Preview

Ginger Billups: A Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
101 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ginger Billups: A Case Study
On Friday, 9-11-2015, at approximately 1655hrs, I talked to Ginger Billups at her residence. I read Ginger Billups her Miranda rights at approximately 1657hrs. I asked Ginger Billups if she requested Richard McPheter to buy her methamphetamine. Ginger Billups advised that was a lie. I asked Ginger Billups if she allowed Richard McPheter to use her debit card to get cash out of an ATM to buy methamphetamine. Ginger Billups advised she let Richard McPheter use her debit card once to buy groceries at Save A Lot, not to buy her methamphetamine. Billups filled out a voluntary statement which is
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Search Of Arson Sight Without A Warrant: Case Study
    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Search Of Arson Sight Without A Warrant: Case Study

    Urging him to sign a search warrant he finally gives in and signs it. They search his apartment and seize a marijuana plant and some drug paraphernalia. Smith I then charged with manufacture of a controlled substance.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gordon Haywards Case Study
    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gordon Haywards Case Study

    CLEVELAND -- Celtics forward Gordon Hayward was stretchered off the floor in Cleveland after suffering a horrific-looking ankle injury a little more than five minutes into his Boston debut Tuesday night.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Delliouse Case Summary
    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Delliouse Case Summary

    During surveillance on that home, Whatney observed a group of men with the logo “Pianos Unlimited” on their shirts unloading a truck with that same logo. Whatney obtained a search warrant from the magistrate to search Defendant’s Asheville home and surrounding curtilage. Defendant was not at the home so Whatney forced the front door open and searched the premises. Ten thousand grams of cocaine were found in the basement. After searching around Defendant’s home, Whatney noticed a break in the trees where an unpaved trail was found that led to a trailer around thirty-five yards from the house. Whatney believed it was Defendant’s guest home and under the scope of the warrant. The inside was not visible through the windows, and the door was closed but not locked. He entered and found the body of Dellouise, who was part of the Delliouse crime family. A gun shot to the head killed him. After Defendant was arrested, Whatney determined from his GPS that Defendant’s trailer was technically on a separate piece of land owned by…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prole Pronunciation Report: Orange County Jail
    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Prole Pronunciation Report: Orange County Jail

    Machjokowski failed to report to Parole Officer Thomas’s office for his weekly meeting and drug test. Mr. Machjokowski was supposed to be in the Parole Officer’s office at eight in the morning. Parole Officer Thomas set out to look for him when subject did not show up at ten in the morning and there was no response on the phone number that had been given. Parole Officer Thomas found him at work. Parolee stated “he woke up to late to meet today and I did not want to lose my job, so I came directly to work”. The Parolee was arrested on site by Officer Pasztor of the Orange County Police Department.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Brief in Irac Format
    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Brief in Irac Format

    In order for an admission to be admissible in court, prior to interrogation, the individual must first be informed in clear and unequivocal terms that he has the right to remain silent. In addition, the warning to remain silent must be accompanied by the explanation that anything can be used against the individual in court, and that the individual has the right to have an attorney present during interrogation, and if they can not afford one, then one will be appointed to them. Also, if the individual waives his right to remain silent and for counsel to be present, the police must show that the waiver was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harris Vs New York Case Study
    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page

    Harris Vs New York Case Study

    In the case Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222 (1971) Harris was accused of offering in heroin to a covert officer on two events. In any case, Harris took the stand in his own safeguard yet denied the offense, and he asserted he sold the officer two sacks of baking powder. On round of questioning the arraignment utilized repudiating proclamations made by Petitioner to police not long after his arrest. The contradicting statements were made before Petitioner got his Miranda warning. Okay, I understand about the Miranda cautioning not given before Harris affirmation, but rather shouldn't something be said about the proof? Is it accurate to say that it was tested to be heroin or baking…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Brief
    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Brief

    Facts: On May 23rd, 1957, three Cleveland police officers arrived at the home of Mrs. Mapp with information that ‘a person was hiding out in the home, who was wanted for questioning in connection with a recent bombing, and that there was a large amount of policy paraphernalia being hidden in the home’. Mrs. Mapp and her daughter lived on the top floor of the two-family dwelling. Upon their arrival at that house, the officers knocked on the door and demanded entrance but Mrs. Map telephoned her attorney who told her not to let them in without a search warrant. Three hours later more officers arrived and they again sought entrance into the home. When she didn’t come to the door immediately at least one of several doors was forced open and the policemen gained admittance. She demanded to see a search warrant and the officers flashed a piece of paper in which she grabbed and put in her blouse. A struggle ensued and she was arrested. Officers entered the home and found the obscene materials. Mrs. Mapp was convicted of knowingly having had in her possession and under her control certain lewd and lascivious books and pictures unlawfully seized during an unlawful search of the defendant’s home.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    People Vs. Shaughnessy: Case Study
    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People Vs. Shaughnessy: Case Study

    Facts: In October of 1970, the defendant, her boyfriend, and two other people drove near the area of St. Ignatius Retreat Home. The defendant was a passenger and to her understanding, they were headed for Christopher Morely…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Unit 3: Mcphillen V. Intoxicated Man
    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Unit 3: Mcphillen V. Intoxicated Man

    1. Can Mr. McPhillen be held liable for assault, battery and false imprisonment when he came to the defense of someone?…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    First Defendant Summary
    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First Defendant Summary

    They have no knowledge of the truth or otherwise of the allegations in paragraph 17 and so deny each and every one of them. The Second Defendant had no reason to believe that the Onehunga property would be used for manufacturing methamphetamine. Any prior concern he had regarding the tenant’s recreational drug use had been disclosed to the Plaintiffs by the First Defendant.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona
    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona

    * The second Defendant, Michael Vignera, was arrested for robbery. Mr. Vignera orally admitted to the robbery to the first officer after the arrest, and he was held in detention for eight hours before he made an admission to an assistant district attorney. There was no evidence that he was notified of his Fifth Amendment constitutional rights.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    landmark case
    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    landmark case

    In the year of 1991 a murder had taken place that brought upon suspicion and several conflicts amongst officials. The murder was of a man by the name of Frank Boyle and one of the suspects for the crime was Michael Feeney, the police had been informed that he was seen near the victim’s truck earlier that day. During the investigation of the murder, the police went to Feeney’s residence and waited for him to come out. When there was no answer, the police had to barge in and they searched the premises without permission. The house was an equipment trailer and the police found Feeney in his bed, they told him to get up and they saw blood stains on Feeney’s shirt. After noticing blood on his shirt the police immediately arrested him and briefly advised him of the right to a council. The accused was asked several questions and his shirt was later seized. He had been questioned for eight hours straight and he still wasn’t able to contact his lawyer, during the questioning Feeney admitted to stealing the victim’s cigarettes, beer and also some cash.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psi Report Long Form
    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Psi Report Long Form

    Please describe what you did to be arrested for this offense. This is your version of the offense and your statements will be directly quoted in this Pre-Sentence Report and will be submitted to the Court. You may also make any statements you wish in regard to your…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Doe Booking Process
    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Doe Booking Process

    Once John Doe was taken into custody, the correct procedural steps should have been to read John his Miranda rights. If john still chose to make a statement to the police, the officers would have had to require John to give a written statement, once his Miranda Rights were read to him and he still chose to talk then, everything he said could potentially be used against him.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Justice Research Paper
    • 6313 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Criminal Justice Research Paper

    Fred is drunk and driving his dad’s car. Fred is a 21 year old student at Columbia College. Fred rams into a parked car at 10th and Rogers. Thinking no one saw him; Fred moves his car and parks it on an adjacent lot. He sprints to his dorm room in Miller Hall. A neighbor saw the wreck and Fred running to the dorm. Police are called and they arrive ten minutes after the wreck. The officers see several empty beer cans and a bottle of tequila (half full) in the front seat. The tags are traced to Fred’s dad, who is called by police. Dad says that Fred is a student at Columbia College. Police run Fred's record and determine that he has two prior DWIs within the past five years. The third DWI in 10 years is a felony. Police contact Columbia College security who leads them to Fred’s dorm. Fred is passed out, so security lets them in. The officers smell intoxicants, give Fred some Field Sobriety tests (he fails) and confirm that he was driving the car. Fred is arrested for DWI. It is his third offense, a felony under Missouri law. Fred is given a breath test, which registers at .13 on the scale. During the processing of his arrest paperwork, the officers search Fred’s possessions which he brought to the station, and a small quantity of cocaine is found in Fred’s pocket. Fred is charged with DWI, leaving the scene, and possession of cocaine. What issues do you see? How should they be resolved? (50 points)…

    • 6313 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics