Dartmouth College V. Woodward
The case of Dartmouth College V. Woodward was a famous decision from the United States Supreme Court dealing with the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution to private corporations. The case arose when the president of Dartmouth College was dismissed by his trustees. This lead to the New Hampshire legislature’s attempt to force the college to become a public university and it placed the power to appoint trustees in the hands of the governor. The College's book of records, corporate seal, and other corporate property were removed. The trustees of the College objected and wanted the actions of the legislature to be declared unconstitutional. The trustees brought Dartmouth alumnus Daniel Webster. Webster argued the college's case against William H.Woodward, the state-approved secretary of the new board of trustees. Webster's speech in support of Dartmouth was so effective that it apparently helped convince Chief Justice John Marshall, and also reportedly bring tears to Webster's eyes. The decision, handed down on February 2, 1819, ruled in favor of the College and invalidated the act of the New Hampshire Legislature, which in turn allowed Dartmouth to continue as a private institution and take back its buildings, seal, and charter. The Court ruled that the College's corporate charter qualified as a contract between private parties, the King and the trustees, with which the legislature could not bother. Even though the united States are no longer royal colonies, the contract was still used because the Constitution says that a state cannot pass laws to change contract. The fact that the government had commissioned the charter did not make the school into a civil institution. Chief Justice Marshall's opinion emphasized that the term "contract" referred to exchanges involving individual property rights, not to "the political relations between the government and its citizens. This decision created a much better business

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gibbons V. Ogden

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After a four year hiatus in the Supreme Court docket, the court finally rule in 1824, the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, which eventually proclaimed the federally supremacy clause and the commerce clause, but it's impact of American commerce can still be felt today. The loose interpretation of the Constitution by Chief Justice Marshall had greatly infuriated and scared the Southerners because if the government could regulate interstate commerce, then it could one day regulate slavery; it's technically…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gibbons V Ogden

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Chapter 11 R.J smith Gibbons v Ogden This case involved New York trying to grant a monopoly on waterborne trade between New York and New Jersey. Judge Marshal, of the Supreme Court, sternly reminded the state of New York that the Constitution gives Congress alone the control of interstate commerce. Marshal's decision, in 1824, was a major blow on states' rights. John C. Calhoun John C. Calhoun was part of the New Southern Congress of 1811. He was a representative for South Carolina and one…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gibbons V. Ogden (1824)

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    such as Marbury v. Madison (1803) and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) he established the Judicial Branch as an independent power. One case in particular, named Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), displayed his intuitive ability to maintain a balance of power, suppress rising sectionalism, and unite the states under the Federal Government. Aaron Ogden, a captain of a ship passing through New York State to trade with other states, was stopped one evening by Thomas Gibbons. He addressed Ogden to cede his ship…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The landmark case that opened up the ability for business to operate across state lines was Gibbons v. Ogden. The case started in 1809, when the Legislature of the State of New York granted exclusive navigation privileges of all boats that moved by fire or stream in the waters within the jurisdiction of the state, for twenty years, to Robert R. Livingston and Robert Fulton (Livingston). They wanted a monopoly on a national network of steamboat lines, but were unsuccessful in their pursuit. Only…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    will be examined starting from the Ogden Vs. Gibbons case and their impact on the free market evaluated with key concern being emphasized on the role the congress played in ensuring that market equilibrium was achieved through supply and demand controls. The paper will also analyze various cases like the Wickard v. Filburn (1942), United States v. Darby Lumber Co. (1941), NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937), Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, Inc. (1935), Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1851) and a deep…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gibbons Vs Ogden Essay

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    state of New York granted Aaron Ogden an exclusive monopoly to operate his steamboat between New York and New Jersey. Ogden suddenly becomes aware that another individual, Thomas Gibbons, is operating along the same route. Afterwards, Ogden claimed that New York has not given Gibbons the rights to operate on that route. Gibbons, on the other hand, claimed that he had the rights to travel on that route because of an act passed by Congress dealing with coastal commerce. Ogden ended up suing, and the New…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gibbons Vs. Ogden Cases

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page

    The increase of shipping by steamboats led to conflict over waterway rights. Let's start with the Gibbons vs. Ogden case, it was in 1819. When Aaron Ogden sued Thomas Gibbons for operating steamboats in New York that Ogden owned. The Gibbons vs. Ogden case didn't go to the Supreme Court till 1824. Where the the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gibbons, and the federal government reinforce their right to regulate trade between the states by ending the monopolistic control over the waterways in some…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court held that the word commerce comprehended navigation, and that it had the power to regulate navigation. Secondly, the Supreme Court held that navigation involved the control of navigable waters, and included the power to keep them open and free from obstruction, and to make improvements. Thirdly, the Supreme Court concluded that under the commerce clause Congress had the power to authorize improvements in waters within the limits of a state…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gibbon v Ogden decision One of the most important decision of the early Supreme Court. The New York legislature had passed a law giving a monopoly to steamship travel to a group of New York investors. Among the investors given permission in this monopoly was Aaron Ogden. Thomas Gibbon another steamship trader wanted to use New York's water ways to do his business to. Gibbon Gibon believed he should be able to use these waterways because of permission given to him by the federal government. Gibbon…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ogden in (1824). Gibbons v. Ogden is a case where two men have been granted a monopoly to run a ferry across the Hudson River. The Hudson River separate Manhattan from New Jersey. The state of New York granted Ogden a license to run a ferry across Hudson River, and the federal government granted Gibbons the license to run a ferry across the Hudson River. Both men sued each other in court, and the Supreme…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays