The presentation of both genders are not egalitarian. The goal of Gilman’s novel was not to show her own gender biases, but instead to show the disparity between men and women. Most of what Gilman is asking for is that men have an understanding of a woman’s point of view. She wants people to see that women are just as capable when given the chance; this chance has been oppressed for so many years that people forgot. Women are placed into unrealistic roles that leave them unsatisfied and frustrated with life. As these arguments for male superiority were presented, the fact that they aligned so closely with cultural beliefs meant that they held within themselves the potential for revision and redefinition. Since male supremacy is culturally constructed, there is opportunity for change to happen. One society becomes educated, there is opportunity to build a de-gendered …show more content…
She believed men were the sole bearers to economic responsibility, which distributed an unequal balance of dependency and power on the men by women. Women’s work, on the other hand, did not generate any income, and therefore devalued the weight of her contribution, usefulness, or skills needed for childrearing and housework. Furthermore, causing women to rely on men’s provisions. Gilman describes a woman’s false consciousness as tacitly obeying the rules and expectations of both genders, created by men. It is particularly the point about autonomy that displeases Gilman. It is not only the point of relying on the husband, but also it is losing a woman’s ability to think and be in