Preview

Gay Marriage Societal Suicide Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
117 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gay Marriage Societal Suicide Analysis
Charles Colson wrote the article “Gay Marriage: Societal Suicide” in 2004 claiming gay marriage will only lead to family break down and higher crime rates in America. Five states had “mocked” state laws and constitution by making it legal for same sex marriage causing instant news media in these areas (Massachusetts, California, New York, Oregon, and New Mexico). Therefore, president Bush announced his Federal Marriage Amendment trying to reinsure the traditional importance in marriage; to unite two individuals (opposite sex) and reproduce. Unfortunately, in America when children are raised in broken homes and grow up without knowing or being raised by their father’s statistics show higher crime rates, murder rates, teen pregnancy, and high
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Allowing Same-Sex Adoption
    • 4000 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Allowing Same-Sex Adoption

    Murphy, Timothy F. "Same-Sex Marriage: Not a Threat to Marriage or Children." Journal of Social…

    • 4000 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pa250 Unit 1
    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pa250 Unit 1

    One of the basic rights we hold sacred in this country is the freedom to marry whomever we choose. While that seems like a given in the US, because we don’t have the strict class hierarchy of Europe, or the arranged unions found in certain Eastern and African cultures that define who marries whom. We have had, and still do for that matter, rigid restrictions on marriage, when they seem counter-intuitive to social mores. When social feelings begin to shift towards a more progressive outlook, challenges to the status quo are bound to occur, especially when the emotionally charged aspect of marriage is involved. Two perfect examples are the cases of Loving v. Virginia 388 US 1, 87 S Ct1817(1967), and Goodridge v. Department of Public Health 440 Mass 309, 798 NE 2d 941(Mass.2003).…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary: The Secular Case Against Gay Marriage
    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Summary: The Secular Case Against Gay Marriage

    "The Secular Case Against Gay Marriage." The Tech (M.I.T.) February 20th, 2004: "Homosexual relationships do nothing to serve the state interest of propagating society, so there is no reason to grant them the costly benefits of marriage. [...] When a state recognizes a marriage, it bestows upon the couple certain benefits which are costly to both the state and other individuals. Collecting a deceased spouse's social security, claiming an extra tax exemption for a spouse, and having the right to be covered under a spouse's health insurance policy are just a few examples of the costly benefits associated with marriage. In a sense, a married couple receives a subsidy. Why? Because a marriage between to unrelated heterosexuals is likely to result in a family with children, and propagation of society is a compelling state interest. For this reason, states have, in varying degrees, restricted from marriage couples unlikely to produce…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Gay Marriage: How Jonathan Rauch Offers It as a Common Good
    • 2792 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Gay Marriage: How Jonathan Rauch Offers It as a Common Good

    The marriage-rights movement headed by gay rights activists has been a relevant issue on the American socio-political docket since 1970 following the Stonewall riots in New York City, New York in June of 1969. The riots sparked an initiative for gay people to join the movement of other marginalized groups in a quest to counteract widespread alienation to obtain the equal treatment and recognition they deserved. Today those activists joined by a whole new generation of proud homosexuals are still fighting for the right to be able to walk down an isle and commit their minds, bodies, and souls to the one they love in front of the people they love and have it be more than an impotent symbol of affection; they want their union to be recognized both socially and legally as a different but equal lifestyle choice. They want to partake in marriage, not "marriage". The most familiar argument that we hear today in the war fought by traditionalists and activists is the argument for the purpose of marriage. Traditionalists like Rick Santorum would argue along the lines that the purpose for marriage is children. Most gay activist would argue that the purpose for marriage is finding love in a lifelong companion. In Gay Marriage: Why It Is Good For Gays, Good For Straights And Good For America, Jonathan Rauch, an openly gay male, explains how gay marriage would be a universal good. Marriage has evolved over the years “nearly beyond recognition”[1] from wealthy aristocratic polygamy used to impose socially structured dominance over women, to a business merger whose main goal was financial security for women and a pool of family ties, to an institution bent on maintaining social norms and gender specialization, to our present marriage where love, an unstable chemical reaction, is on the forefront of the reasons to marry.[2] He argues that the marriage portrait is not as distinctively black and white as some would…

    • 2792 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Same Sex Marriage: Societal Suicide By Charles Colson
    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Same Sex Marriage: Societal Suicide By Charles Colson

    The topic of same sex marriage is one that causes great debate in today’s society. There are many views on weather it should or should not be allowed and the effects it could have on the United States if it were allowed. The debate has been an ongoing one and as more states begin contemplating legalization the debates have become more heated. In an article written by Katha Pollitt, entitled What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage? , she argues for the legalization of same sex marriage making a multitude of valuable points. In an opposing article entitled Gay “Marriage”: Societal Suicide by Charles Colson her argues in opposition against same sex marriage using statistics and history to make his valid points. Both writers argue their points exceptionally but Pollitt’s essay is the better one as it is incredibly fair and reasonable and argues the opposition’s points perfectly.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Decline And Fall Of The Case Against Same Sex Marriage
    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary Of Decline And Fall Of The Case Against Same Sex Marriage

    The excerpt written by Andrew Koppelman, “The Decline and Fall of the Case Against Same-Sex Marriage,” is a strong stand against those opposed to gay-marriage. Koppelman shows the powerful legal and moral case for gay equality, but argues that courts cannot and should not impose it. Koppelman argues that gay-marriage should be a right to all and believes that those that don’t believe gays have rights are “tongue tied.” Others argue that gay-marriage is wrong because it demeans the sanctity of the word marriage and makes a mockery of God’s creation of man and woman to procreate. Koppelman refutes this idea and many more in favor of the ban against gay-marriage by showing how others sexual preference should influence another’s household.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Doma Unconstitutional
    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Doma Unconstitutional

    Synopsis: The article is written by former US President Bill Clinton who in 1996 signed the Defense of Marriage Act which stated that marriage is defined as being between Man and Woman. What this means for gay couples is that they cannot enjoy the benefits that heterosexual couples have such as the ability to file taxes jointly, equal family benefits when it comes to pensions and health care and other federal statuses (Clinton 2013). While same-sex marriage is legal is several states it is not recognized by the Federal Government due to the DOMA. Bill Clinton who originally signed it states that he no longer supports it and says that “DOMA and opposition to marriage equality are vestiges of just such an unfamiliar society” (Clinton 2013). While he was signing DOMA he made sure to make the statement that it should not be taken as an act of discrimination and now 17 years later in 2013 he admits that the law itself is discriminatory and that it should be overturned in court.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Media Bias
    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Media Bias

    The New York Times’ article about the Supreme Court taking up the same-sex marriage issue was clear and accurate. There were good statistics about states’ involvements in the on-going debate. There were hyper-links to other topics related to this article such as Social Security benefits, estate taxes, Proposition 8, and domestic partnerships in specific states. The facts that were reported in this New York Times’ article were specific and detailed enough to gather the message of the topic being presented. Other facts that support the topic, although not detailed in this report, allow for readers to research further at their own will, using the provided links.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Marriage and Individuals
    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marriage and Individuals

    Both authors have some similar perspectives on the same sex marriage topic; one of them being sociological views and the matter of same-sex couples. In addition, both Evan and Andrew believe that family and friends who support and understand gay couples have a major positive on same sex marriage. Both authors discussed that many gay or lesbian children are being raised in a non-gay environment and that has a negative impact on the lives of children. The differences between Wolfson and Sullivan’s viewpoints are that Sullivan emphasizes the individual citizen, and Wolfson emphasize the importance of same-sex marriage. Some people are still ignoring the fact that our society is changing and evolving rapidly. Same-sex couples have been suppressing their voices throughout many decades, and now they are ready to fight for their freedom and the right to be married.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Homosexuality and Gay Marriage
    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Homosexuality and Gay Marriage

    If there is anything that gets me riled up and ready to debate, it’s the controversial topic of gay rights and those who appose them. In Charles Colson and Anne Morse’s essay opposing gay marriage, “Societal Suicide,” they express that marriage should be seen as a “traditional building block of human society.” It goes on to explain their tired and bias conclusion that marriage is a bond that should only be between a man and a woman. At the same time, they question the extinction of marriage because of same-sex couple’s oppressed desire to happily marry each other. How is making it legal for supporters of marriage and gay people in love to express their bond considered the end of marriage? Allowing gays to marry would not only promote marriage, but it would support the obvious right and humane decision to care for every citizen with liberty and justice for ALL! “Societal Suicide” explains that gay marriage is not only wrong, but goes against the natural order of the family system, as well as promotes “broken families” and crime amongst young people without mothers or fathers, all the while, weakening the meaning and status of heterosexual marriage. I do not believe in any reason for keeping people from being who they are if there is no harm being done to others. Gay marriage should absolutely be legalized because we all deserve equal rights regardless of skin color, religion, ethnicity, occupation, or sexuality.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gay Rights Legislation Paper
    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gay Rights Legislation Paper

    Hodges that state limitations on same-sex marriage violates the Fourteenth Amendment, making all state bans on same-sex marriages illegal. This Supreme Court decision took the decision of gay rights legislation, when it comes to marriage, out of the hands of the states, making it a federal issue. This ruling made it legal for same-sex couples to marry in all 50 states. The problem with the rulings, though, was that it did not provide instructions on implementation within the individual states (Duke, 2015). This paper will focus on legislation on the Federal level and will cover issues and rights that the LGBT community has been fighting for. As you will read later in the paper, marriage is not the only rights that the LGBT community lacked, there were many policies that passed through the United States government to get the country where it is today in terms of…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage Argumentative Analysis
    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gay Marriage Argumentative Analysis

    Whether an individual is against gay marriage or for it, we all have an opinion on the issue. Andrew Sullivan’s describes how marriage as a basic need for individuals no matter their sexual orientation. However, William Bennett believes that “same- sex marriage would do significant, long term social damage” (1138). Whether we like it or not gay marriage influences marriage institution, culture, and their children.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rogerian Argument on Same Sex Marriage
    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rogerian Argument on Same Sex Marriage

    Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage Bias Essay
    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gay Marriage Bias Essay

    Eric Zorn’s newspaper article, “Change of Subject: The Top Six Arguments against Gay Marriage”, tells about six popular arguments against gay marriage, and explains how he believes each is not valid. Zorn wrote this article to persuade opponents of same sex marriage to agree that it should be legalized, and he informs about changes in our society and why he believes gay marriage should be one of these changes. Zorn is trying to tell how over time we have created and destroyed traditions and that gay marriage should be legal because it is harmless to society contrary to popular beliefs that it could lead to legalizing polygamy or that homosexuals have immoral behavior. The author’s bias is shown in this article to be pro same sex marriage because he believes it is not morally wrong because it does not harm anyone. Zorn also states in the introduction, “I 've been informally debating opponents of legalizing same-sex marriage for nearly 20 years…” (Zorn).…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Benefits of Marriage Equality
    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Benefits of Marriage Equality

    Cited: Eskridge, William W Jr. and Darren R Spedale. Gay Marriage: For Better or For Worse. New…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics