Global Wireless Evoting

Report of the National Workshop on Internet Voting:
Issues and Research Agenda

March 2001
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
Conducted in cooperation with the University of Maryland and hosted by the Freedom Forum
I NT E RN ET
P O L IC Y
I NS T IT U TE

INTERNET
POLICY
INSTITUTE

Report of the National Workshop on Internet Voting:
Issues and Research Agenda
March 2001

Sponsored by the National Science Foundation

Conducted in cooperation with the University of Maryland and hosted by the Freedom Forum

The Internet Policy Institute
The Internet Policy Institute (IPI) is the nation’s first independent, nonprofit research and educational institute created exclusively to provide objective, high-quality analysis and outreach on economic, social and policy issues affecting and affected by the global development and use of the Internet.
IPI is nonpartisan and does not lobby or otherwise actively advocate or represent the interests of businesses, associations, policy makers or others. A primary role for the Institute is as a forum for independent research, discussion, debate, and consensus building. http://www.internetpolicy.org The University of Maryland, College Park
The University of Maryland, College Park is a public research university, the flagship campus of the
University System of Maryland, and the original 1862 land grant institution in Maryland. The
University of Maryland is committed to achieving excellence as the state 's primary center for research and graduate education and as the institution of choice for undergraduate students of exceptional ability. http://www.umd.edu The Freedom Forum
The Freedom Forum, based in Arlington, Va., is a nonpartisan, international foundation dedicated to free press, free speech and free spirit for all people. The foundation focuses on four main priorities: the Newseum, First Amendment issues, newsroom diversity and world press freedom.
http://www.freedomforum.org

References: The Caltech/MIT Voting Project (February 2001). Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler. “The Likely Consequences of Internet Voting for Political Representation.” (September 2000) (1986): 52–62. (January 2000) . Canada. Elections Canada. Technology and the Voting Process. (June 1998) . Canada. Elections Canada. “Technology in the Electoral Process.” Electoral Insight 2:1 (June 2000) . Science (October 1985): 372–382. Craft, Paul. “Internet Voting: Spurring or Corrupting Democracy?” (April 2000) . Cranor, Lorrie Faith. “Voting After Florida: No Easy Answers.” (December 2000) . Elliott, David M. “Examining Internet Voting in Washington.” (2000) . Hoffman, Lance. “Internet Voting: Will It Spur or Corrupt Democracy?” (2000) . Jefferson, David, and Deborah M. Phillips. “Is Internet Voting Safe?” (2000) . Jones, Douglas W. “Evaluating Voting Technology.” (January 2001) . Jones, Douglas W. “E-Voting—Prospects and Problems.” (April 2000) . Mann, Irwin. “Open Voting Systems.” (March 1993) . Neumann, Peter G. “Risks in Computerized Elections.” Inside Risks, 5, CACM 33, 11, (November 1990): 170. Neumann, Peter G. “Security Criteria for Electronic Voting.” 16th National Computer Security Conference (September 1993) . Newkirk, M. Glenn. “From Dark Corner to DOT-COM: The Road Ahead for Online Voting.” (July 2000) . Peralta, Rene. “Voting Over the Internet.” (April 2000)