When I worked for this Greek restaurant us the waitress’s had issues of ethical dilemmas all the time with our boss. He had no respect for women and showed this all the time by offering all of us, at different times, if we would do sexual favors for him for exchange of new apartments, and offering to buy new cars, and cash every week besides our paychecks. As a group we got together to discuss what we should do if anything, and in this case we all needed our jobs to support our families.
We could not just up and quit our jobs. Most of the group decided not to do anything, or say anything to anyone. Myself and one other decided to tell him no, and report him to the owner, and the next day we were fired from our jobs, and mailed our checks. For me to go against the group I lost my job, but my moral and ethic values would not let me remain at the job with that kind of treatment going on.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
By most definitions, if we are persuaded by an individual, we are said to be obedient to that individual. If we are persuaded by a group, we are said to have conformed to that group’s objectives. Compare and contrast the core differences between these two concepts. In what ways do group and individual persuasion techniques differ? As social beings, why are we naturally prone to conformity and obedience?…
- 567 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
What is the influence of other group member's opinions on the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of an individual. What if we are not sure how to act in a certain situation. As stated in the text "we know other people conform, we underestimate the extent to which we can be induced to follow the group" (Aronson, p.23,2012). Groups have influence on ambiguous and unambiguous situations. In an individualistic culture, such as that of the US, conformity connotes something negative. However as a society we still need to master the world, and be connect by others. Thus people conform to the opinion of other group members and yield to social norms. As stated by Aronson,…
- 346 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Having a social rule is not a bad thing, it helps everyone understand how to behave. Furthermore by complying with the social norm it provides a level of respect to others. No one wants to be that guy who just can’t get along. Conforming to the group is a way to flow downstream, but sometimes you’re up the creek without a…
- 1121 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Conformity is a social influence in which an individual changes their beliefs or behaviour in order to fit in with another individual or group. This fulfils the need to feel accepted and not outcast which can increase the individuals self esteem. Conformity can be demonstrated by a change in the individual’s clothes, language or attitude etc. to adapt to the group; thus displaying the desire to be a group member. It indicates to the group that ‘I am not a threat as I am like you and following your rules’. It gives the group a sense of security as the consistency of a conformists behaviour allows members to predict what each one will do. Members of a conformist group may…
- 2535 Words
- 11 Pages
Best Essays -
Personally, I have experienced situations where myself or others will agree with whatever the majority of the crowd is doing. In today’s society, most people want to fit in and be seen as ‘normal’.…
- 565 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Conformity within a group entails members changing their attitudes and beliefs because of real or imagined social pressure in order to match those of others within the group. (Passer & Smith, 2003)…
- 932 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
- Group Pressure: how a group has influence over an individual to change their own beliefs and behaviour to fit in with the majority.…
- 2722 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
So many people take social conformity for granted that not many bother to find out why it is such a powerful phenomenon and why so many people submit to this force without any resistance.…
- 1559 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
In “Opinions and Social Pressure,” social psychologist, Solomon Asch, concludes his findings of numerous experiments conducted to reveal the impact of peer pressure among the individual. His experiments consisted of seven to nine college students; one who was the focal subject of the experiment and the rest who were members of the group instructed to answer accordingly. After many trials and the introduction of different variables, Asch finds that a person who is presented with a partner in his independency, has a higher chance not to conform to the majority. Asch concludes, “With [the partners] support the subject usually resisted pressure from the majority: 18 of 27 subjects were completely independent. But after six trials the partner joined the majority. As soon as he did so, there was an abrupt rise in the subject’s errors” (Asch 181). The subjects do not conform once a partner resists conformity as well, however, as soon as their partner joins the majority, then they begin to join also. Author, Catherine Sanderson, provides reasoning as to why the subject conforms as soon as his partner does. In her book, “Social Psychology,” she presents strategies for resisting obedience. Sanderson claims, “People who are aware of the situational pressures that lead people to obey authorities are more likely to stand up to…
- 1780 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
conformation is extremely common. Also, in some cases people may conform to much in a potentially dangerous situation, and could hurt themselves or someone else. Take the Jim Jones Cult for…
- 158 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Imagine the following situation: you are in a classroom and the teacher has asked the class a question. You have got one answer to the question, but you see majority of the students raising their hands for a different answer to the same question. What would you do? Would you go along with your own answer or would you change your mind and go along with the majority thinking that if majority of the people have the same answer then the answer must be correct? Most of the people would change their minds and follow the majority. In psychology, conformity is defined as the tendency to change our perceptions, opinions, or behavior in ways that are consistent with group norms (Brehm, Kassin, and, Fein 213), also simply known as “following the crowd”.…
- 1351 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
It is a type of social influence involving a change in belief or behavior in order to fit in with a group. This change is in response to real (involving the physical presence of others) or imagined (involving the pressure of social norms / expectations) group pressure.…
- 445 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Social conformity can destroy your health in many ways. It can suppress the immune system and cause stress, lead to depression, cause emotional deprivation, prevent you from making healthy decisions, and lead to you doing thoughtless, dangerous acts. Although there are only five here, there are more physical and emotional consequences of conforming to group expectations due to fear and disapproval. Conforming to a group that’s against or unsure of your beliefs and values you believe in just because you want to fit in automatically creates anxiety because you are trying to be and think like someone you are not. Social conformity also increases your chance of not making healthy decisions. Like when you are at a party and there’s alcohol. You…
- 251 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This kind of conformity is known as ‘’Social control’’- the numerous pressure as individuals grow turns them from babies into members of our society. The main agencies of social control are the family, the peer group, the media, religion, employment and the law. All of these encourage conformity of one kind or another. The conformity types of behaviour are called ‘’social norms’’…
- 1380 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Society trusts those that conform, and distrusts those that don't. One advantage of conforming to societies expectations is that you gain trust from the society. People who don't conform aren't trusted. One disadvantage is that you join the group, so you're not technically an individual anymore in your own right. In the novel The Crucible, Arthur Miller explains the causes of hysteria, mob mentality, scapegoating by showing the conflicts within a society.…
- 972 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays