Preview

Genetic Engineering Ethics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
856 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Genetic Engineering Ethics
The beginning of the industrialization era has been marked as revolutionary for the human race. Within the last few decades, rapid changes in technology have brought ease into the daily lives of human beings, from the creation of jobs, to the ability to talk to loved ones overseas. However, are there ethical limits upon how far science may progress? With science fiction slowly becoming reality, technological advances such as gene editing have given scientists the ability to alter genetic traits to suit the needs of humans. At first, it may seem like a breakthrough humanity desperately needs to overcome many obstacles facing the human race. However, this highly controversial process could lead to unintended consequences due to limitations in …show more content…
This meeting was similar to one that took place in 1975, however, the stakes were much higher. Everyone at this meeting had access to a tool that could give humanity the ‘source code’ of life, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR). Previous genetic editing techniques were already available before CRISPR, so why was this so significant? To put it into simple terms, imagine a keyboard with a single function of typing letters. That was the level of gene editing we were capable of achieving before. Now, with CRISPR, you are given access to arrow keys, a space bar, backspace, and one of the most powerful tools, “CTRL F”. This technique could revolutionize humanity, but just like any revolution, it comes with several risks, consequences, and implications. CRISPR could allow researchers to conjure science fiction ideas into reality. Ideas such as designer babies, mutants, or even an army of genetically modified super …show more content…
We may fear of creating a world where we will reject imperfect humans and certain qualities based upon our prejudice, and preconceived perceptions of beauty and intelligence. Once the first engineered child is born, a door will open that cannot be closed. By permitting human gene editing, it would sooner or later lead to an adaptation for other enhanced purposes. Genetic engineering markets could also emerge, increasing existing inequality and discrimination challenges around the world. Some of the largest universities in the USA are already engaged in a war over the patent on CRISPR which is said to be worth billions of dollars. Although some countries do have legislations that ban genetic modification, a lot of other countries such as the United States have unenforceable guidelines. Even if the process of CRISPR were to be perfected beyond measure, there are still many implications and risks upon the implementation of gene editing in society and how it will be regulated by governments and organizations. Many may also argue whose consent will be taken into consideration when scientists begin to play the role of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Progress, which can be defined as making the world increasingly better, is a fundamental element of Garrett’s argument. She explains that synthetic genomic research marks the beginning of tapping biology’s full potential. The beginning of a biology revolution, bioengineering research mimics revolutions in physics that allow for clean energy and other advancements. But one cannot discount that progress in physics also led to the atomic bomb, and bioengineering’s atomic bomb could be an epidemiological catastrophe. If the government mitigates negative effects like this through the regulations that Garrett suggests, it is possible that bioengineering research could be a prime example of progress, making the world astoundingly better through tailored vaccinations and…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” the author Richard Hayes is responding to Ronald M. Green’s article on gene therapy. Hayes is a visiting scholar at the University of California at Berkeley and has a Ph.D. in Energy and Resources. He has also addressed the United Nations about banning human cloning worldwide. The author argues against using genetic therapy in human research because of the risk it provides for human rights. He believes that it will likely result in the escalation of social inequality. Hayes is wrong, but also right at the same time. He is right about how gene manipulation has the potential to cause some real harm, but is wrong about how people should never use genetic technologies.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Baltimore’s written work of Limiting Science: A Biologist’s Perspective discusses the controversy of research in molecular biology and its limitless freedom, disputing there should be freedom in which direction science heads, but the public should decide the pace at which it goes. Baltimore first begins his argument with the discussion of how molecular biology began. It was born from individual sciences where attempts at trying to solve the mysteries in these fields led to the realization that the answers lied in genetics. Advances in the field are what really are at the heart of this discussion though. The most critical one is the development of recombinant DNA where DNA can be multiplied for an indefinite period, but the potential of this process has scared some scientists, even Baltimore himself, about unforeseen events. This led to even more unsettling questions that inevitably hurt the field of genetics, which Baltimore goes on to explain that the dangers have been blown out of proportion. The most common subject that comes to discussion through these fears is genetic engineering. Baltimore delves into the two techniques for altering imperfect genes, and then raises two questions that normally pop up. Who gets to decide what genes get altered and how will they decide it will be done? For Baltimore this presents a dilemma of both ethics and morals and thus presents the real problem at heart. To clarify the argument against recombinant DNA research Baltimore presents to the reader similar arguments. After he gives us the danger of actively researching genetic engineering, Baltimore flips the coin and argues the danger of restricting it. His theory is that the criterion used to decide how science should be handled reflects a dominant principle of governing. This should not be allowed to control scientific advances nor should science be the servant to this ideology, mainly because of the repercussions on society it could…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crichton says there will be a bill to try and make the full benefit of the decoded genome available to us all and believes that it will return us to fuel innovation and common genetic heritage (442). Calfee says the patients and the research process are the beneficiaries because gene patents are working the way they are supposed to be and have been working for a couple of centuries and more (445). One way or another patenting genes affect our privates human genes we are born with, the money it will cost to have tests done on that specific gene if patented, and the scope of which we can do research to help find the best possible solutions, the question is, is gene patenting for the greater good of human beings or are we so money hungry we would rather be blind to…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Technology has improved rapidly over the past millennium, however there is still a lot to be learned, in terms of the long term effects of such ”Promethean powers”. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a perfect example of how much can wrong in such little time if scientists refuse to take ethical and moral responsibilities for their own creations. Many practices such as gene manipulation and cloning are being done even without adequate scientific knowledge of their impacts on the human race and the environment. Society is being turned blind to the thought of these types of technology which they believe will be beneficial in the long run. Instead they are proving to cause more harm than good, and scientists are refusing to take proper actions and responsibilities against these types of technologies. Scientists nowadays are refusing to eat their own genetically modified organisms, out of fear that will get cancer and other illnesses. These same scientists are still working for the same companies who produce genetically modified organisms for all the people to buy and eat. It just goes to show that nowadays it is all about corporate profit rather than the good of the people. Corporate profit is being chosen at the expense of human health and well being, and since the creation of these organisms are so complex, the fingers…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eighty-five years ago, the publication of the novel Brave New World by Aldous Huxley changed the perspective of Americans towards genetic engineering. “Genetic engineering is the deliberate modification of the characteristics of an organism by manipulating its genetic material” (Michaels 1). In this novel, there is an abundant misapplication of genetic engineering to control society. The practice of genetic engineering in Huxley’s world is extremely dangerous as it denies social order, diminishes individual freedom and enhances government supremacy within the society which is manifested in modern civilization as well.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With the development of genetic modification scientists have created a chicken that has a dinosaur leg in a reverse evolution experiment, a goat that produces spider silk, featherless chicken, glow in the dark cats, sheep and monkeys and recently in February 2016 British scientists were granted permission to genetically modify human embryos. Just as Etienne Geoffroy St. Hilaire and his son Isidore Geoffroy St. Hilaire created malformations in chicken embryos, scientists in the 21st century are creating malformations in animals in the name of science – for “the good” of human beings. Wherever a person situates themselves in time, whether it is in the 18th century or 21st century, people need to understand that there will always be consequences for what we choose to do with the knowledge we gain. Knowledge can create and knowledge can destroy- both in the physical realm and in the moral realm. Morally speaking, knowledge can change how individuals (and collectively human beings) view themselves in the world and how individuals view other animals and material things in the…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modifying genes could be a way of preventing unwanted traits or enhance characteristics (Against Designer Babies, Sheldon Krimsky). Unfortunately, CRISPR is a first generation tool, so there is no possibility no damage will be done to the baby. As well as no security, the baby will not have any life-threatening defects, as it is known that “curing” one disease causes another. In fact, this will create a bad relationship between parents and children (The Ethnic of ‘Designer Babies’, Tia Ghose), since the children have no choice in being modified. Using babies to alter their characteristics is using them as science experiments since there are over one hundred genes that account for each trait and fifty genes account for three percent of one gene (Against Designer Babies, Sheldon Krimsky). With many parents willing to allow these experimentations to occur on their baby, it will come at a huge…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic engineering often gets a bad rap with changing the natural evolutionary cycle, but it could, with proper guidance, improve almost every aspect of daily life. Advances in the Biotech Revolution have made many things that we had merely considered to be science fiction or a thing of dreams are now possible.The fact of the matter is that genetic engineering is applicable to everyday life while still being ethical and inline with people’s morals.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although scientists and other supporters paint a pretty picture of how ideal our lives would be with so many genetic choices within reach, genetic engineering undermines rather than enhances the promise of humanity because we fail to see the big picture of the responsibilities and consequences of possessing such a God-like ability.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brave New World Analysis

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The science of today can create super baby's, which Huxley predicted by engineering everyone through conditioning. The debate between nature vs nurture has battled for over a century and half, as to whether genes or environment play a role in human nature. Steven Pinker a Canadian psychologist, says that genes are the reason for human behavior. Pinker reinforces his idea by talking about children, “[Anyone with a] child knows that kids come into the world with certain temperaments and talents” (Pinker, 2003). Environmental factors do not play a detrimental role in the development of children, the genes determine how the child will work. Some genes may cause children to have a bad temper, while other genes may make children behave. To edit genes was thought of as a game changer, to be able to remove unwanted traits such as the cancer gene or make people immune to every known bacteria and virus known to man. Today there is CRISPR or Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat. According to Harvard University “CRISPR changed not only the way basic research is conducted, but also the way we can now think about treating diseases” (CRISPR, para 1). Humans can edit genes in other humans to remove genes that are thought as being unworthy or useless. CRISPR can be similar to Brave New World but because of ethics and regulations on changing and or…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite rapid scientific progress, many people of the public feel somewhat excluded from the debate surrounding the application of science in new technologies and products. Moreover, as scientific progress becomes increasingly fundamental to society, it is becoming equally difficult to stop it from clashing with long-held ethical values. One common and long standing debate is gene therapy. In 2005, a public survey was conducted to see people’s attitudes towards human gene therapy and while 82% stated that they would accept somatic therapy for major illnesses like heart disease, only 64% supported…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine a world where autism and downs syndrome are a thing of the past, and where there is no shortage on food for anybody. Over the years mankind has developed and improved technology to save more and more lives through the manipulation of the DNA that makes up all living organisms. However, there are those who oppose this approach. Despite the risks and ethical concerns, genetic engineering holds the potential to benefit humanity through both direct and indirect means.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Technology continues to have a major impact on healthcare and how it’s delivered in the U.S. The use of the technological developments in healthcare is what raises basic questions and the issue of whether or not it is ethical or moral to do so. The technology and research used in the US have no ranked one of the highest, are known as the best worldwide, and have therefore allowed Americans promising breakthroughs in the areas that include cancer treatments, surgical treatments, innovations in biotechnology and pharmacology. The advancements in genetic research has allowed the world of medicine to better understand perplexed medical conditions and the abilities to soon prevent or reverse many inherited conditions with the help of genetically engineered drugs. Along with many controversial ethical issues involving healthcare, biotechnology is an area that poses a dilemma and raises a moral debate. In all, biotech has improved human healthcare and enabled biotechnologists to develop ways to give faster, more precise tests and therapies with less side effects.…

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic Testing Ethics

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Indeed, Genetic information play a major role in medicine as an important determinant of a factor of diseases. Certainly, the use of clinical screening and genetic testing in Individuals and family members allow them to obtain data about important Genetic facts that could contribute to the prevention and treatment of diseases. However, to use this sensitive information require the clinicians and healthcare professionals knowledge about risks and ethical implication of genetic diseases. “Ethical theories and principles provide a framework for resolving ethical dilemmas in maternal screening for genetic conditions” (Lea, Williams, & Donahue 2005, page. 234).…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics