Gideon V. Wainwright

Topics: Gideon v. Wainwright, Supreme Court of the United States, United States Constitution Pages: 3 (789 words) Published: July 24, 2012
Gideon v. Wainwright – 372 U.S. 335 (1963)
Keilah Herring
Kaplan University

PA 260: Criminal Law
Professor Chiacchia
March 6, 2012

Gideon v. Wainwright – 372 U.S. 335 (1963)
Clarence Earl Gideon was charged with a felony under Florida State Law. He allegedly broke into a poolroom with the intent to commit a misdemeanor, thus making it a felony. Mr. Gideon was indigent and asked the court to appoint counsel for him. The court stated that because Gideon was not charged with a capital offense, under Florida State Law his request was denied. Mr. Gideon stated, “The United States Supreme Court says I am entitled to be represented by counsel”. Mr. Gideon was brought to trial without counsel and was found guilty by a jury. He was sentenced to five years in state prison. “Mr. Gideon filed a Writ of Habeas Corpus with the Florida Supreme Court on the ground of the trial court’s refusal to appoint counsel. The State Supreme Court denied all relief on the 1942 case of Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455, 62 S.Ct 1252, 886 L.ED 1595. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari. It appointed counsel since Gideon was proceeding in forma pauperis. The U.S. Supreme Court requested both sides to discuss their briefs and oral arguments as to the Betts v. Brady case being reconsidered. The court found that both the Betts and Gideon cases were so similar, that if Betts v. Brady were to stand, it would require the denial of Gideon’s claim; therefore, Betts v. Brady was overruled”. “Gideon brought habeas corpus proceedings against the Director of the Division of Corrections. Florida Supreme Court denied all relief and Gideon brought certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court, Mr. Justice Blake, found that the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provided that in all criminal prosecutions, the accused has the right to counsel for his defense appointed by the state if he is indigent. Judgment was reversed and cause remanded to the Florida Supreme Court for...

References: 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792
83 S.Ct. 792
316 U.S. 455, 62 S.Ct 1252, 886 L.Ed. 1595
135 So.2d 746
U.S.C.A.Const. Amends. 6, 14
287 U.S. 45, 53 S.Ct. 55, 77 L.Ed. 158 (1932)
304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938)
297 U.S. 233, 243-244, 56 S.Ct. 444, 446, 80 L.Ed. 660 (1936)
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Gideon vs. Wainright Essay
  • Gideon V. Wainwright Essay
  • Legal Brief Gideon V Wainwright Essay
  • Gideon V. Wainwright Essay
  • Essay about Powell v Alabama case study
  • Criminal Justice: Gideon vs. Wainwright, U.S. vs. Bagley, and In re Gault Essay
  • History 103 Maryland V. Craig Essay
  • Holmes V. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006) Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free