Preview

General Electric

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8692 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
General Electric
Download the original attachment
Executive Summary
General Electric (GE) is a global market leader which is well known for its technological innovation, leadership and world class quality in the conglomerate industry. For the purpose of analysing strategic management in action, this report focuses on its Aircraft Engines (hereinafter referred to as “AE”) and Medical Systems (hereinafter referred to as “MS”) business units – a subset of its ‘Technology’ segment.
Its macro-forces (sluggish economy, advent of e-business, ageing demographics) combines with the industry forces (where degree of rivalry is intense and degree of attractiveness to entrants is low-moderate) to identify 3 sets of critical success factors (CSFs) in each industry.
Findings from the internal analysis identified GE as pursuing a successful related linked diversification strategy. Results from the VRIO assessment and value-chain analysis suggest that AE and MS pursue a differentiation strategy which strongly matched the industry CSFs.
The ESC gap analysis contains insights and potential gaps, derived in relation to its: environment-strategy; strategy-performance; strategy-capability. Overall, GE’s remarkable performance and brand prestige has put them in good light. However, the gaps identified (slow conformance to e-business; inadequate preparation to meet future medical demands; inconsistent strategy to fend off rivalry and entrants) needs to be addressed to concretize its market standing. Finally, a brief recapitulation on issues identified therein completes the analysis. Contents Page 1.0 Introduction
General Electric is the world’s leading diversified industrial firm widely recognised for its world class quality, innovation and technological expertise, leadership, and brand prestige. Under Welch’s leadership, it has endured massive restructuring efforts (i.e. acquisitions, divestitures, retrenchments, shaping GE’s culture) – the pillar for its success today.
Its AE unit –



Bibliography: Allyn, D.S. 1985, ‘Conglomerate Mergers, Mutual Forbearance Behavior and Price Competition’, Managerial and Decision Economics, September, 6(3), pp. 153. Anderson, J.C. and Narus, J.A. 1991, ‘Partnering as a focused market strategy’, California Management Review, pp. 95-113. Ansoff, H.I., and McDonnell, E.J. 1990, Implanting strategic management, 2nd edn, Prentice-Hall, New York. Antony, J. 2006, ‘Six sigma for service processes’, Business Process Management Journal, Mar, 12(2), pp. 234-248. Aruskeviciene, V., Salciuviene, L. and Trifanovas, A. 2006, 'A comparison between recent and prospective critical success factors in Lithuanian printing industry ', Managing Global Transitions, 4(4), pp. 328 - 346. Barney, J.B., 1991, ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17, pp. 101. Boardman, A.E., and A.R. Vining. 1996, ‘Defining Your Business Using Product-Customer Matrices’, Long-Range Planning, 29(1), pp. 38–48. Brotherton, B., Heinhuis, E., Medema, M., and Miller, K. 2003, ‘Critical success factors in UK and Dutch hotels’, Journal of Services Research, 2(2), pp. 47–78. Buckley, A. 1975, 'Growth by acquisition ', Long Range Planning, August, 8(4), pp. 53-60. Byers, C., and D. Blume, 1994., ‘Tying Critical Success Factors to Systems Development’, Information and Management Amsterdam, 26(1), pp. 51–61. Chattopadhyay, P., Glick, W.H., and Huber, G.P, 2001, ‘Organizational actions in response to threats and opportunities’, Academy of Management Journal, 44, pp. 937-955. Chi, T., 1994, ‘Trading in strategic resources: Necessary conditions, transaction cost problems, and choice of exchange structure’, Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp. 271 – 290. Combs, J.G., and Ketchen, D.J., 1999, ‘Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: Toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics’, Strategic Management Journal, 20, pp. 867 – 888. Daniel, R. 1961, ‘Management information crisis’, Harvard Business Review, 39(5), pp. 111-21. Deeds, D.L., DeCarolis, D., and Coombs, J., 2000, ‘Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms’, Journal of Business Venturing, 15, pp. 211 – 229. Deephouse, D.L., 1999, ‘To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance’, Strategic Management Journal, 20, pp. 147-166. Dev, C.S. and Klein, S. 1993, ‘Strategic alliances in the hotel industry’, The Cornell H.R.A. Quarterly, February, pp. 42-5. Eden, C., and Ackermann, F. 2000, 'Mapping distinctive competencies: A systemic approach ', Journal of the operational research society, 51, pp. 12-20. Gerald, F.D, Kristina, A.D., Catherine, H.T. 1994, ‘The Decline and Fall of the Conglomerate Firm in the 1980s: The Deinstitutionalization of an Organizational Form’, American Sociological Review, August, 59(4), pp. 547-570. Geroski, P.A. 1999, ‘Early warning of new rivals’, Sloan Management Review, 40(3), pp. 107-116. Ginter, P.M., and Duncan, W.J. 1990, ‘Macroenvironmental Analysis for Strategic Management’, Long Range Planning, December, 23(6), pp. 91-100. Grant, R. M. 1998, Contemporary strategy analysis: Concepts, techniques, applications, 3rd edn, Blackwell, Malden. Hall, R., 1992, ‘The strategic analysis of intangible resources’, Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp. 136 – 139. Hanson, D., Dowling, P.J., Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Hoskisson, R.E. 2005, Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalisation, Thomson Learning, Victoria. Hill, C.W.L., & Jones, G.R. 2007, Strategic Management, 7th edn, Houghton Mifflin, Boston. Hitt, M.A., Keats, B.W., and DeMarie, S.M Hubbard, G. 2000, Strategic management: Thinking, analysis and action, Prentice Hall, NSW. Hubbard, G., Pocknee, G., and Taylor, G. 1996, Practical Australian strategy, Prentice Hall, Sydney. Ireland, R.D., and Hitt, M.A. 1999, ‘Achieving and maintaining strategic competitiveness in the 21st century: The role of strategic leadership’, Academy of Management Executive, 13(1), pp. 43-57. Johnson, S. and Scholes, K. 2002, Exploring corporate strategy: Text and cases, 6th edn, Prentice-Hall. Kotler, P. 1998, Marketing Management – Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 9th edn, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. Kumar, V., Simon, A Learned, E.P., Christense, C.R., Andrews, K.R., and Guth, W. 1969, Business Policy, Homewood, Irwin. Leidecker, J.K., and Bruno, A.V. 1984, ‘Identifying and using critical success Factors’, Long Range Planning, 17(1), pp. 23–33. Lowendahl, B., and Revang, O., 1998, ‘Challenges to existing strategy theory in a postindustrial society’, Strategic Management Journal, 19, pp. 755-773. Medical Imaging, 2000, ‘Business Profile: GE Medical Systems’, Ascend Media, November, viewed 15 March 2007, . Porter, M. E. 1979, ‘How competitive forces shape strategy’, Harvard Business Review, March / April, 57, pp. 137 - 45. Porter, M.E. 1980, Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York. Porter, M.E. 1985, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, Free Press, New York. Porter, M.E. 1988, ‘Managing Value: From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy’, The McKinsey Quarterly, pp. 43-59. Porter, M.E. 1994, ‘Toward a dynamic theory of strategy’, in R.P. Rumelt, D.E. Schendel and D.J. Teece (eds), Fundamental Issues in Strategy, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, pp. 423 – 61. Prahalad, C.K., and Hamel, G. 1990, ‘The Core Competence of the Corporation’, Harvard Business Review, 68(3), May-June, pp 79-93. Prior, V. 1999, ‘The language of competitive intelligence, Part Four’, Competitive Intelligence Review, 10(1), pp. 35-70. Quesada, H., and Gazo, R. 2007, 'Methodology for determining key internal business processes based on critical success factors: A case study in furniture industry ', Business Process Management Journal; Feb, 13(1), pp. 5-20. Ramaswamy, K., 1997, ‘The performance impact of strategic similarity in horizontal mergers: Evidence from the U.S. banking industry’, Academy of Management Journal, 40, pp. 697-715. Reeds, R. and DeFillippi, R., 1990, ‘Casual ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 15, pp. 88 – 102. Riyad, E., Ibrahim, E. and Mohamed, Z. 2006, 'Making Business-to-Business International Internet Marketing Effective: A Study of Critical Factors Using a Case-Study Approach ', Journal of International Marketing, 14(4), pp. 87-109. Rochart, J.F. 1979, ‘Chief Executives Define Their Own Data Needs’, Harvard Business Review, 57(2), pp. 81–92. Rumelt, R.P. 1974, Strategy, structure and economic performance, Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Spillman, B. & Lubitz, J. 2002, ‘New estimates of lifetime nursing home use: Have patterns of use changed?’, Medical Care,  40(10), pp. 965-975. Thompson, A.A., Strickland, A.J., and Gamble, J.E. 2005, Crafting Executing Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage, Concepts and Cases, McGraw-Hill, New York. Varadarajan, P.R. and Jayachandran, S. 1999, ‘Marketing strategy: an assessment of the state of the field and outlook’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), pp. 120-43. Watlers, B.A., and Priem, R.L. 1999, ‘Business strategy and CEO intelligence acquisition’, Competitive Intelligence Review, 10(2), pp. 15-22. Wheelen, T.L. and Hunger, J.D. 2000, Strategic Management Business Policy: Entering 21st Century Global Society, 7th edn, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Willard, F.M. 1969, ‘Firm Conglomeration as a Market Structure Variable’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, December, 51(5), pp. 1488-1494. Williams, J.R., Paez, B.L., Sanders, L. 1988, ‘Conglomerates Revisited’, Strategic Management Journal, September / October, 9(5), pp. 403.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    18. Wilson, R. and Gilligan, C. 2005. Strategic marketing management: planning, implementation and control. 3rd ed. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. pp. 390-402.…

    • 3046 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Barney, J. ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’. Journal of Management Vol. 17 pp 99–120. (1991)…

    • 2493 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    • Luffman, G., Lea, E., Sanderson, S. and Kenny, B. (1996) Strategic Management, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc.…

    • 6821 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Resourceing Talent

    • 3347 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Bibliography: Barney, J (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of Management, Vol 17, pp 99-120…

    • 3347 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grant, R. (1991), “A resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implication for strategy formulation”, California management Journal, vol. 33 No.3, pp. 114-35.…

    • 20742 Words
    • 83 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Amihud, T. and B. Lev (1981), ‘Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate Merger’, Bell Journal of Economics, Autumn 1981, pp. 605-617.…

    • 30125 Words
    • 121 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    General Electric

    • 60500 Words
    • 242 Pages

    Chapter 1 explores the concepts surrounding organizational strategy. It begins with an explanation of the term strategy and offers a basis for how to identify a company’s particular strategy. Next, it explores the importance of striving for competitive advantage in the marketplace and examines the role strategy plays in achieving this advantage. The chapter then explores the idea that strategy is partly proactive and partly reactive. Next, a discussion on strategy and ethics is given. This is followed by a close look at the relationship between a company’s strategy and its business model. The chapter proceeds forward with a look at what makes strategy a winner and then presents reasons for why crafting and executing strategy are important. The chapter concludes with thoughts on the equation: good strategy + good strategy execution = good management.…

    • 60500 Words
    • 242 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    General Electric

    • 2372 Words
    • 10 Pages

    General Electric is a company who strives to put their best foot forward. For more then 120 years, General Electric has been number one in the products they sell. From airplane engines to light bulbs, their attitude has been admired not only in America, but worldwide. GE serves customers in more than 100 countries and employs more than 300,000 people worldwide. After all GE has accomplished, including revenues of 152.4 billion dollars in 2004, the company still maintains a healthy relationships with its customers.…

    • 2372 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    General Electric

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. General Electric uses a multifaceted approach to help make them one of the industries leaders in engine production. This approach includes resources both financially and managerially. Financially General Electric has invested $50 million in new engine technology, with an additional $1.2 billion to $1.4 billion being required to help them bring new engine designs to the forefront. General Electric has also received a $20 million grant from NASA in order for them to create the first tester UDF engine. General Electric’s Aircraft Engine Business Group (AEBG) manages the production of GE’s engine technology. AEBG has successfully put together a list of resources including Boeing, McDonnell Douglas, and others in an attempt to put their engine group at the front of the market. According to industry segmentation models, General Electric’s AEBG occupies around $4.7 billion in revenue sales. Using the segmentation model it is also clear that AEBG’s profitability is net yearly earnings of $381 thousand. In order to develop a good product, AEBG spends a lot of time making sure that the area of research and development is given close attention. AEBG invested 20% of its total revenue in company funded research and development, which is a high amount, even in the high technology sector of aircraft engines. To properly develop the new UDF engine, General Electric will have to spend $1.2 billion to $1.5 billion. This is after an initial investment of $50 million. General Electric will be able to use their AEBG division as a vital resource in making the UDF engine a real possibility. GE will also take advantage of their current relationships with major companies like NASA, Boeing, and McDonnell Douglas to help with the production and development of their new UDF engine. General Electric can afford this venture if it sells well enough early to overcome the initial investment. In order to successfully do this 400 aircraft would have to be sold within the first…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: Aaker. D.A & McLoughlin. D, 2007. Strategic Market Management: European Edition. UK: John Wiley & Sons…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marketing Audit Tesco

    • 2433 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Wilson. R. M. S & Gilligan. C. (2005), Strategic Marketing Management: Planning, Implementation and Control, 3rd Ed Butterworth-Heinemann…

    • 2433 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Barney, J., (1991), 'Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage ', Journal of Management, 17, 99-120…

    • 4387 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D. and Hoskisson, R.E (2003a) Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalisation, Mason, OH, Thomson South-Western.…

    • 2716 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Analysis of Capitec

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Porter, M. E., et al. (1996). "From competitive advantage to corporate strategy." Managing the multibusiness company: Strategic issues for diversified groups, New York: 285-314.…

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    3. Porter, M.E. , 2008. “The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy”, Harvard business Review, January 2008.…

    • 3034 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics