God Does Exist
This paper argues that St. Thomas Aquinas has a better argument for the existence of god. He says it is possible to prove that the traditional God exist. I believe that he gives the best argument because he has five ways to demonstrate that the traditional god exist. The statements are the cosmological and teleological arguments for the existence of God. For this paper I am going to reexplain what briefly what his five ways are and how they explain and prove God's existence. Also I will reference Aslem's Ontological argument, Pascals wager, and how “religious experience” could prove this argument. Also there will be a section that demonstrates my views on other philosophers arguments that contradict what Aquinas is saying in his.
St. Thomas Aquinas did his best to prove that God is existent among the people and he is real. The first thing he argues is the argument of motion. He believes that every motion someone or something does is done by God. God is known as the “first mover” because everything is moved for a purpose and god is the only one who knows that purpose. The second way that he argues is that God is from the Nature of efficient cause. In the world of sensible things we find out there is an order of efficient causes. There is an order of efficient causes, the cause of the intermediate cause, the intermediate cause of the ultimate cause, whether the intermediate cause can be several, or the only. God is known to be the first efficient cause. The Third argument is about possibility and necessity. It is hard to tell now days what things are real or “whats possible to be and not to be”. Things are know to be generated and corrupted which has people believing that there world is “not to be”. He says we cant do anything but admit the existence of some being having itself its own necessity and not receive any help from any other being, but helping others with there necessities. Fourth way, there are less good, true, noble, and the like in...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document