Preview

Good Things Not Giving Up In The Giver

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
609 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Good Things Not Giving Up In The Giver
Yogi Berra once said, “If the word was perfect, it wouldn’t be.” Having a perfect world would be nice in terms of no war or illness, but at the same time, we would great things, such as family, snow, or love. It isn’t worth giving up your choices to live in a perfect world, because of the good things you would give up also. Giving up the bad means also giving up the good, too.
First of all, in The Giver, the community took away freedoms to protects us from disease and loss, but at the same time, took away many great aspects of life. For instance, the government chooses your spouse, job, and two kids. You can’t touch another outside of your family unit, and know very little about real, strong emotions. There is no color or or music, and almost every decision is made for the people by the Chief Elder. The government got rid of things like weather, color, disease, music, real emotions, and hills were eliminated to create sameness, preventing war and apartness. In their attempt, they got rid of things people would cherish. As the book said, “How could someone not fit in? The community was so meticulously ordered, the choices so carefully made,”
…show more content…
There were speakers in every building, and only the Giver was the only one that could turn his off. Cameras were also in each building, so the government could make sure you were doing what you were supposed to. If you make too many mistakes, you would be released. Lois Lowry wrote, “We gained control of many things. But we had to let go of others.” This means that when they went to sameness, giving up weather, disease, hate, hills and mountains, and differences between people, they lost many things people cherish today. The government also got rid of people making decisions, and decided to just constantly monitor them. This was a bad idea because it was completely getting rid of people’s free will. The government was making all of the decisions for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The theme of freedom is examined in both texts, the giver, and Harrison Bergeron. The giver shows us that freedom is critical to learning and to happiness. We see the consequences of sacrificing freedom for perfect equality. For example, Jonas is selected and forced to become the receiver of memory. He receives a range of memory from the giver and this enables him to question the structure of his community and ultimately the lack of freedom. In comparison to Harrison Bergeron, we see a different way in which the authorities restrict freedom. George has been given an ‘ear radio' that eject uncomfortable sounds every time he has critical thoughts. In both texts, their freedom of choice has been taken away from them.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Giver, The Elders who are the leaders and the members of the government decide on an answer; they choose to let go of the individual right such as freedom of speech and freedom to choose that people had fought for in the past in exchange for the development as a nation which leaves the people without any rights as citizens nor a human being and makes their world a dystopia. The search for what is more important between individual or community good still remains as a mystery for people today and will never have a definite answer. However, this lesson would at least benefit everyone from choosing the wrong…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Freedoms of hair color, religion, sexuality, where they live, the career they want to pursue, etc.. In ‘The Giver’, they don’t have any of that. Every person is more or less the same. They have no self-think, self-worth, or individuality. Everything they do is an instruction starting as early as birth. As said by The Giver in the book, “It’s the choosing that’s important, isn’t it?” Jonas was frustrated that he didn’t have the choice of whether or not he would wear a blue tunic or a red one. The strange thing was, it didn’t really matter to Jonas would color of tunic he wore. It was more important to him about having options to choose from. The freedom of choosing gives one empowerment. The government should not create a society where individuality and the right to choose freely is stripped away. It goes against the constitution, and everything that this brass country symbolizes. America is looked upon by other countries as a free land; a free land with opportunities. By conducting such communities with restrictions on everything, the country won’t be looked upon in a positive manner. Other countries may start something similar because of our country's bad example. This is yet a reason why constructing such communities would…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two of the principal ways in which totalitarian control of a society can be exercised are by controlling the use of language and by restricting memory. Learning the secret history of humanity in the abyss of clouds, on the edge of a city that resembles Washington with its Masonic constructions carried to the extreme of technological "harmony," The Giver shows the use of totalitarian control of the society on the suppressed individuals. The Giver is all about the great public relations ideologues, where ideas have surreptitiously become part of American neoliberal politics. the people must be protected from their own decisions, since it is by definition ignorant: for this, a hyper-efficient technocratic society, led by an elite and enlightened by science and progress is run by eliminating the past that tends to circles).…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Giver By Lois Lowry

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Most of us think that a perfect society would be great. But there are always some flaws to a utopian society. For example, in Lois Lowry’s novel The Giver, people think Release is just sending the people to a new place (freeing), but really, they are being killed. I know because, “He killed it! My father killed it!”…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The great Yogi Berra once said, “If the world was perfect, it wouldn’t be.” A perfect world won’t be perfect without some key objects or qualities. To live in a perfect world, you would need to give up your choices. In my opinion, giving up your choices to live in a perfect world will not be worth it at the end. If we lost our choices, we would lose the vision of seeing color, allowing your parents to choose your name, and knowing your true birthdate.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Giver Pros And Cons

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page

    First, the community in The Giver is a boring and uneventful town in a Utopian society. There are no choices, no feelings, no diversity. Those are key elements on the road to being successful people with the ability to live in their own. Therefore, the Sameness has no real advantages. Think about not having any choice, having no diversity, no feelings. Essentially being brainwashed. Without feelings, there cannot be empathy. Without diversity, there cannot…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The society in The Giver comes down to being a Utopia or a Dystopia. Seeing things from both sides, I conclude that Jonas’s community is a Dystopian society. Not being able to have choices, having citizens unhappy, and keeping people from being independent would not be considered part of a Utopian society.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imagine a world without color, pain, or feelings. It sounds terrible. The Giver is a book about a community that people in the community do not have to be worry about anything. In other words, they never experience the joy of life and success. Jonas’ community is a strict community to avoid negative emotions. However (TRANS), there are many things that citizens are not allowed to do by themselves. The purpose of this paragraph is to contrast the Jonas’ community to our community. First of all, in Jonas’ community everyone lives by the community’s rules. It means their food, their family, their decisions are chosen for them because they are under the community’s control. However, in our community people can make their own decisions and choose their favorite food to eat. Second, in Jonas’s community the Elders control the population. It means that kids are not raised in a house. They are raised in a center for a year and will be given to family, but (TRANS) the Elders are the ones to decide who can be assigned to care for children. However, in our community people have their own children and it does not matter how many children they want to have (INF). Another difference is that when they turn twelve, the children are given a job assignment and start training (GER) for their job, and after that, they work more till they become a responsible adult. By way of contrast, in our community people can start working (GER) whenever they want, and they might want to work (INF) less when they get older (COMP). In conclusion, we would realize that our decisions, emotions, and differences might make our life harder (COMP), so it would be great to be happy with the present life. Never make your life as same as (COMP) Jonas’ community because you are never going to feel the life. A world without color, pain, or feelings should be a destination you would never…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Giver Is A Dystopian

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Giver is an example of dystopian literature, because they don’t allow people to make their own choices. Differences were hated so much that they made them only see black and white. The elders don’t know anything about the real world like war or starvation. The elders control the people of the civilizations food rations. The elders live in a community where when you get too old, or if you don’t comfort yourself as an infant, or if you’re the smaller of twins, or if you want to leave then you are released (killed off).…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clearly the community has, as Don Latham stated in his paper analyzing The Giver, “sacrificed free will, diversity, and individualism in the name of security and sameness” (Latham). No amount of security is worth sacrificing free will, diversity, and individualism. These sacrifices have deprived the community of its right to experience life and live free…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Giver is a dystopian novel that plays out a world with no pain, suffering, and conflict, this world is meant to have total peace and harmony. Jonas is like any other eleven-year-old boy that lives in his community on the surface, until the day he receives his assignment. Jonas is intelligent and perceptive, sometimes even more than his peers. He enjoys experiencing and learning new things, enjoys the freedom of choice, enjoys connecting and learning about other people, and craves human contact within societal limits. Jonas though is not like any other eleven-year-old boy in his community, he has unusual colored eyes, and can see unexplainable things change.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Giver is perceived as a perfect society, but has little bumps that cannot be worked out; a lot like our society, with big bumps that give us our freedom. For instance, in our society motorized vehicles are our main way of transportation; while theirs is a bike. We have the ability to see color and feel deeply, while they have to take a pill every morning to make those feelings (stirrings) and colors go away. In my opinion, and apparently also to Lois Lowry as this was the main point of her book, the biggest difference is the everyday citizens ability to hold and remember things. This is the need for a Receiver, to hold and keep the memories safe from the rest of the people.…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom In The Giver

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the society The Giver the Founders of the Community wanted there to be no pain and suffering. Pain and suffering makes death because in Jonas’s experience of war “… he lay there in the fearsome stench for hours, listened to the men and animals die, and learned…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the book Giver by luis Lois Lowry has the theme of importance of the individuality. Jonas’s community is planned elaborately, and supposed to be perfect with none of dangerous accidents or risks. Life in that community should be perfect according to the Committee of Elders.There is no freedom of choice in the community or creativity. Everyone has to live how the community has designed for him or her. Emotions, feelings, personalities, and uniqueness of an individuality are forbidden, everyone should be the same and ‘perfect’. This book shows the value of the individuality, and how it effects to the individual's, family unit, and the society as a whole.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays