Preview

George Orwell's "Politics and the English Language" Rhetorical Précis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
278 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
George Orwell's "Politics and the English Language" Rhetorical Précis
Goerge Orwell, in “Politics and the English Language”, demonstrates how to effectively express oneself with written language. To do so, Orwell states the “dos” and “don’ts” of effective writing. Because the rules for writing effectively are so complex, Orwell utilizes parallel structure to make the body structure of his essay more cohesive: “… it has nothing to do with archaism… it is especially concerned with the scrapping of… It has nothing to do with correct grammar… it is not concerned with… Nor does it even imply… though it does imply…” (Orwell). Orwell interlaces multiple parallel structures to give the body both unity and a back-and-forth feel that keeps the audience on their toes. If he had not done so, his arguments would have quickly become repetitive and monotonous. Although Orwell specifically states that “correct grammar and syntax… are of no importance”, one can see that he has gone to great lengths to achieve an engaging effect through syntax. The back-and-forth action of the body paragraphs and his self-contradiction alludes to a rule he introduces later in the writing: “Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous” (Orwell). He then goes on to break a number of his previously stated rules, some more blatantly than others: “… send some worn-out and useless phrase… into the dustbin” (Orwell). He also uses polysyllabic diction at some points, though he expressly states to “Never use a long word where a short one will do”. His contradiction of himself may at first leave some readers puzzled, but ultimately establishes the concept that a writer should not be afraid to break conventions to make a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After a ninety-hour workweek, Winston is exhausted. In the middle of Hate Week, Oceania has switched enemies and allies in the ongoing war, heaping upon Winston a tremendous amount of work to compensate for the change. At one rally, the speaker is forced to change his speech halfway through to point out that Oceania is not, and has never been, at war with Eurasia. Rather, the speaker says, Oceania is, and always has been, at war with Eastasia. The people become embarrassed about carrying the anti-Eurasia signs and blame Emmanuel Goldstein’s agents for sabotaging them. Nevertheless, they exhibit full-fledged hatred for Eastasia.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A major theme for both of Orwell’s works is the idea that people, ignorantly, don’t care about what they say or think, and then because they don’t have minds of their own they are easier to manipulate. In his Politics and the English Language, Orwell says how people don’t think about what they are writing and how they have no control over their own mind as ready-made phrases fill their paper and their mind. Then in 1984, Orwell takes this idea a step further showing how easy a civilization of thoughtless ignorance can become one of mindless devotion towards the government. In the book the characters lose their sense family ties, lose sense of time, they lose emotions, they lose their individuality, they lose their ability to remember the past,…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell demonstrates how words can deceive and manipulate people by negating the beauty of language with a tool that obliterates…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first article, Search Engine Agendas by Gary Anthes is based on how the internet can redirect your political views by giving pleasant or unpleasant, information or news on a platform you’re searching up. The author, Gary Anthes, is a technology writer and editor based in Arlington, Virginia therefore he is able to speak about this topic because of the research he implements into his written article. Right away in the first paragraph, Gary gives a summary of the main ideas of George Orwell’s novel, 1984. One of the ideas presented in 1984 is of the invisible entity that manipulates the truth and perspectives of citizens without their acknowledgement. The author compares this idea to today’s internet because search engines…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By putting a single thought into a simple sentence, Orwell communicates key points in a fairly clear way without involving many…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell uses the example of Mohandas Gandhi to attempt to make an argument on why human beings should avoid sainthood and just accept “imperfection”, because when it comes down to it, every human being is imperfect. Orwell develops his own position on this theory through an open minded tone; this is a very smart move on his part because this draws the reader in and makes them want to consider what he has to say because he is isn’t completely denying Gandhi’s point of view all the supporters of Gandhi are willing to listen to him.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Injuries in the Nfl

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Orwell, George. “politics and the English Language.” The McGraw-Hill: Issues Across The Disciplines.11th edition. Ed. Gilbert Muller. New York: McGraw-Hill,2011. Print. 106-116.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell illustrates this by showing the power Newspeak has over the people's perception of the past and present by manipulating the meanings of the words and changing history and news. Finally, Orwell mainly wrote 1984 to warn about the dangers of a totalitarian government, and the Party creating Newspeak to control its people was part of that warning. However, while there are countless ways that language is changing in the modern day, from abbreviations to slang, these changes are due to the inevitable evolution of language. In conclusion, George Orwell’s book 1984 shows the effect language has on one’s ability to express their opinions and…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The statement by Charlie Reece “Our time and his time remain the same” instigates the questioning of how Orwell’s concept of freedom transcends the importance of individuality through time. By asking myself, ‘how does he promote these democratic principles of freedom in the face of political adversary?’ I am implored to examine the way in which Orwell’s essays use coherent structure and language to create timeless literary works. In both contemporary English society and my own, the core values of contextual integrity, individuality, freedom and truth are threatened by political manipulation and Orwell strives to reveal this to any society under the threat of political conformity.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell claims that the two common main problems in modern writing. One is staleness of imagery, the other is lack of precision. People will make four mistakes of their article that illustrate below. The first one is dying metaphors, George Orwell argues, people are fond to use metaphors to create vivid image to their readers, but it always accomplish the very opposite. The second one is operators or verbal false limbs. To make sentence symmetry, people will use inappropriate and useless word, which will makes article become very strange. The reason why people make mistakes is because they there don’t want to choose the appropriate verbs and nouns to express their thoughts. As a result, they use vocabulary randomly. The third is pretentious diction. Some of bad writer usually use foreign words and expression to decorate their articles, which makes the articles become pretentious. The final is meaningless words, especially in art criticism and literary criticism. George Orwell argues that these articles always make any sense. Not only the writers don’t know the substantial content in their articles, but also the readers. Additionally, in some political writing, it is difficult to define some political words since different people will have different private definitions. Then, George Orwell points out that the worst problem of modern writing is not using improper words but putting words and ready-made phrases together mechanically. The benefit of this action is that people do not need to strive to consider about which word is suitable for this sentence, but the consequence is that it makes your article vague.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Orwell said that political prose was formed "to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind". Orwell believed that, because this writing was intended to hide the truth rather than express it, the language used was necessarily vague or meaningless. This unclear prose was a "contagion" which had spread…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To emphasize the complexity of the rules of writing, Orwell utilizes parallel structure, often interlacing parallel structures to keep the reader on his/her toes and give the body unity. His parallel structures also assist in straying away from repetition of ideas and a monotonous tone. Although Orwell states that “correct grammar and syntax…are of no importance,” one can see that he most definitely attempts to engage his readers through syntax and grammar (109). His back-and-forth writing between his body paragraphs and his self contradiction supports the rule he later introduces: “Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous” (112). His contradictions of himself may at first leave some readers puzzled, but ultimately establishes the concept that a writer should not be afraid to break conventions to make a point.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell’s 1946 essay ‘Why I Write’ is enshrined with a set of innate values adhered to and advocated by Orwell himself. In recounting his personal journey in becoming a writer, Orwell enlists the underlying ideals justifying his initial motives for writing. Subsequently, it is the representation of deeply held ideals such as the innate personal connection to writing, the impact of context on a writer, the value of writing and the reasons for writing that captivate audiences and underpin the meaning of Orwell’s essay. The eudemonistic virtues exhorted by Orwell as expressed through the essay form therefore serve to represent the values and ideals shaped by his context, that are eminent within his writings. The unfailing sense of personal connection Orwell bears to writing pervades throughout the essay, and subsequently captivates the audience. Orwell’s use of personal childhood anecdotes, of where he felt “isolated and undervalued” evokes a personal connection of sympathy from the reader, and thus signifies the development of Orwell as a writer. From the opening anecdotes, where Orwell alludes to the Greek playwright ‘Aristophanes’ and the English poet ‘William Blake’ it is event that ‘writing’ remained an innate component of George Orwell’s identity and that attempts to suppress or neglect this passion would be “outraging” his true nature. Orwell argues that the essence of his writing stems from personal experience and the innate connection of he bore to literature from an early age. However, whilst Orwell does argue that writing itself must involve a self-driven personal engagement, he concedes that the development of language is influenced and shaped by other writers. Therefore, the use of personal anecdotes underpins the innate, personal connection that Orwell shared with writing and thus captivates the audience. The exploration of context in shaping an author’s thoughts and writings are central concerns dealt with by Orwell within the essay. Orwell’s…

    • 1038 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The title of the book selected for the book-review is ‘Essays of Orwell’ edited by M.G.Nayar.…

    • 4116 Words
    • 118 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euphemisms in Modern English

    • 10601 Words
    • 43 Pages

    Orwell, George. “Politics and the English Language”. mla.stanford.edu. 2005-2006. Web. 25 May 2012. PDF file.…

    • 10601 Words
    • 43 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics