Gay-Williams Arguments Against Euthanasia
Euthanasia is the performance of ending a person’s life so that a person can become free from a pain and illness. Euthanasia is also a contravention issue that some people are in favor of or against it.
Gay-Williams is against euthanasia and presented one of his arguments that related to self-interest. He wanted to prove through his argument that euthanasia, which is in self-interest, is immoral. When a person deals with euthanasia, dying is an ending life that cannot be undone or will be permanent. Although medications are commonly used to treat disease and illness, they can be misused when people are being given the wrong medicines. Additionally, people might think that having infections causes the process of dying and that they may not …show more content…
She had been in the hospitals for days and weeks in order for the doctors and nurses to remove or stop the tumor. However, the solution was temporary, so the doctor offered Brittany an estimation that she would live about 5 to 6 months. She had tried everything to stop cancer, but there was no cure. She also didn’t want her family to see her suffering from this painful disease. Brittany had been suffering for months and had to make a decision; as a result, she decided to do a study about death with dignity. This research helped her to find the solution for her and her family. Therefore, Brittany moved to another state to process her desire, wish even though the process was lengthy. After experiencing this moving process in order to get that prescription from a physician, she felt a relief that she no longer had to deal with her pain. Before taking this prescription to the process of dying, she wanted to celebrate her husband’s birthday and her family during her final weeks before she died. Nevertheless, she was asking questions about why people had to tell her that her choice was wrong, she shouldn’t follow that procedure, and she should listen to other opinions because people think they are
Gay-Williams is against euthanasia and presented one of his arguments that related to self-interest. He wanted to prove through his argument that euthanasia, which is in self-interest, is immoral. When a person deals with euthanasia, dying is an ending life that cannot be undone or will be permanent. Although medications are commonly used to treat disease and illness, they can be misused when people are being given the wrong medicines. Additionally, people might think that having infections causes the process of dying and that they may not …show more content…
She had been in the hospitals for days and weeks in order for the doctors and nurses to remove or stop the tumor. However, the solution was temporary, so the doctor offered Brittany an estimation that she would live about 5 to 6 months. She had tried everything to stop cancer, but there was no cure. She also didn’t want her family to see her suffering from this painful disease. Brittany had been suffering for months and had to make a decision; as a result, she decided to do a study about death with dignity. This research helped her to find the solution for her and her family. Therefore, Brittany moved to another state to process her desire, wish even though the process was lengthy. After experiencing this moving process in order to get that prescription from a physician, she felt a relief that she no longer had to deal with her pain. Before taking this prescription to the process of dying, she wanted to celebrate her husband’s birthday and her family during her final weeks before she died. Nevertheless, she was asking questions about why people had to tell her that her choice was wrong, she shouldn’t follow that procedure, and she should listen to other opinions because people think they are