Google Making USupid Analysis

Convenience or Knowledge
While Google can be convenient if you need a quick answer or need to find information at a moment’s notice. , People should not be using google as an easy way out to answer questions because the students knowing this can also use this search engine to cheat on test so they can avoid retaining information. The students of today also do not have a sense of working for their own academic goals, and this is a problem because the students of this generation do not have to think or brainstorm on anything. The article is Google making us stupid is effective because the author gives multiple detailed examples on both sides of the matter. The author of is google making us stupid comes out of the gate with a very relatable
How the author manages to compare his argument to everyday life really captures what modern day technology is doing to the people of this era. He also does a great job of tying problems of today growing from google and the convenience of using it. Then he goes and describes how this new technology benefits him as a writer and a person but also how people become so reliant on this technology. In the article he writes “Research that once required days can now be done it minutes” (Carr 1). By adding little bits like these in his article he still is managing to voice both sides of the argument. Later in the paragraph he shifts back to withholding his argument by saying “Unlike footnotes, to which they are sometimes linked, hyperlinks don’t merely point to related works; they propel you toward them” (Carr 1). Using this he is going back to a point earlier in the story were he explained how getting side tracked is a problem and now by saying this he is pointing that the websites you use help push you away from what you were
Her background includes being a developmental psychologist at Tufts University and the author of Proust and the Squid. She states “We are how we read. The style of reading prompted by the net, a style that puts efficiency and immediacy above all else, may be weakening our capacity for deep reading” (Carr 3). At this point into my evaluation of this article a pattern appeared for all of his add in speakers. For me this was a problem because his argument now appeared repetitive. What this meant for me as the evaluator is that the author was using same old argument that he had been using through this entire article and it was getting old. If wanted to attract more attention if it was up to me you be needing to use a different argument at this point cause already validated the first one all