Preview

Gideon's Trumpet

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
665 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gideon's Trumpet
Gideon’s Trumpet
Before reading this book I was very excited to delve into it and find out what all it offered. After finishing it, I found it to be quite interesting. I learned a lot about the process that cases go through. Gideon’s trumpet is a book written by Anthony Lewis describing the story behind Gideon v. Wainwright, in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that criminal defendants have the right to an attorney even if they cannot afford it.
The main character in this book is Clarence Earl Gideon. He was a fifty-one year old white man who was from the south. He believed that he was denied “due process of the law.” Gideon was never assigned an attorney for his case so he filed a petition with the United States Supreme Court. Gideon does this while he is incarcerated in the Florida state prison. Supreme Court clerk Michael Rodak, is the man to receive the petition request from Gideon. After filing a petition, Gideon passed the first step of being heard by the Supreme Court.
In the book, Anthony Lewis describes has precise the process of the Supreme Court is. A petitioner must submit a request and in return, the opposing side has 30 days to respond to a request. For Gideon, his case had no reply so it was forwarded to the Justices. Next in the story, the reply is received and a document is formed and stated that Gideon did not have the right to counsel. A general rule in the Supreme Court is that the Justices decision follows their ideas of what is most important in the judicial system. One of the most important concepts that was portrayed in the book is “determination of Federalism”, which is states’ rights versus those of the federal government. In this book we learn that if Gideon’s “appeal” were approved, all of the states’ courts would be impacted. Later in the book, Walter Schaefer, a state judge of the Supreme Court of Illinois, stated that a right to an attorney is greater than all other rights. Following this, the



Bibliography: Lewis, Anthony. Gideon 's Trumpet. New York: Random House, 1964. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Clarence Earl Gideon was a man that was wrongfully convicted of a crime. Clarence had a bad background prior to the trial. His record prior was that he had felonies, and he was in jail for four times already, and he ran away from home, and was found with some stolen clothes on. His background didn’t make it easy for him to be found guilty. Gideon was accused of stealing wine, beer, money, and Coca Cola from the pool room. The charges that were brought to him was Petty theft. The evidence the state used against him was that he was seen by a witness breaking into the pool room. The sentencing that Gideon got was 5 years in a working prison. Gideon’s first trial was not in his favor, because he did not have a lawyer defending him, and he didn’t…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1963 Clarence Earl Gideon presented himself in front of the Supreme Court. Gideon had been indicted for breaking and entering; after defending himself in his preliminary trial he was sentenced to five years in prison. During his time in jail, Gideon did some research on law and wrote an appeal to the Supreme Court. Gideon’s request of representation was on behalf of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The court decided to put the case on trial; it related back to the Betts v. Brady case of 1942. Unlike Betts v. Brady’s 6-3 ruling in which Betts had lost, Gideon won the case with an astounding 9-0 majority. The main issue of the case centers on proper representation of the defendant. In order for the reader to fully understand the scope of the case, he or she needs to consider Betts v. Brady.…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. What is the significance of law and the jury in this novel? What is the difference between the two? Is this important? Why or…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court decided that having counsel is necessary to receive a fair trial. “Gideon transformed criminal prosecutions and generated significant funding for indigent defense nationally.” (273; WEB) Such funding provides all indigents with a defense attorney at the State level regardless of any special circumstances or the severity of the crime. Gideon’s case changed the way the 6th and 14th Amendments were interpreted thus the Federal powers forced the States to recognize this need for all defendants regardless of their incomes to receive a fair trial by way of free legal…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    USpreme Court Case Study

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, Gideon was wrong. The rule applied by the Supreme Court at that time was in fact exactly the opposite. The Constitution,…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gideon Vs Wainwright Case

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wainwright case that that everyone that ends up going to court has to be appointed a counsel to help defend themselves. People who can’t afford a counsel gets to get one through the state. They might not be the best person to help you though the case, but at least you get somebody to help you defined yourself during court. No matter how much money you have or don’t have you are required to have somebody no matter if you're the one who finds your counsel or if the supreme court finds the counsel for you. You are required to have one no matter what case it is or who it is against, even if they know you won’t come out free they are still inquired to give you a counsel. The impact that this court case made has help a thousand of people today win or lose cases. Hopefully many times it was helping them because your person you get for your counsel is suppose to make your case better and help you out not make it worse for…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He argues that a proper use of “substantive due process,” with an understanding of natural rights as expressed in the Declaration, will guarantee individual liberty, and while he may be right he countermands himself in a way in which he tries to stop the expansion of government and thus shrink it. His solution instead would expand certain aspects of power that the federal government…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world of the American Justice system, Gideon's name will always stand for the principle that the poor are just as entitled to counsel as those who can afford it. To this day, Gideon's name and the "trumpet" that he blew have rung true to the words "fair trial". He tore down the wall of Betts vs. Brady and the correlation between the Bill of Rights and the 14th Amendment. Gideon's triumph over our justice system shows that there are still flaws in our judicial structure and there are mountains still to be conquered.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Steve Bogira

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bogira has spoken widely about the book and his experience in writing it, from NPR to the Village Voice to the New York University School of Law to the Chicago chapter of the National Lawyers Guild. In March he will bring his experience to the Chicago Association of Law Libraries.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Speedy Trial Analysis

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first pertinent point to make on behalf of the argument that Flordia must provide a lawyer for Mr. Gideon is that the 6th Amendment guarantees a person the right to consult a lawyer in his or her defense. For example, every person, no matter…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom Road Summary

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The story tells of Gideon Jackson, a man of African descent who was enslaved in South Carolina, who left the plantation where he’d been held in servitude and fought with the Union Army during the Civil War, and who, from…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Duke Lacrosse Scandal

    • 3838 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Middleton, M. (1982). Should judges blow the whistle on lawyers? American Bar Association Journal, 68(10), 1207.…

    • 3838 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1932, the Powell vs Alabama Case reversed the convictions of nine black men who were accused of raping two white women. All the defendants, apart from one, were sentenced to death after a series of one-day trials and they were given minimal access to their lawyers before their trials which meant their defenses weren’t precisely planned. The convictions were reversed because the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that they weren't given a fair trial, they were denied legal counsel, and the juries excluded members of their race. This was a significant ruling because the Supreme Court had recognised that African Americans were being treated unconstitutionally, and the little rights that they did have, had been violated. This evidence shows that the Supreme Court was important in assisting African Americans achieve their civil rights because the Courts had accepted that African…

    • 1033 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With a great deal of debate the design of the United States along with the lay out by the founders of the country who took their roll in laying down the “rules” of the United States of America very seriously. The Articles of Confederation, the Bill of Rights, and the US Constitution lay the floor work of a layer of protection afforded to all United States Citizens. Each of the doctrines provides a step towards the written words that have granted many men and women protection from persecution as well as freedoms not received in other parts of the world. The last piece of the three historical documents, the US Constitution is comprised of a set of amendments, which have been written to protect several different rights that as a citizen are protected from false persecution. These constitutional amendments play a large roll, in the manner in which aspects of court procedure handled in both juvenile and adult court systems.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the period between its proposal in September 1787 and ratification in 1789, the United States Constitution was the subject of numerous debates. The contending groups consisted of Federalists, those who supported ratification, and Anti-Federalists, those opposed to the constitution. Each group published a series of letters known as the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalist papers objected to provisions of the proposed constitution while the Federalist Papers defended the rationale behind the document. Anti-Federalist objections included that; the United States was too extensive to be governed by a republic, the constitution included no bill of rights, and the federal judiciary was vaguely defined and could become too powerful. Each of these arguments is worthy of attention as an examination of the debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the proposed Constitution.…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays