Gender gap in current school enrolment: selection among ”irregular” student?∗ Michel Tenikue†
Many developing countries face a pro-male gender gap in schooling, as boys are more likely to be enrolled at school than girls. This paper examines whether the current enrolment gap prevails at the same time among ”regular” and ”irregular” children. Regular children are children who complete primary education between the age of 12 and 15 years. Irregular children are the rest. We investigate the gender gap in schooling empirically using data provided by the 2001 Cameroon Household Survey. The empirical framework allows for a diﬀerent gender eﬀect among regular and irregular children. It also accounts for selection into the two groups. Results show no male-female diﬀerence among regular children. Among irregular children however, females are more likely to stay out of schools. We therefore suggest that, independently of the source of the gender gap, it seems to be at work mostly among irregular children.
I began work on this paper while visiting the University of British Columbia. I am grateful to Siwan Anderson, Patrick Fran¸ois, Ashok Kotwal, Jean-Marie Baland for helpful comments. I would also like to thank Frederic c
Gaspart, Sylvie Lambert, Primila Krishnan, Vincenzo Verardi, Miguel Urquiola, Hanan Jacoby, David McKenzie and seminar participants at ECRU UCL.
It is widely recognized that, irrespective of the gender, investments in education have positive eﬀects individual income and productivity. Unfortunately, in many developing countries, a promale gender gap is still observed in schooling (Orazem and King, 2008, World-Bank, 2008, Dar, Blunch, Kim, and Sasaki, 2002). Closing this gap is a priority for many governments1 and is included in the Millennium Developments Goals.
The literature has suggested many sources of the gender gap in school enrolment: preference or parental discrimination (Kingdon, 2002), market incentives such as the male-female diﬀerences in the opportunity cost of time spent at school and the male-female diﬀerence in future earning prospects (Kingdon, 1998, Munshi and Rosenzweig, 2006), social norms about gender roles in familial relationships (Orazem and King, 2008, Rosenzweig and Schultz, 1982, Lahiri and Self, 2007). The driving forces of the gender gap cited generate a similar gender eﬀect across diﬀerent groups of children. Particularly a similar gender eﬀect is expected among children of who started their educational process with a delay and those who did not, children who have repeated grades and those who have not. In this paper we investigate whether the gender gap in school enrolment is alike among on one hand, children who feature late enrolment or who have repeated grades and on the other hand, children with a regular course of study. In the sequel, we refer to the words ”regular” and ”irregular” to identify two groups of children. Regular children are those who complete primary education between the age of 12 and 15 years old. Irregular children are the rest, namely children who have not completed primary education by the age of 15. They have faced at least one of the following irregularities: delayed enrolment, repeating a grade, or interruption in the course of study.
We use data provided by the 2001 Cameroon Living Standards Measurement Survey (LSMS) and examine the gender gap in current school enrolment rates among children aged 12 to 19 years. We start at the age 12 for two reasons: (1) in general primary education is completed around the age of 12, (2) in our data, there is almost no male-female diﬀerence in school enrolment rates up to the age of 112 . Indeed, in our database 82% of children aged 6 to 11 years old are enrolled at school and this enrolment rate is split into 83% for boys and 81% for girls3 . To reﬁne the distinction between regular and irregular...
References: Alderman, H., and E. M. King (1998): “Gender diﬀerences in parental investment in education,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 9(4), 453–468.
Baland, J.-M., and J. A. Robinson (2000): “Is Child Labor Ineﬃcient?,” Journal of Political
Banerjee, A. V., and A. F. Newman (1993): “Occupational Choice and the Process of
Development,” Journal of Political Economy, 101(2), 274–98.
Basu, K. & Van, P. H. (1998): “The Economics of child labor,” The American Economic
Review, 88 (3), 412–427.
Becker, G. S. (1971): The Economics of Discrimination. The University of Chicago Press,
Bedi, A. S., and J. H. Marshall (2002): “Primary school attendance in Honduras,” Journal
of Development Economics, 69(1), 129–153.
Behrman, J. R., D. Ross, and R. Sabot (2008): “Improving quality versus increasing
the quantity of schooling: Estimates of rates of return from rural Pakistan,” Journal of
Bommier, A., and S. Lambert (2000): “Education Demand and Age at School Enrollment
in Tanzania,” The Journal of Human Resources, 35(1), 177–203.
Cameron, S. V., and J. J. Heckman (1998): “Life Cycle Schooling and Dynamic Selection Bias: Models and Evidence for Five Cohorts of American Males,” Journal of Political
Economy, 106(2), 262–333.
(2001): “The Dynamics of Educational Attainment for Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites,”
Journal of Political Economy, 109.
Dar, A., N.-H. Blunch, B. Kim, and M. Sasaki (2002): “Participation of Children in
Schooling and Labor Activities: A Review of Empirical Studies,” Social protection discusion
Dreze, J., and G. G. Kingdon (2001): “School Participation in Rural India,” Review of
Development Economics, 5(1), 1–24.
Fafchamps, M., and J. Wahba (2006): “Child labour, urban proximity, and household composition,” Journal of Development Economics, 79 (2), 374–397.
Garg, A., and J. Morduch (1998): “Sibling rivalry and the gender gap: Evidence from child
health outcomes in Ghana,” Journal of Population Economics, 11, 471–493.
Evidence and Interpretation,” World Development, 36(9), 1623–1646.
Hersch, J., and L. S. Stratton (1997): “Housework, Fixed Eﬀects, and Wages of Married
Workers,” The Journal of Human Resources,, 32(2), 285–307.
INS, and O. Macro (2005): “Enqute D´mographique et de sant´, Cameroun 2004,” Rapport,
Kingdon, G. G. (1998): “Does the Labour Market Explain Lower Female Schooling in India?,”
The Journal of Development Studies, 35(12), 39–65.
(2002): “The gender gap in educational attainment in India: how much can be explained?,” The Journal of Development Studies, 39(2), 25–53.
Kodde, D. A. (1986): “Uncertainty and the Demand for Education,” The Review of Economics
and Statistics, 68(3), 460–67.
Lahiri, S., and S. Self (2007): “Gender Bias in Education: the Role of Inter-household
Externality, Dowry and other Social Institutions,” Review of Development Economics, 11(4),
Lillard, L. A., and R. J. Willis (1994): “Intergenerational Educational Mobility: Eﬀects
and State in Malaysia,” Journal of Human Resource, 29(4), 1126–1166.
Lina, A., A. Simon, and K. John (2006): “Why Do Girls in Rural China Have Lower School
Enrollment?,” World Development, 34(9), 1639–1653.
Manacorda, M. (2006): “Child Labor and the Labor Supply of Other Household Members:
Evidence from 1920 America,” American Economic Review, 96(5), 1788–1801.
Mare, R. D. (1980): “Social background ans school continuation decisions,” Journal of the
American Statistical Association, 75(370), 295–305.
Munshi, K., and M. Rosenzweig (2006): “Traditional Institutions Meet the Modern World:
Caste, Gender, and Schooling Choice in a Globalizing Economy,” American Economic Review,
Orazem, P., and E. M. King (2008): “Schooling in Developing Countries: The Roles of
Supply, Demand and Government Policy,” in T
Pal, S. (2004): “Child Schooling in Peru: Evidence From A Sequential Analysis of School
Progression,” Journal of Population Economics, 17(4), 657–680.
Psacharopoulos, G., and H. A. Patrinos (1997): “Family size, schooling and child labor
in Peru - An empirical analysis,” Journal of Population Economics, 10(4), 387–405.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002): Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT
Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
World-Bank (2008): “World Development indicators,” Wdi online, The World Bank Group.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document