Preview

General Zaroff’s an Unrealistic Character

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
259 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
General Zaroff’s an Unrealistic Character
General Zaroff’s An Unrealistic Character On the surface General Zaroff’s character seems very realistic; a highly decorated military man with wealth, refinement, and a taste for high end goods. However, below the surface Richard Connell’s depiction of General Zaroff is unrealistic. In the story “The Most Dangerous Game” Connell portrays the General as a savage who devalues human life. The General has lost touch with reality as a whole because he has rationalized his hunting of humans. The General first appears to Rainsford very much like a real person in that he offers hospitality and good conversation. It is during their conversation that the General’s true self comes to the surface. He does not refer to himself as a person but as a “Hunter”. The fact that he refers to humans as “animals” and that he believes “life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and if need be, taken by the strong” makes his character unrealistic in today’s society (Connell 115). The hunter within the General has taken over his life in that he does not see humans, but prey. Realistically murderers and mentally disturbed people do exists in society, but it is unrealistic for a person to be so eccentric that they have devised a system of gathering the outcast of the world on their own private island to hunt for their personal amusement. I would have to hope that in today’s society a character similar to General Zaroff did not exists therefore he would be
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell: Literary Analysis
    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell: Literary Analysis

    In this scene it is the good natured Rainsford who is taken in by the General and treated with dinners, new clothes, and what he hopes is a good conversation with a fellow hunter. However, the contrasting mindset of Zarroff is quickly provided to Rainsford and the true nature of this man is beginning to set in for Rainsford when he realizes that he soon will be the prey. Rainsford is then appalled by the thought that he would be so easily converted into prey and could be hunted. His mindset says he is human and therefore can’t be hunted. He is above an animal. He repeatedly says that is its murder and this idea of hunting humans must be a grisly joke (page70). This implies to the reader that Rainsford is a man that values human life and does not consider himself on the same level as the animal species. His actions and words give the impression that he doesn’t feel he could reach the moral degeneration it would take for him to carry out the pure and murderous actions of another that the General is so easily…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    General Zaroff Character Traits
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    General Zaroff Character Traits

    All six of these quotes give evidence of General Zaroff’s strong character traits. General Zaroff is generous, complementive, and a purist. General Zaroff is the antagonist in a fictional story written by Richard Connell. The protagonist of this short story is Rainsford. Rainsford is a hunter that is well known by other hunters because he is an author of popular hunting related…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The most dangerous game
    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The most dangerous game

    Commercial fiction is meant to excite the reader, to help them escape reality and "The Most Dangerous Game" has both mystery and suspense do to the nature of the continuous adventure throughout the story. This forces the reader to continuously read on to discover the next piece of the puzzle or the next twist that may occur. This could be shown through the two characters in their continuous ultimate battle against one another, this giving the example of man vs man. The two characters include, the Protagonist, Sangor Rainsford and the Antagonist, General Zaroff. Both characters present themselves to be stock characters, Rainsford being recognized world-wide for his writing and considered to be known as the western “good guy”, whereas Zaroff is made out to be the “bad guy” a recognizable Russian, with facial elements such as his thick eyebrows along with a pointed military mustache. Russians being strong enemies to the West, this begins to demonstrate elements of good vs evil. Commercial fiction is also expected to have a defined plot, majority of the time people refer to this specific plot as “page turner”.Rainsford built a Malay man-catcher and a Burmese tiger pit to try and escape Zaroff. After these traps have been set, the reader can’t help but wonder whether it is going to serve its purpose and work in his favor. After finding out the results of the traps, you can’t help but wonder what will happen next. Towards the end of the hunt, Rainsford “leaped far out into the sea.” As the reader reads this, they can’t help but wonder what Rainsford was thinking and what was going to happen to him.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Comparison of the Most Dangerous Game with the Lottery
    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Comparison of the Most Dangerous Game with the Lottery

    In The Most Dangerous Game, Connell describes Rainsford, the protagonist, as a renowned hunter. Connell uses the opening conversation between Rainsford and Whitney, Rainsford’s companion on the yacht, to enlighten the reader to Rainsford’s attitude of indifference concerning the prey that he hunts. As fate would have it, Rainsford is marooned on an island where he meets another hunter, General Zaroff. As the story progresses, Rainsford begins to see the façade of civility disappear and the real nature of the General come to surface. The General explains how hunting man is the logical progression of their art and that they are actually kindred souls. Rainsford is appalled by the comparison of their two natures and clings to the moral high ground. That is until the General forces Rainsford to now become the prey. Rainsford, now the prey, calls upon not only his vast knowledge and experience of the hunt but also his primeval instinct of survival. Connell takes the reader through many twists and turns giving hope for Rainsford around each corner only to take it away. Due to the cunningness and resourcefulness of Rainsford, the General is given literally the best hunt of his life. In the end, Rainsford outsmarts the General…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Most Dangerous Game
    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Most Dangerous Game

    Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff are very alike in some ways. Both want to have the upper hand in an argument or situation. In the beginning of “The Most Dangerous Game”, Zaroff has the upper hand as he knows the terrain and has a threatening bodyguard. He allowed Rainsford to eat and stay at his château after he fell overboard. At the end of the story, Rainsford has the upper hand as he won “the game”, surprises Zaroff, and forces Zaroff to play the game he forced himself (Rainsford) to play.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Zaroff In The Most Dangerous Game
    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Zaroff In The Most Dangerous Game

    “Everyday I hunt, and I never grow bored now, for I have a quarry of which I can match my wits, (8).” Zaroff speaks his mind about how bored he is with hunting animals. Rainsford hunts animals because he loves the sport of hunting. “It’s the best sport in the world,” as Rainsford calls it. Considering what both men say, it shows they have different morals about hunting and life. Those two points of view about hunting go against each other as Zaroff challenges Rainsford to hunt. Another main way General Zaroff and Rainsford aren’t alike is that General Zaroff believes that humans are on the Earth to provide himself entertainment and Rainsford believes they deserve respect. General Zaroff says, “ I hunt the scum of the Earth: sailors from tramp ships--lassars, blacks, Chinese, Whites, mongrels--...,(9).” To rephrase it, Zaroff obviously gives no consideration about human life as he shows in the story. Rainsford believes the opposite of that, he says, “But they are men, (9).” in response to what Zaroff says.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Choices Made in the Dangerous Game
    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Choices Made in the Dangerous Game

    Rainsford is still totally thrilled by the hunt. He has had so much experience in hunting that his experiences have led him to write a book on hunting. Rainsford is willing to spend time, and apparently large sums of money, to pursue his game. Rainsford sees himself as the strong, and he sees the animal as weak, non-intelligent target of his hobby. Zaroff, though he considers himself strong, sees hunting not just as a hobby, but as a way of life. The General depends heavily…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hunting In Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game
    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hunting In Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game

    “You were surprised that I recognized your name, You see, I read all books on hunting published in English, French, and Russian.”(p.4, Richard Connell) This use of direct characterization shows that Rainsford is a smart, educated man, because he has written a known book about hunting. In the story Rainsford also says “Thank you, I’m a hunter, not a murderer.”(p.6, Richard Connell) This shows the reader that Rainsford knows what’s right from wrong, and how humans should be treated, rather than how Zaroff treats the men that cross his path.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Most Dangerous Game
    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Most Dangerous Game

    The short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is composed of character, setting and conflict. One of the critical themes in the short story is irony, which plays a major role in the story. There is irony in the setting, a remote jungle island, the conflict, murder verses hunting, and the characters, General Zaroff who is a crazed man-hunter and Mr. Rainsford, his prey.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Elements of Literature in Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game"
    • 655 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Elements of Literature in Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game"

    Imagine a jaguar trapped on a desolate island. Suddenly, a gunshot is heard. The jaguar turns around and sees a hunter pursuing him! It runs for cover and hides behind a bush, out of the hunter's eye, or is it? The hunter stares straight at the bush in which the jaguar lays and then walks away. The jaguar knows it's going to be hunted each day until the hunter succeeds. Its life is in jeopardy. This is exactly how Rainsford feels when he is hunted by General Zaroff. Suspense, setting, and irony make Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game" an electrifying short story.…

    • 655 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Zaroff Civilized Analysis
    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Zaroff Civilized Analysis

    In the text it says “The world is made up of two classes-the hunters and the huntees. Luckily, you and i are hunters” (p.g 40) This quote demonstrates that Rainsford divides the world into hunters (those who are civilized) and the huntees (those who are not civilized and therefore are not superior). Another reason Rainsford considers himself civilized is because before he met Zaroff and ended up on the island, he was on a yacht. Which shows that he's pretty civilized because only upper class people can afford yachts.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rainsford Character Analysis
    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rainsford Character Analysis

    “It is a very great pleasure and honour to welcome Mr. Sanger Rainsford, the celebrated hunter, into my home.” These are the first words spoken to Rainsford by General Zaroff upon his arrival on Ship-trap Island. Formally greeting Rainsford gives Zaroff an appearance of a proper gentleman; well-educated and well-mannered. But by his dark eyes, military moustache, and strong face you can also tell that he is obviously a strong leader and military general. Behind his high cheek bones, white hair and sharp nose is a strange madness not reflected by his looks. Murdering fellow human beings despite his proper look provides a stark contrast between what is seen on the outside and what personality lies on the inside.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Most Dangerous Game: Zaroff
    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Most Dangerous Game: Zaroff

    In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” the author, Richard Connell, does an outstanding job of portraying the bizarre adventure of an insane, however experienced hunter, General Zaroff. The protagonist, Rainsford, another experienced hunter from New York City, appears on General Zaroff’s island, explores, and eventually encounters with Zaroff. They introduce themselves, settle down, and begin to talk. During the talk with the general, Rainsford soon learns that the General was not only a hunter; but a murderer as well. Zaroff has lured and ceased many sailors to his island to play a game. Although, they did not hunt with the General, the General hunted them! Zaroff claimed that hunting “had become too easy”, therefore, hunting began to bore him (Connell 21).The General began to murder every single one of his victims as if he were actually hunting an animal. General Zaroff did not have any form of regretfulness or discomfort which clearly shows insanity. General Zaroff’s character is clearly sadistic and manipulative and makes the hunting of animals into a thrilling, immoral game of hunting of human life.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rainsford Quotes
    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rainsford Quotes

    "But as he forged along, he saw to his great astonishment that all the lights were in one enormous building- a lofty structure with pointed towers plunging up into the gloom." This scene describes the point in the story where Rainsford is on the island and sees the chateau. This quote lines up Rainsford to meet General Zaroff as he brings himself to arrive at his chateau. "There is no greater bore than perfection." In this scene General Zaroff and Rainsford are talking about their take on hunting when General Zaroff non-shalontly implies his psychotic opinion that it is okay to hunt humans by telling Rainsford how everything else has failed to satisfy his thrill. This quote shows the loss of interest General Zaroff is experiencing because he no longer finds hunting as a challenge. General Zaroff makes it clear to Rainsford what his interest on this island is and Rainsford suddenly finds himself in a life-threatening situation when General Zaroff wants him to take part in his…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    research paper: compare and contrast :The rocking horse winner" bylawrence, and "The lottery" by jackson
    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    research paper: compare and contrast :The rocking horse winner" bylawrence, and "The lottery" by jackson

    In Graham Greene’s “The Destructors” and Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford and Trevor (better known as T.) are each faced with a moral dilemma. Each character is confronted with a post-war scenario. While T. is immersed in it, living in a post-war London, and striving to fit in with his peers; Rainsford faces an opponent who survived the overthrow of the Czar and continued to pursue his favored sport despite societal acceptance. T. is from a higher social status than that of his peers and must find a way to fit in and earn their respect. Rainsford is shipwrecked on an island with a “big game” hunter and must survive the most challenging hunt of his life. The purpose of this essay is to compare the way these moral dilemmas affect each character, how they address the struggle, how they internalize their perception, and how they work toward resolution with their inner conflict.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics