Preview

General Petraeus: Masterbuilding The Iraqi Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
374 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
General Petraeus: Masterbuilding The Iraqi Society
General Petraeus was the mastermind behind rebuilding the Iraqi society. Petraeus came to Iraq focused on fighting a war, not rebuilding society. Petraeus believed that he and US Army troops would provide a supporting role. However, the Army ended up handling some administrative functions. Petraeus utilized his experiences and knowledge to create a culture of respect and understanding with the people who remained in Iraq after their leader Suddam Hussein left them in chaos. General Petraeus’ execution of the warfighting functions by leading, directing, and assessing operations was vital in the success of rebuilding the Iraqi society in Mosul, Iraq.
War Fighting Functions
General Petraeus was in charge of mission command war fighting functions while commanding in Mosul, Iraq. These war fighting functions encompassed movement and maneuver, intelligence, fires, sustainment and protect. The mission took a turn and revolved around rebuilding Iraqi society. The strategy to rebuild Iraq had three goals: provide a secure environment, restore basic life services, and facilitate a return to normalcy. General Petraeus clearly
…show more content…
Petraeus took responsibility for dealing with the governor and two senior Kurdish leaders. General Petraeus was responsible for providing continuous leadership throughout the operation of mission command. In Mosul, Petraeus made it clear that public safety was a shared responsibility. Not all officers and soldiers were ecstatic about the civilian assignments. General Petraeus was able to provide purpose, motivation, and direction through his leadership style by empathizing to a certain degree to reinforce the mission end state. As a leader, it is also important to be able to ask for feedback, which is what he did with a small group of individuals who he trusted and admired. As a way to keep his commanders on their toes, he would grill them and focused on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Battle Anaysis

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    a. Strategic/Operational Overview: The mission of the ground forces was to push out the Iraqi ground forces from strongholds in Kuwait City and southern Iraq in order to liberate Kuwait and regain control of its oil reserves.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership in war time is a dynamic process. No one particular commander is exposed to the same challenge and implements a textbook solution. While leadership doctrine is provided to commanders, it serves more as a guideline than anything else. This situation can be clearly seen in the leadership and management styles of General Frank Savage and Colonel Keith Davenport. Both of these individuals were faced with the challenge of leading a Bomber Group during World War II. Grossly undermanned and equipped, their directive from command was to give maximum effort and fly their assigned missions until replacement aircraft and personnel could be brought up to the front.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The aim of this paper is to analyze the ideas, theory, command, leadership and management style of Brigadier General William Billy Mitchell and draw a lesson in the context of present and future challenges.…

    • 2970 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Through leadership, commanders provide purpose, direction, and motivation to subordinate commanders, their staff, and Soldiers.” Unlike General McClellan, General Lee used his position to create an organization, which encouraged individual initiative. Lee handpicked his subordinate’s whom he trusted and who took initiative. Lee and his generals formed a mutually supportive team, where each had absolute trust in the others. They easily interchanged duties and troops among each other. “This team was responsible for survival at Antietam and major Confederate victories both before and after Antietam. Lee shared and discussed his strategy with his generals. He made the final decisions and granted his generals autonomy in carrying them out.”…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    McChrystal held multiple leadership positions in the unit throughout his career to include battalion command and eventually served as the commander of the Regiment. His experience in the organization gave him insight to their full capabilities and gave him the confidence that the unit could handle an increased role in the Global War on Terrorism.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter R. Mansoor, Baghdad at Sunrise: A Brigade Commander’s War in Iraq (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008)…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the beginning of time and into present times great leaders and decision makers have mastered the art of delegation. Over history we have seen the end product of what a great leader with delegation skills can accomplish using their most valuable resource, people. In biblical scripture examples of delegation can be seen in the choosing of “disciples” by Jesus himself in order to accomplish various tasks and missions. All great prominent generals from the times of Julies Ceaser to today’s modern generals such as David Petraeus, example effective delegation and its role in making them effective leaders. In my military time I witnessed firsthand the effective implementation of delegation and its successful outcomes. I have unfortunately also witnessed the failure and degradation of a unit’s effectiveness with poor delegation and it subsequent negative consequences. Knowing effective delegation is a timeless tool that any aspiring leader should hone and keep handy in there “back pocket” of managerial skills.…

    • 855 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People in positions of authority need good leaders to execute the mission and the job. General George S. Patton, Jr, one of the best leaders the military has had, said it best, “Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    David Petrous

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Petraeus was a four-star general who served over thirty years in the United States Army. In 2004, he was promoted to Lieutenant General. In 2007, he was promoted to General. In April of 2008, President Bush nominated General Petraeus to command U.S. Central Command headquartered in Tampa, Florida. This was quickly approved by the senate. In 2010 he was appointed to be the commanding general of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan. In 2011, a year later, he was unanimously appointed to be the Director of the CIA.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mosul Petraeus and the 101st used the counterinsurgency training that Petraeus implemented to build security and stability, using justified force when needed he also helped launch 4500 reconstruction projects in Iraq. Petraeus willingness to mentor and train leaders under him is another way that all our past leaders have helped shape our military. Each one…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the beginning of my Army career, due to the nature of my military occupational specialty, I have operated within the philosophy of “Mission Command.” As a young Soldier, I was expected to take the initiative to find stories about my unit that supported the command messages of my unit. At the time, I did not realize that I was exercising disciplined initiative and operating within the commander’s intent. Now, as I complete the Sergeants Major Academy, I have a thorough understanding of how public affairs is linked to mission command as a warfighting function. The purpose of this paper is to describe how public affairs is vitally linked to the mission command warfighting function and how applying the mission command principles will make me a more effective staff non-commissioned officer and leader.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jim Borgman's War On Iraq

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On March 19, 2003 former President George W. Bush declared war on Iraq, two years after declaring his war on terror. By the end of the year he had mobilized and shipped fifty thousand soldiers to Iraq. The political cartoon designed by Jim Borgman offers commentary on past socio-economic issues, suggesting that certain young adults risk life and limb not just for patriotism but for career opportunities. .…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military leadership isn’t simply about leading a group of individuals to accomplish the mission. On the surface it may seem this way; a barrage of loud, authoritative orders being barked out to brainwashed enlistees. This is how the preponderance of the masses that aren’t associated with the military may see us. However, it’s much, much more than that. Military leadership is about leading individuals to become something more than they ever thought they could be. To develop an individual into one of integrity and excellence. To help them reach goals they never thought possible and to consider a world beyond their own. Truly, there is no other form of leadership quite like it.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marines and Leadership

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are many awards given out for leadership; however, watching Marines succeed because of the time and effort that their leaders have invested in them can be far more rewarding than any medal or certificate. There are many different methods and theories on leadership; however, some approaches are almost universal amongst leaders. Leadership is a continuous process, which requires limitless dedication that will constantly push Marines to their limits. Leaders should know not to fraternize with their subordinate Marines because of the ramifications that this causes, such as a loss of respect for the leader, and a loss of overall discipline. Leaders should know how to approach their Marines in any situation, and strive to understand their Marines’ strengths and weaknesses in order to help the Marines improve themselves. The subordinates who have good leaders will often put forth an extra effort because their leaders have set higher standards by challenging them, and they will strive to improve their weaknesses because the leader has held them accountable for their actions. Leaders may often find themselves wondering if their leadership has had any effect on their Marines; however, it becomes quite obvious that they are being effective whenever their Marines emulate the example that has been set. Anyone can tell their subordinates to do the right thing, but it takes real leadership to convince subordinates why they should do the right thing and then ensure that they actually do it; this can be accomplished if the leader is continuously doing the right thing, and holding their Marines to the same standard. The commitment that leaders make to their Marines is eternal, and it can show them that their leaders will always be there for them no matter what.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A good leader should always have accountability for their soldiers but it starts on the lowest level. Anything to be ready and knowing the job that needs to be done. Accountability is more than just knowing your soldiers in formation. Accountability is knowing that your soldiers physical, mental, and spiritual needs are accounted for and taken into consideration; so they can be more functional as a unit, team, and be mission ready as the legs of the military; as the NCO’s being the backbone.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays