Preview

George Washington's Two-Party System Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1316 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
George Washington's Two-Party System Analysis
The founders hoped to avoid factions in the government which was the equivalent of the political parties which came into being. The founding fathers goal would become unachievable during George Washington’s presidency which would mark the beginning of the two party systems. This system began with Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, was the Secretary of the Treasury and the antifederalists who became known as the democratic republicans led by Jefferson. Political parties were very important in the evolution of the way the united states governed itself due to the fact that people with shared economic and cultural goals joined together to influence policy decisions in America. These parties were able to back candidates for certain positions. Once …show more content…
The idea of succession was also brought up at the convention and despite the fact that it was never really discussed it the idea of succession from the union outraged nationalists that emerged following the war and caused the party to be viewed unpopularly. As a result of the Federalists everyone began making a claim of membership of the Democrat-Republican, caused the one party system to be doomed from the beginning due to the fact that there were too many different competing interests. The supposed era of good feelings represented the presidency of James Monroe and the nationalism that develops after the war of 1812. During this time Henry Clay develops the American system of a Strong banking system, protective tariffs, and a network of roads and canals this system contributed to the development of the US because it gave us the financial stability needed for industrialization. This system also created conflict between different regional groups who had distinct economic systems that would be affected by the different policy decisions the government would make and would contribute to shaky …show more content…
Andrew Jacksons creation of the spoils system was created to reward political supporters with public office was seen as allowing common man into the government but was really it allowed for each political party to have more influence in the government because the political party in power could hire their supporters. The Tariff of abominations was a result of inter party tensions between Jacksonians and the Adams administration. Despite the fact that Jackson was not a big fan of the tariff but he was opposed to south Carolina threatening nullification even more and passed the force bill which allowed for the military to collect federal funds if need be. Despite the fact that this conflict was solved by henry clay’s compromise of slowly lowering the tariff, the south became even more opposed of the federal government’s power due to their fear of the government getting involved with slavery. The democratic republicans also affected the development of the United States due to the fact that they elected Andrew Jackson and he was opposed to national bank and believed that it was monopolistic, his opposition caused him to veto the re-charter of the bank and instead deposited government funds into state banks that were not regulated. This lack of regulation resulted in ups and downs in the economy which would result in the financial crash of 1837. Political parties also influenced the United States because in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Roughly between the years 1820 and 1836, new issues and ideas were introduced to the American society. The “Era of Good Feelings” was over and democratic ideals began to flow through the minds of Americans. The nationalistic illusion had faded when issues over slavery and economic distress struck the country. In addition, the United States expansion westward led to financial difficulties as well as sectionalism. The strong sectionalism in the country caused a political uproar and the formation of the two-party political system. One of the parties was the Jacksonian Democrats who had a tough opponent known as the Whigs. Jacksonian Democrats, a new energetic party led by President Andrew Jackson, believed strongly in trying to bolster their democratic ideals. Although the Democrats did not protect individual liberties, they were the guardians of political democracy, economic opportunity, and the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy Dbq

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This included industrialization, internal improvements, and the Bank of the United States. All three contributed to the significance of the development. Tariffs such as the Tariff of 1828 (Tariff of Abominations) supplemented the development of democracy because of what he and the nation believed was right. Many people from the South were upset about the Tariff of Abominations since it caused items that weren't taxed before, to be taxed. Internal improvements were also made to benefit the states. Lighthouses and river improvements were built. Another contributing factor to the development of democracy was through the Panic of 1837. This was mostly a financial problem since the bank was over-speculating and issuing more and more paper money which then leads to an inflation. Jackson withdrew government funds and placed them in state banks. Jackson believed that the government shouldn't be involved in the economy because they were irresponsible. His distrust in the government starts the development of…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Revolutionary- Federalist Era, politics, parties, programs, policies, and people made an enormous difference in how the new nation should be structured and run. During this era, two men in particular championed politics and their respective parties. These two men were Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, and Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. Both Hamilton and Jefferson were successful college educated intellectuals and politicians who made significant contributions to the development of the United States policies and programs. However Hamilton, despite never being elected President, had more influence over the development of the United States’ policies and programs during the Revolutionary-Federalist Era. Historically Hamilton and Jefferson are known for agreeing to disagree over just about every policy being discussed during the establishment of government structure, and decorum. And it is Hamilton’s policies on economics, government structure, and constitution interpretation, which took precedent over Jefferson’s.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    IsaacS Period 4 LEQ

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Firstly, upon ratification of the Constitution, the Federalists and Jeffersonian Democrats parties established their footing in the American political system. These two parties divided the nation into northern ideals and southern Jefferson based ideals that were very different. Due to this political disunity, sectional interest arose rather than national interest as observed in the 1828 "tariff abomination.”…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our first president George Washington was a wise man and didn’t believe in political parties. He thought political parties would split apart the country and make government a competition instead of a place to serve the people. Although, inevitably the first political parties were made, the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans. The original political parties in America had very different views on many topics including their interpretation of the Constitution.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Jefferson’s presidency, he implemented an embargo that required a strong central government to enforce.(Doc F) As a result of the embargo, manufacturing grew more rapidly under Jefferson than that of the federalist leader. With the band of trade, America became dependent on nation made products which helped grow the manufacturing industry drastically. By 1812, John Adams began to approve of the two Republican presidents’ restoration of the taxes and the Navy.(Doc G) Jefferson had restored taxes while he held office, while Madison worked on building back up the Navy. Even though the Founding Fathers were both finding a moderate ground, others were not adjusting. During both presidencies, the tariffs kept and enforced were disliked by some Republicans. Southern Democratic-Republican farmers rejected the protective tariff created by Madison because it lead to higher prices.(Doc H) These tariffs were set by Hamilton, and enhanced by Republican…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Jacksonian Era from about 1828-1842, the Democrats set the standard to be carried on later by the Populists. The Jacksonian Democrats identified with the common man. They wanted all democrats to agree. In 1828, Andrew Jackson was elected president and he was later reelected in 1832. In the year of his reelection, Jackson established the spoils system to reform the government, removing some federal officeholders ("To the victor belong the spoils") and made the right of elected officials to appoint their own followers to public office and established feature of American politics. Also in this year, Jackson vetoed the bill to recharter the Bank of the United States. This sets the tone for his, and the Democrats, ongoing battle with the Bank and its president, Nicholas Biddle, later to rise to climax when Jackson removed federal deposits from the Bank of the United States. A year later, in 1833, the nullification crisis erupted, pushing Jackson and his Democrats into another battle, this one with John Calhoun and nullification. Jackson insisted that nullification was treason and those implementing it were traitors. The nullification crisis was averted by compromise: the lowering of the tariff of 1828, the tariff of abominations, gradually be lowered. Jackson believed in a distinct, but simple theory of democracy, that it should offer "equal protection and equal benefits" to all its white male citizens and favor no region of class over another. This meant an assault on what he considered the citadels of the eastern…

    • 685 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first political party system includes the Federalists v. Democratic Republicans. The Federalists, led by John Adams and Alexander Hamilton, believed in a strong national government. They wanted to create a Constitution. They argued that government power should be used to promote economic development through a national bank. Democratic-Republicans, were led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. They supported a weaker national government. They feared that federal involvement in the economy would benefit only a few wealthy northeasterners, and they thought that agriculture should still be the country's economic source. The second party system which included the Democrats v. Whigs differs from the first political party. Whigs, led by…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The origins of the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties can be traced back to the early 1790s. Initially, the Federalists, or broad constructionists, favored the growth of federal power and a strong central government. The Federalists promulgated a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which meant that they believed that the government could do anything by the implied powers of the Constitution or that congress had the right to interpret the Constitution based on connotation. On the contrary, the Democratic-Republicans favored the protection of states’ rights and the strict containment of federal power. The Democratic-Republicans were strict constructionists and they believed only in the enumerated powers of the Constitution. Up until 1800, these descriptions of the two political parties were very accurate. However during the period of 1801-1817, the Jefferson and Madison’s presidencies reveal that these characterizations were accurate only to a certain extent. These characterizations became inaccurate when Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe stepped up in power as president and were forced to compromise their political views for the benefit of the country in the face of war, economic pressure, and threats to the Union.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson helped to provide for a strong protection of popular democracy and individual liberty to the United States. Andrew Jackson known as the people’s president held a strong emotion in the states right’s which advocated to the increase of executive power. President Andrew Jackson was good for his country, because he provided certain decisions that helped form America into a better place than where it was before. President Andrew Jackson showed significant positives towards the people of the United States. President Andrew Jackson’s creation of the Democratic Party still exists today. His great efforts to eliminate the Bank of the United States helped to pay off all the national debts in America. Jackson’s Indian Policy wanted to end any future conflicts between Indian land owners and white land owners. Andrew’s views on how government should be rotated provided a reform in government. The spoils system affected America positively because the spoils system let people who earn their power is able to switch throughout the government positions. Under Andrew Jackson the people of the United States were given more to the states rights than any other president before Andrew. Andrew Jackson proved through his actions that he was state rights advocate, while expanding his executive power.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political parties separated the country. Washington had tried to prevent them from rising up, but due to extreme differences in views, his attempt was futile. Hamilton's strong central government idea contrasted with Jefferson's strong state side government. Sides were taken, and differences were debated. Without a compromise, each party would continue to try and impose their beliefs on the American people. The Democratic-Republicans appealed more to the common man, whereas the Federalists favored wealthy aristocrats. Financially, the Federalists were much more powerful than the Democratic-Republicans. The wealthy merchants were voted into office originally because of their social and economic status. Prior to Jefferson's administration, many politicians were not publicly known like today. This led to Washington and Adam's government being controlled by the Federalists. Jefferson would win the people and presidency. Jefferson and his supporters would control the government, ensuring that America would remain a democracy.…

    • 641 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Warns against the party system. “It serves to distract the Public Councils, and enfeeble the Public Administration… agitates the Community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one… against another… it opens the door to foreign influence and corruption… thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.” Washington saw a potentially harmful political factionalism in the country. He insisted Americans to unite for the good of the country. Two political parties had developed in the early 1790s, the Federalist and the Republicans (later known as Democratic-Republicans). The Federalists, and Washington himself, backed up Hamilton’s plan for a central bank and other strong central economic plans based on manufacturing. The Republicans went against the Hamilton’s plan and favored farmers as opposed to city people. Washington predicted that this political division would play significantly in the new government, as these two developing parties attempted to guide the nation and shape it to match with their thought. In today’s society, we have two different parties: Democrats and Republicans. Democrats are more liberal. They believe in a…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early days of the United States of America when the country was beginning to grow under the newly ratified Constitution, there were two main political parties in existence, the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans. From the time period of 1801-1817, the two presidents that were elected to rule the U.S. were Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Both Jefferson and Madison were Jeffersonian Republicans who were characterized as strict-constructionists in respect to the federal constitution before they each took the office of the presidency, but when they took office the public found out that Jefferson and Madison's previous characterizations had not been very accurate when, as president, they began to act like the opposite of what they originally believed in.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A precedent to today’s Democratic and Republican rivalry, the United States witnessed the beginnings of internal political divisions with the First Party System. Those seeking a strong central government and well-developed foreign policies rallied their support behind the Federalist Party and its founder, the first Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton. Whilst those who desired more focus on the rights of individual states and the common people at the base of the nation became members of, the first Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson’s Democratic-Republican Party. However, neither party was able to stand the test of time: the Federalists with waning support dissolved during Monroe’s Era of Good Feelings, the Democratic-Republicans…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the United States protests are breaking out everywhere over a multitude of problems. The common theme among all of them is that there are two sides to the problem, no more, no less. This is precisely what is tearing our country apart – partisanship in the two-party system. If our first president George Washington were here today he would be highly disappointed in how our system of government is run by two parties. In his own words, " They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation the will of a party, often small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make public…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays