Preview

From Arrest to Adjudication

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1853 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
From Arrest to Adjudication
Many training take places yearly to provide discussions to the importance of searches that are mandated under federal laws and in dealing with the legal ramification that are in support of the searches. There are plain understandings to the process in which warrants are sought after and issued that are required within the Fourth Amendment. Probable cause is well defined to what standards are set and met.

Not all search warrants are equal but they must be very specific in their origin and at the same time they are very intrusive. If you suspect fraud with a business and you want to obtain the corporation business records it would not be easy to obtain a search warrant but if the search is for trying to uncover or locate drugs or even a weapon it would be rather easy to obtain the search warrant. When you are trying to obtain a search warrant; the Fourth Amendment has to be taken very seriously, because the individuals rights must be respected, there should be no papers looked through or seized during unreasonable searches, their effect must not be tampered with, and nor should they be violated under no circumstances. A warrant that is being issued or obtain should be detailed and specific of its origin, affirmation or Oath shall support the warrant, and if there’s no probable cause no warrant shall be issued (United States Senate, 1996).

Before a search warrant will be issued or sought after, the investigator must be able to demonstrate two things: they must show that a crime took place and that a probable cause does exist and they must be able to entail that there’s physical evidence can be found at a specific location that is indicated in the warrant that constitute probable cause. As long as these two requirements are met there will no reason that a judge would not sign off on the warrant. The judge will review the warrant and make his/her sound judgment to whether or not a warrant will be issued and under these circumstance will a judge approve of a



References: Bodenharner, D., (2009.) Exceptions to Search Warrant Rules Answers.com. Retrieved on January 25, 2013 from http://www.answers.com/topic/exceptions-to-search-warrant-rules Court of Appeals of Iowa, (2001). Andrew Dean Skola, Defendant-Appellant Iowa Judicial Branch. Retrieved on January 26, 2013 from http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/court_of_appeals/recent_opinions/20010523/00-1183.asp?Printable=true Grosso, A., (2009). Search Warrant Applications from the ‘Lectric Law Library’s stacks. Retrieved January 23, 2013 from http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cri12.htm Law Info, (2008). When is a Search Warrant Necessary Quality Legal Services You Can Count On. Retrieved on January 26, 2013 from http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Articles/Criminal-Law/Federal/when-is-a-search-warrant-necessary.html Lectlaw.com, (2013). Probable Cause retrieved on January 26, 2013 from http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/p089.htm Schmalleger,F.(2007). Criminal Justice Today An Introductory Text for the 21st Century (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. The Missouri Bar, (2006). Search and Seizure Civics Library of the Missouri Bar. Retrieved on January 24, 2013 from http://members.mobar.org/civics/Searches.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    4th Amendment protects your right against unreasonable search and seizure of property, papers, or people without valid probable cause…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Govt201 Unit 1 Amendment

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4th Amendment - Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause as determined by a neutral judge or magistrate…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After looking at the totality of the circumstances it is concluded that if a defendant consents to a search, even without being advised he is free to go, the search will be…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Over time, technology has impacted the police and other law enforcement agencies with new devices for gathering evidence. These new tools have caused constitutional questions to surface. One particular case in Oregon of an individual (DLK) aroused such question. DLK was suspected of growing marijuana inside of his home. Agents used a thermal imager to scan DLK’s residence form the outside. The results indicated heat, just like the kind that is generated by special lights used for growing marijuana indoors. Constructed by the scan, a judge issued a search warrant. A warrant – a legal paper authorizing a search – cannot be issued unless there is a cause, and a probable cause must be sworn to by the police officer or prosecutor and approved by a judge. A warrant must describe what is being searched and what will be seized. 100 marijuana plants were found finalizing the arrest of DLK; however, did the scan violate DLK’s Fourth Amendment rights? The Fourth Amendment states, “The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall be issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Constitution). This amendment touches on the expectation of privacy in your home and person. The government is not unable to search you, your home, your belongings, or take your belongings, also known as a seizure, without a good reason. A person’s Fourth Amendment rights may at times seem to delay the world of law enforcement. If the police feel that they have…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case study

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reason: The general rule allowing warrantless search of the person of an arête and of the area. "Within his control is based upon a policy judgment.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Other conditions on the searches incident to arrest exception include the use of force, the search of other individuals with the arrested individual, searching the vehicle of an arrest person, contemporaneousness and inventory searches "if a government agent has probable cause to believe the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime without a warrant" because "in the time it would take to get a warrant, the car, driver and contraband or evidence could be long gone" (Harr, Hess, 2006. p. 231). The 1981 case of Robbins v. California saw the justifications for searching without a warrant. Those specifications include that the mobility of vehicles produce exigent circumstances.…

    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The following paper reviews probable cause as it applies to the duties of law enforcement. We will review different scenarios involving probable cause and the different court rulings that govern police and other law enforcement officer’s procedures involving the searching of a residence, arresting offenders, and the use of warrants. Due, to the inconsistency and complexity involved in real life situations, a multiplicity of use involving warrants, probable cause, searches, and other police actions can occur.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pettrey, J.D., M. T. (2012, March). FBI ? The Exigent Circumstances Exception After Kentucky v. King. Retrieved July 15, 2013, from http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/law-enforcement-bulletin/march-2012/the-exigent-circumstances-exception-after-kentucky-v.-king…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fahrenheit 451 Unit 5

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To obtain a search warrant, law enforcement officers must convince a judge that they have reasonable grounds to believe a search will reveal evidence of a specific illegality.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Therefore, the Exclusionary Rule and fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine was created as an important protection of the Fourth Amendment. This paper has discussed the Exclusionary Rule, fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, and the difference between the two. It has also discussed the civil liability that officers may be subject to for their mistakes and how they may be forgiven from liability if their mistake was objectively reasonable or if it was made in good faith. Lastly, the author has discussed the importance of obtaining a search warrant when available and how this seemingly simple procedural step will prevent the suppression of evidence, as well as, protect the officer and agency against any civil liability. Although many times officers’ conduct searches under the emergency exception of the warrant requirement, it is generally a lackadaisical excuse which can hardly be defended. In modern times with the inception of recent technology it has become quicker and easier to obtain search warrants, either telephonically or by electronic means. Therefore, it should be instilled in officers through academic and field training to always secure consent or a search warrant prior to conducting a search in order to protect themselves and the integrity of the…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Circumstances which should suggest to a police officer that a search warrant is not valid include:…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Search Warrants

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A search warrant must always be based on probable cause. We can define probable cause by facts or circumstances that would lead a person to believe that the place needs to be searched for important pieces of evidence to be found (Swanson 35). The probable cause is established by what is called a written affidavit prepared by the law enforcement officer or investigator. In the affidavit, the officer states all known facts and circumstances involving the suspects and items that are expected to be found. An affidavit contains 3 main parts that need to be described: the person, the property, and the facts. The search warrant must always describe in particular the place that is being searched. The description must be detailed enough to where the place being searched can easily be distinguished from any other place. It can be very easy to confuse one property with another; this is why it is extremely important for the description of the building to be very detailed and accurate.…

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    People in the United States attend court every day for different many reasons. Those reasons could be for traffic violations, civil law suits, or for unlawful criminal acts. No matter what they are all handled and disputed in a court of law. Courts are empowered to make fair and binding decisions upon the facts that are received. There are two types of courts; civil court and criminal court. It is very important that people understand and know the differences between civil and criminal courts. Civil courts handle resolutions between private parties and usually consist of one party suing the other for some type of monetary damages. Criminal courts on the other hand, try alleged offenders for suspected crimes committed, whereas the end result is either freedom for the offender or a prison cell.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The criminal justice system works in such a way that certain behavior or actions are legislated as a criminal offense wherein the state or the federal government can prosecute an offender even if only being suspected. In this case, there exists rules or limits into which protection are of highest concerns. It does not only apply to civilian suspects but also extends to actual prisoners, and to those who are on parole and under probation. But in reality, it has become a worldwide issue in terms of illegal searches. It has even been stipulated in the U.S. Constitution 's Bill of Rights stating that these restrictions start on the premises of the rights to refuse to testify against oneself, the right to confront one 's accuser and the right to a trial by jury for people charged with crimes. But these federal protections may not always seem to hold especially when police enforcers are dealing with prisoners, people on parole and on probation status. This happens because the jurisdictions regarding these matters depend on the ruling court. The court regulates and decides whether the legislative rule, court practice or police action is permissible under the federal and state constitutional law. From here, we can say during the course of searches, we should be aware and vigilant of possible violations by the apprehending police officers. In such cases, knowledge of the legality, technicality and the law should at least be required or at least explained to the person being searched. As mentioned a while ago, the case becomes quite sensitive for people who are imprisoned, on parole and under probation. The situation for them is very difficult in the sense that they are…

    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Syndrome-Based Defenses

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Schmalleger, F., Hall, D. E., Dolatowski, J. J. (2010) Criminal Law Today. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays