J Appl Physiol 91: 225–230, 2001.
Gender differences in carbohydrate loading are related to energy intake MARK A. TARNOPOLSKY,1,2 CAROL ZAWADA,2 LINDSAY B. RICHMOND,2 SHERRY CARTER,1 JANE SHEARER,3 TERRY GRAHAM,3 AND STUART M. PHILLIPS2 1 Departments of Medicine (Neurology and Rehabilitation) and 2Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5; and 3Human Biology and Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G ZW1 Received 5 July 2000; accepted in ﬁnal form 6 April 2001
Tarnopolsky, Mark A., Carol Zawada, Lindsay B. Richmond, Sherry Carter, Jane Shearer, Terry Graham, and Stuart M. Phillips. Gender differences in carbohydrate loading are related to energy intake. J Appl Physiol 91: 225–230, 2001.—We demonstrated that female endurance athletes did not increase their muscle glycogen concentration after an increase in the dietary carbohydrate intake (58 3 74%), whereas men did (Tarnopolsky MA, SA Atkinson, SM Phillips, and JD McDougall, J Appl Physiol 78: 1360–1368, 1995). This may have been related to a lower energy or carbohydrate intake by the women or due to an inherent gender difference in glycogen storage capacity. We examined whether well-trained men (n 6) and women (n 6) increased muscle glycogen concentration after an increase in both the relative (58 3 75%) and absolute energy and carbohydrate intake and whether potential gender differences were related to muscle hexokinase enzyme activity. Subjects were randomly allocated to three diets [Hab, habitual; CHO, high carbohydrate (75%); and CHO E, extra energy CHO (1 34%)] for a 4-day period before a muscle biopsy for analysis of total and pro- and macroglycogen and hexokinase activity. Total glycogen concentration was higher for the men on the CHO and CHO E trials compared with Hab (P 0.05), whereas women increased only on the CHO E trial compared with Hab (P 0.05). There were no gender differences in the proportion of pro- and macroglycogen or hexokinase activity. A low energy intake may explain the previously reported lower capacity for women to glycogen load compared with men. sex difference; hexokinase; glycogen; ergogenic aids
AN INCREASING NUMBER OF STUDIES are ﬁnding gender differences in the metabolic response to endurance exercise (6, 10, 15, 17, 22–24). Consistently, studies have shown that women have a lower respiratory exchange ratio (RER) compared with men during submaximal endurance exercise (6, 10, 15, 17, 22–24). Animal data suggest that the female sex hormone 17- -estradiol may mediate these metabolic differences (5, 12, 13, 18). The aforementioned gender differences could have implications for nutritional recommendations for female athletes. For example, our laboratory previously
reported that female endurance athletes did not increase muscle glycogen concentration in response to an increase in dietary carbohydrate intake from 58 to 74% of energy intake, yet men showed an increase with the same dietary modiﬁcation (23). Furthermore, a recent study has also found that women increase muscle glycogen in response to a high dietary carbohydrate intake “but the magnitude was smaller than that previously observed in men” (25). Both groups proposed several mechanisms to explain the apparent gender difference in carbohydrate loading. First, dietary energy intake is lower in women compared with men, even when expressed relative to lean mass (17, 23). This translates into a lower carbohydrate intake for women compared with men when expressed relative to fat-free mass (FFM; the largest pool of glucose disposal). For example, we found that the carbohydrate intake for men was 7.7–9.6 g kg FFM 1 day 1 and for women was 5.9–7.9 g kg FFM 1 day 1, when the subjects increased their carbohydrate intake from 58 to 74% of energy intake (23). The majority of studies examining carbohydrate loading have been conducted using predominantly or exclusively male subjects, and the carbohydrate intake on the high carbohydrate diet was usually...
References: 1. Adamo KB and Graham TE. Comparison of traditional measurements with macroglycogen and proglycogen analysis of muscle glycogen. J Appl Physiol 84: 908–913, 1998. 2. Adamo KB, Tarnopolsky MA, and Graham TE. Dietary carbohydrate and postexercise synthesis of proglycogen and macroglycogen in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 275: E229–E234, 1998. 3. Bergstrom J, Hermansen L, Hultman E, and Saltin B. Diet, muscle glycogen and physical performance. Acta Physiol Scand 71: 140–150, 1967. 4. Burke LM and Hawley JA. Carbohydrate and exercise. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2: 515–520, 1999. 5. Ellis GS, Lanza-Jacoby S, Gow A, and Kendrick ZV. Effects of estradiol on lipoprotein lipase activity and lipid availability in exercised male rats. J Appl Physiol 77: 209–215, 1994. 6. Friedlander AL, Casazza GA, Horning MA, Huie MJ, Piacentini MF, Trimmer JK, and Brooks GA. Training-induced alterations of carbohydrate metabolism in women: women respond differently from men. J Appl Physiol 85: 1175–1186, 1998. 7. Gauthier JM, Theriault R, Theriault G, Gelinas Y, and Simoneau JA. Electrical stimulation-induced changes in skeletal muscle enzymes of men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24: 1252–1256, 1992. 8. Green HJ, Fraser IG, and Ranney DA. Male and female differences in enzyme activities of energy metabolism in vastus lateralis muscle. J Neurol Sci 65: 323–331, 1984. 9. Hansen PA, McCarthy TJ, Pasia EN, Spina RJ, and Gulve EA. Effects of ovariectomy and exercise training on muscle GLUT-4 content and glucose metabolism in rats. J Appl Physiol 80: 1605–1611, 1996. 10. Horton TJ, Pagliassotti MJ, Hobbs K, and Hill JO. Fuel metabolism in men and women during and after long-duration exercise. J Appl Physiol 85: 1823–1832, 1998.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document