Preview

Good Faith Exception Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
225 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Good Faith Exception Analysis
Our Fourth Amendment rights prohibit unlawful searches and seizures, but do not state how evidence that is obtained from searches can be used. In 1914 with the case of Weeks vs. United States, the court ruled that illegally obtained evidence can not be used in federal cases. The above sentence is known as the Exclusionary Rule. Our lesson notes explain that the Exclusionary rule states, “that any evidence obtained from an illegal search must be excluded from criminal proceedings on the basis of the Fourth Amendment, as well as the Fifth Amendment's provision against self-incrimination, though more court rulings allow for a “good faith exception” to the Exclusionary Rule (Rio Salado, 2017).”
I do agree with the concept of a Good Faith Exception
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Duties Of Citizenship In America
    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Duties Of Citizenship In America

    4th Amendment protects your right against unreasonable search and seizure of property, papers, or people without valid probable cause…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Govt201 Unit 1 Amendment
    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Govt201 Unit 1 Amendment

    4th Amendment - Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause as determined by a neutral judge or magistrate…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did the government go too far
    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Did the government go too far

    Over time, technology has impacted the police and other law enforcement agencies with new devices for gathering evidence. These new tools have caused constitutional questions to surface. One particular case in Oregon of an individual (DLK) aroused such question. DLK was suspected of growing marijuana inside of his home. Agents used a thermal imager to scan DLK’s residence form the outside. The results indicated heat, just like the kind that is generated by special lights used for growing marijuana indoors. Constructed by the scan, a judge issued a search warrant. A warrant – a legal paper authorizing a search – cannot be issued unless there is a cause, and a probable cause must be sworn to by the police officer or prosecutor and approved by a judge. A warrant must describe what is being searched and what will be seized. 100 marijuana plants were found finalizing the arrest of DLK; however, did the scan violate DLK’s Fourth Amendment rights? The Fourth Amendment states, “The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall be issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Constitution). This amendment touches on the expectation of privacy in your home and person. The government is not unable to search you, your home, your belongings, or take your belongings, also known as a seizure, without a good reason. A person’s Fourth Amendment rights may at times seem to delay the world of law enforcement. If the police feel that they have…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Unit 3 Assignment: Fourth Amendment Exceptions Summary
    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page

    Unit 3 Assignment: Fourth Amendment Exceptions Summary

    The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution requires that no search or seizure shall be carried out unless a warrant has been issued. The exceptions are: searches with consent, frisks, plain feel/plain view, incident to arrest, automobile exceptions, exigent circumstances and open fields, abandoned property and public place exceptions (Harr, Hess, 2006, p. 219).…

    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Case Study: Reasonable Suspicion
    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Case Study: Reasonable Suspicion

    Question 1. Did Officer Smith have reasonable suspicion to make the initial stop of this vehicle?…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Exclusionary Rule And Civil Liability Case Study
    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule And Civil Liability Case Study

    In 1914, Weeks v. United States was decided by the Supreme Court. In Weeks, the Court made a landmark decision relating to illegal search and seizure by law enforcement called the Exclusionary Rule. The Exclusionary Rule provided that evidence “illegally seized by law enforcement officers in violation of a suspect’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures cannot be used against the suspect in a criminal prosecution.” (Exclusionary Rule, 2010, p. 287). However, it was not until the 1961 case of Mapp v. Ohio that the Court made the Exclusionary Rule binding on the states…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule: Illegal Search And Seizure
    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page

    Exclusionary Rule: Illegal Search And Seizure

    To protect the American peoples 4th Amendment right “against unreasonable searches and seizures” from law enforcement using illegally seized evidence in a criminal trial against them, the exclusionary rule was created. The U.S. Supreme Court deemed any evidence illegally obtained inadmissible in a criminal trial, and any other evidence obtained during an illegal search and seizure inadmissible as well. This is known as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Exclusionary Rule In The Justice System
    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of The Exclusionary Rule In The Justice System

    Supreme Court & Exclusionary rule In the case of Davis v. The United States, the supreme court revisited the exclusionary rule to examine the law enforcement's method of obtaining evidence. The exclusionary rule also covers the Fifth Amendment, which protects against self-incrimination. As stated in lesson 4, “The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to prevent illegal police conduct and to penalize overzealous police officers for illegal searches and seizures” (Rio Salado College, n.d., Role of the Prosecutor and Alternatives to Prosecution). The rule protects individuals from unlawful government conduct and protects them from self-incrimination. The Supreme Court revisited the good faith exception where evidence obtained by law enforcement officers in reasonable reliance on a search warrant that is invalid could later be admissible in court.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Are The Four Alternative Remedies For The Exclusionary Rule
    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What Are The Four Alternative Remedies For The Exclusionary Rule

    The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to exclude evidence obtained in violation of a criminal defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. It is also a right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures by the Fourth Amendment. Some exceptions of the exclusionary rule is barring the use at trial of evidence obtained pursuant to an unlawful search and seizure. Some other exceptions to the exclusionary rule are: (1) a second, unpoisoned/untainted source had a major rule in finding the evidence, (2) the evidence would have been discovered…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Violations
    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page

    Exclusionary Rule Violations

    When law enforcement or an government agency take it upon themselves to enter someone home or search a vehicle without a valid search warrant they are violating that persons Fourth Amendment rights against unlawful search and seizure. Evidence that could be admissible in a case may be excluded from trial if it is gather as a resulted from an illegal search or some other constitutional violation. The exclusionary rule prevents the use of most evidence gathered illegally. The rule can also be triggered by law enforcement violations of a person’s Fifth or Sixth Amendments right as well. I feel that is the case as it contains to John Smith and the search of his…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule
    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule

    Evidence gathered in violation of the Fourth Amendment is not admissible in a criminal trial against the defendant.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Policing and the Constitution
    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Policing and the Constitution

    The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution states: Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause. This amendment impacts law enforcement because police need a warrant to make arrests and searches. This is not applicable if the officer has first-hand knowledge of an event and the evidence is likely to be destroyed or the subject will abscond if time is taken to get a warrant. If a warrantless search is made by the police that should have been made only after a warrant was issued, then all knowledge gained by that evidence is not allowed in testimony.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Arguments Against The Fourth Amendment
    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arguments Against The Fourth Amendment

    The Fourth Amendment provides that “no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”. Its purpose to ensure each search or seizure be cleared in advance by a judge and that to get a warrant the government must show “probable cause”, a certain level of suspicion of criminal activity, to justify the search or seizure.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Of The Katz Case Of Katz V. United States
    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page

    Analysis Of The Katz Case Of Katz V. United States

    According the Fourth Amendment, “protection applies only to situations where an individual has a subjective expectation of private that society willingly recognizes as reasonable” (Maras, 2015, p. 84). Thanks to the decision in the Katz v. United States case, the “reasonable expectation of privacy” test is used to established when law enforcement are allowed to conduct a search that does not violate one’s privacy (Maras, 2015). Information that is meant to be private and is contained in technology devices can be protected under the Fourth Amendment because the person’s intentions are to keep the information from the public (Maras, 2015). For example, in the Katz case there was a phone conversation that was admitted as evidence, but later found…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On The Fourth Amendment
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On The Fourth Amendment

    It is common for a search to be defined as any action by government officials, which involves seeking for indication of a violation of law. Nonetheless, according to the Court’s cases, a search ensues when there is a physical invasion into one of the “constitutionally protected areas” which can be associated with the Fourth Amendment: persons, papers and effects (Whitebread and Slobogin, 120). Silverman vs United States (1961) exemplify how searches have conditions. Evidence officers gathered by eavesdropping on…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More