A society's or societies' language or speech pattern cannot be easily influenced or changed considering the fact that the society or societies in question are still in their territory. It is in this type of settings that the futility is more manifest. On the other hand, once a society or group of individuals are taken away from their territory they will, inadvertently, become heavily influenced if not entirely changed when it comes to their language, culture and history no matter how proud they are. A prime example would be the early African men and women uprooted from Africa and sent to different parts of the world. They ended up becoming heavily influenced by the cultures, languages and histories of the places they ended up being taken …show more content…
have drilled and instilled in the societies or colonies that they conquered, the belief that any other language - whether indigenous or coined from two languages-is inferior. This brings about an inner fear in the recessive culture, cultures or societies, that they are inadequate for speaking those languages. They end up projecting double standards about themselves. Double standards that come from the embarrassment of speaking the so-called inferior language and as such English is chosen over it (Chicano Spanish or any other recessive culture or language) and the fact that they want to outdo or outshine each other when it comes down to who is much better attuned to the indigenous culture or language. They "often with mexicanas y latinas we'll speak English as a neutral language. Even among Chicanas we tend to speak English at parties or conferences. Yet, at the same time we're afraid the other will think we're agrigandas because we don't speak Spanish. We oppress each other trying to out Chicano each other, vying to be the real' Chicanas, to speak like Chicanos.