Getting Off and Getting Intimate
How does a women decide whether a man is into her or not? Most times it could be the way he approaches her. This article shows that the total institution will have an effect on your mindset because in order to be a member of that group, you have to learn a new value system. In class we discussed that there are racial differences not because so much that these guys are black but because these guys are black in a society where the dominant group is white and within consciousness being in an upper class institution; there’s a certain way that they talk. If you’re in the most prestigious fraternity chances are you’re good looking, probably come from money, are athletically inclined, etc. This becomes a part of your identity and when you layer race on to that, it’s another piece of which you have to be conscious and you have to act the part. This is important to remember because it’s not that these guys in the reading are black but because they have to play the role of maintaining a certain standard. Also not many blacks make it out of the hood, so the one that does pretty much has to prove the stereotype wrong. The stereotype given to black men is that they rob, steal, rape and other crazy things. When one finally “makes it” they have to maintain a certain behavior to show that its not every black man who commits crimes and there are some that do make it out and do something positive with themselves.
I thought this reading could be taken very offensively by the black society in such a way that they are given labels and the way others view them. In the reading on page 149, it says, “Although white fraternity men may also be visible, the sheer number of white students leads to them being held less accountable, and consequently, able to perform masculinity in a manner that black fraternity men cannot.” Therefore, black men need to be more respectful to women because there are fewer of them. Since white men are numerous and are able to get away with it, they don’t feel accountable. After conducting some interviews, it suggests that black men are more romantic than white men and that black men treat women better because white men primarily view women as sexual objects.
In the Greek and racially based communities, “There is a social status that fraternity men must maintain and they are surely concerned about their individual and group reputations when it comes to making gender relation choices. They aim to steer clear of certain social scenes to preserve their status as elite men. In some accounts, participants indicate that in order to maintain their reputation, they normally will not hookup with low status women. Cheating could also result in a bad reputation especially if it was with a sorority sister, resulting in bad name-calling” (154-155). Because black fraternity men perceive themselves as constantly visible, black men need to be more conscious of their behavior and how they treat women as how I also mentioned in the first paragraph.
I think it is unfair that black fraternity men are restricted to certain privileges because of their color or because of their social status. This reading demonstrates how visibility and accountability function as mechanisms of privilege. “Because of the small size of the black community and the perceived obligation of the black fraternity men of having to be the ideal black student, they reap a higher level of accountability and visibility based on expectations from and interactions with others. Visibility and accountability function as mechanisms of privilege” (155).
The fraternities in the reading are structured differently due to the racial make up of their constituents. “Social institution and normative institutional arrangements look at the same phenomena, the way in which the fraternities are structured differently due to the racial makeup of their components. Social institution is defined as an organized pattern of...
Bibliography: Zinn Baca, Maxine, Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo, & Michael Messner. Gender Through the Prism of Difference, 4th Edition. Oxford University, 2010. Print.
Scharfer, T. Richard, Sociology Matters, 5th Edition. McGraw-Hill: New York. p.334
Please join StudyMode to read the full document