Gmat Essay
The best way to preserve the natural environment is to impose penalties—whether fines,imprisonment, or other punishments—on those who are most responsible for polluting or otherwise damaging it
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
Some people may say there is no intervention of the government in protecting our environment.While other may say there has to be a central authority to correct human errors which are causing irrepairable damage to our natural surroundings.I agree with the later one and to prove my point i would like to point out few facts.
Primarily, Technology and science have gained so much importance recently that these innovations are evolving a new lifestyle.While we are leaning towards more technical world we are neglecting the amount of destruction we are causing to our planet earth.For instance, Making of nuclear weapons.Nuclear plants are dangerous not only for human beings but for other animals too.It emitts tons of harmful substance which cause health hazards.
Another example we have is the blast in the chernobyl reactor in the 80's.It released large number of radioactive chemicals in the atmosphere causing unstopable pollution.It took away thousands of life and left an example of how dangerous it can be to harm nature?Individuals do not understand what damaging effect an unbalanced nature can bring on humal life .So government has to impose some laws to guide our safety and the natural resources.
Furthermore an individual is a selfish person and will try to ignore the harmful consequences and so government restiction should be enforced to control such deeds.If one who does pollute is not fined or punished than it might exite other to cause further damage.So one should think about long-term result of our actions.History has given us several examples to prove its power
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
Some people may say there is no intervention of the government in protecting our environment.While other may say there has to be a central authority to correct human errors which are causing irrepairable damage to our natural surroundings.I agree with the later one and to prove my point i would like to point out few facts.
Primarily, Technology and science have gained so much importance recently that these innovations are evolving a new lifestyle.While we are leaning towards more technical world we are neglecting the amount of destruction we are causing to our planet earth.For instance, Making of nuclear weapons.Nuclear plants are dangerous not only for human beings but for other animals too.It emitts tons of harmful substance which cause health hazards.
Another example we have is the blast in the chernobyl reactor in the 80's.It released large number of radioactive chemicals in the atmosphere causing unstopable pollution.It took away thousands of life and left an example of how dangerous it can be to harm nature?Individuals do not understand what damaging effect an unbalanced nature can bring on humal life .So government has to impose some laws to guide our safety and the natural resources.
Furthermore an individual is a selfish person and will try to ignore the harmful consequences and so government restiction should be enforced to control such deeds.If one who does pollute is not fined or punished than it might exite other to cause further damage.So one should think about long-term result of our actions.History has given us several examples to prove its power