk” advertisement ran in the 2013 Super Bowl. In the realm of advertising, the Super Bowl ranks as one of the most expensive promotional airing times on television. With over 163 million viewers, a thirty-second advertisement at the Super Bowl would cost around $3.8 million. Unfortunately all dairy farmers are forced to pay for the expenses of these advertisements. The question is; is the government violating freedom of speech by forcing speech through these milk campaigns? These milk advertisements are intended to promote the health benefits that milk provides to consumers. The 2013 Super Bowl commercial featured Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson and his search to find milk. The commercial begins with him looking in the fridge and finding an empty container of milk. He then hurries out of his apartment in search of the milkman and encounters several people that are in desperate need of his assistance. He ignores all pleas for help including a little girl’s cat stuck in a tree, a group robbing a bank, a circus that has broken out on the streets and even an alien invasion. It is not until he gets back to his apartment, serves his little girls’ breakfast, and has a glass of milk for himself that he leaves to start saving the city.


Cited: Magan, M. N. (n.d.). Was the 'got milk? ' 2013 super bowl commercial a violation of free speech?. Retrieved from http://www.policymic.com/articles/24815/was-the-got-milk-2013-super-bowl-commercial-a-violation-of-free-speech Cochran v. veneman. (February, 2004 24). Retrieved from http://www.ij.org/cochran-v-veneman United states v. united foods. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000- 2009/2000/2000_00_276

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUGusa

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    No tort was committed for the advertisement. Although Wiretime, Inc. attempted to gain customers by speaking low of BUGusa, Inc., freedom of speech was practiced by the post of the advertisement. Freedom of speech is allowed just as long as no physical change or physical play is displayed. Politician commercials are a prime example of this sort of advertisement.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the commercial, the football player, Colin Kaepernick, on his arrival to the stadium met an angry mob outside who were raining abusive comments at him…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Jack in the Box commercial begins with Jack, the Ronald McDonald of Jack in the Box, sailing across rough waters with thousands of burgers in tow. Jack suddenly vows to change the flavor palate of the United States with his “Declaration of Delicious.” After allowing a man to sample his burger, Jack’s regiment sprints past him to deliver burgers to more citizens. A bald eagle narrates the scene, which ends with the claim of fresher ingredients. Developed to promote the new burgers and their new taste, Jack in the Box’s commercial focuses on rhetorical strategies and persuasive techniques including juxtaposition, appeals, and allusions to persuade those watching the Super Bowl to try their new burgers.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As Justice Blackmun states in section IV of VA Pharmacy Board v. VA Citizens Consumer Council: “The “idea” he(the pharmacist) wishes to communicate is simply this: ‘I will sell you the X prescription at the Y price’” (p.6). However, the boundaries of commercial speech are unclear as the court focuses on the interest and motive advertiser’s as opposed to simply the content of his speech. There is a sharp contrast of how the first amendment is applied traditionally than its application to commercial speech; the first amendment was created with the implication to be speaker oriented, yet in respect to commercial speech the amendment becomes audience oriented. The audience being society and how it chooses to allocate its resources. This paternalistic approach by the court is exemplified in Justice Blackmun’s…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Going IC advertisement association” Web blog post. Child Abuse. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Sept. 2013.…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On appeal, a collective of insurance trade organizations also argued that excluding institutional advertising expenses from the California insurance premium rate formula violates their First Amendment right “by imposing a content-based penalty on speech.”…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The commercial I choose to do my paper on was a Doritos commercial from Super Bowl XLII. In a Doritos ‘commercial, a man working in his garden becomes suspicious when he sees his Great Dane burying what appears to be the collar of a missing cat. Next thing the man knows he’s staring eye to eye with the pooch, who’s realized his master has caught him getting rid of evidence of a heinous crime. To buy his silence the dog slips his owner a bag of Doritos with a note attached reading ‘You didn’t see nuthin.” The man acknowledges the dog with a smile of agreement and it shows the Doritos logo. The commercial’s punch line comes when the man takes the Doritos inside and happily devours the bag. As he finishes the bag and is scourging for crumbs his wife from another room says ‘Honey, have you seen the cat?’ The man from the kitchen looks up at the sliding glass door to see the Great Dane standing on the other side with another bag of Doritos and says “Nope”. The commercial then ends.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commercial speech is an area of speech that in recent years is starting to gain a great deal of protection under the First Amendment. It has been determined that restrictions on commercial speech be subject to intermediate scrutiny. As a result of commercial speech many food and drug regulations have been invalidated. Commercial speech has recently gone from absolutely no protection under the First Amendment to qualified protection. Commercial speech was limited to promotion of commercial activities. Under the commercial speech doctrine speech does not lose its constitutional protection simply because it appears in a commercial context. Placing want ads in a newspaper is an area of commercial speech that is now protected under this doctrine, however those areas of commercial speech that promote illegal things like employment discrimination is indeed illegal and not protected under the First Amendment.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Commercial speech, such as advertising, is restricted far more extensively than expressions of opinion on religious, political, or other matters.…

    • 6147 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They created a witty slogan that lures you in and then combined it with the bold, black typeface that is centered on a plain white background. This slogan has reached out to all walks of life: no matter their age, race or their economic status. How can two words attract so much fanfare? The answer can be found in the simplicity with which this marketing campaign began. This style of advertising leaves you, the consumer, asking yourself “do I have milk?” The minimalism of this ad has since evolved to include various celebrities, like Cindy Crawford, athletes such as Charles Barkley, and cartoon characters like Garfield sporting a milk mustache, holding a glass of milk, employing the slogan “got milk?” Most include a brief message about the values and benefits of drinking milk as opposed to sodas or sports drinks. Along with printed ads found in magazines, newspaper and on billboards the “got milk?” campaign also uses television ads to broadcast their message.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom of advertising could lay your hands and you should understand what that truly means. Sue Jozui in her excerpt states that using celebrities in advertising is misleading and tricks the viewers into purchasing the product being sold. The author supports her argument by first saying companies using this business strategy, make consumer want to buy products because they transfer approval of the famous person onto the appliance. She continues by explaining how manipulative that is to the audience. Jozi's purpose is to make it know that using celebrities in commercials is an unfair tactic. She does in order to rally an audience to boycott this kind of advertising because she believes it is deceptive. The author uses a disgruntled tone for…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free Speech for Sale

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Under the constitution, every American has the right of free speech, but does free speech matter if no one can hear it? “Free Speech for sale” reveals the painful truth that free speech, and the certainty that one will be heard, is guaranteed only to those who can afford it. And corporations can afford it. Whether through purchasing massive amounts of advertising for political purposes, or by owning the companies that bring people the news, powerful corporations are able to drown out the voices that disagree with them - and it's all perfectly legal. To me, this situation calls into question how true our democracy really is. Are we as the voters receiving the thorough information we need to make decisions? Or are we being fed censored or biased news, and just eating it up without asking any questions?…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stereotypes in the Media

    • 2436 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Bibliography: 1. Freedom of speech that is protected by the First Amendment to the United States of America and by many state constitutions, state and federal laws ( First Amendment wikipedia 2010 par. 1)…

    • 2436 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting thee press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. Restricting the Monkey Juice billboards have raised an important constitutional issue which our company will use in our effort to challenge the ordinance. Because prohibiting the billboards that advertise alcohol is directly regulating speech, then it is safe to say that is directly violate the right of free speech protected by the First Amendment to the U.S Constitution.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Minimum contacts with a jurisdiction are never enough to support jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays