Preview

Freedom: John Stuart Mill

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1374 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Freedom: John Stuart Mill
1. John Stuart Mill: Freedom

Freedom is generally defined, by a dictionary, as the condition or right of being able or allowed to do, say, think, etc. whatever you want to, without being controlled or limited (Cambridge). This means there is no interference or influence in ones’ actions or opinions by anyone else. There is no domination or dictatorial government who affects these actions or opinions. John Stuart Mill, an English philosopher and economist, gives a similar view on freedom as the Cambridge dictionary, and looks at the ‘nature and limits of the power which can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual’ (Mill, 6).
Mill’s view of freedom, as he writes in his book On Liberty, is that “Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign,” (Mill, 13). By this he means that an individual is free when they make independent choices, have independent opinions and have independent actions. When a person thinks and acts without the influence of outside opinion, a person exercises his or her own freedom. Mill divides human liberty into three regions. The first is the ‘domain of the conscience’ and ‘liberty of thought and feeling,’ (Mill, 15). The second is the ‘liberty of tastes and pursuits,’ and ‘framing the plan of your life’ (Mill, 16). The third region is ‘the freedom to unite, for any purpose not involving harm to others’ (Mill, 16). He states that if a society has a respect for these three regions of human liberty, then a society is free (Mill, 16). ‘The only freedom which deserves the name, is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it’ (Mill, 16).
However, he states that if an individual exercises their freedom in a way that threatens harm to another, there should be interference to prevent harm from being done. He asserts that the only time anyone can interfere with or exercise power over an individual’s liberty is



Bibliography: Horwitz, Steven. "Hayek and Freedom." The Freeman. May 2006. 13 Sept. 2011. <http://www.thefreemanonline.org/>. Lukes, Steven. Power: a Radical View. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. McKinnon, Catriona Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty: 1859. 4th ed. London: Longman, Roberts & Green, 1869 Roberts, Andrew. "Friedrich Hayek and Freedom." Study More. Middlesex Universty, 2007

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Mill begins his essay by expressing a concern with the amount of control that society can exert over an individual 's liberty. Mill is afraid of the "the tyranny of the majority"1 and suggests that one should protect himself not only from the tyranny of the state itself, but also from the prevailing opinions of the majority. He says that the opinions of the majority become the rules and laws…

    • 2441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    J.S. Mills had numerous examples when he proclaimed, “liberty is often granted where it should withheld, as well as withheld where it should be granted” (Mills 103). Everybody deserves liberty as long as they do not harm other individuals in the process. People should have the ability to do in their own concerns, but people should not be free to exercise power over another individual. In chapter five in On Liberty, this obligation is almost utterly disregarded in the instance of family relations. In these instances the actions can harm other individuals in the society and that is why it is the State’s responsibility to make sure that these harms do not occur. For example, Mill asserts that the State should have the ability to enforce education…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Stuart Mills believed very strongly in individual liberty and freedom. However I think that it is first important to state that Mills did not believe in unlimited liberty. He thought that this would lead to conflict, and therefore he believed that government was essential. He believed that the role of the government should be to protect citizens from such conflict, yet still allow for individual liberty and progress.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no on else; hence the exercise of the natural right of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Devlin to Mill.

    • 1787 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill perceives only one instance in which society is justified in interfering with or limiting the freedoms of its adult members, that being to prevent harm to others. Though Mill would…

    • 1787 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The goal of government, in the eyes of Mill, should be to allow citizens to freely pursue happiness and freedom without restriction. Mill believed that the roll of government should be to protect the happiness of the citizens and ensure that their personal happiness is not jeopardized in any way. Personal…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Stuart Mill once said, “The amount of eccentricity in a society has generally been proportional to the amount of genius, mental vigor, and moral courage it contained. That so few now dare to be eccentric marks the chief danger of the time.” John Stuart Mill is one of the most prominent English-speaking philosophers during the 19th century. His works incorporated a huge range of topics in his articles and papers he has written, in which a few of them include A System of Logic, On Liberty, and Utilitarianism. Mill’s main goal when composing On Liberty was best seen by taking a gander at how he talked about his work in his Autobiography. Mill composed that he accepted On Liberty to show the significance to man and to the society, of an extensive variety on sorts of character, and the opportunity given to human instinct to extend itself in…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill vs Dworkin

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "I forego any advantage which could be derived to my argument from the idea of abstract right as a thing independent of utility. I regard utility as the ultimate appeal on all ethical questions; but it must be utility in the largest sense, grounded on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being". Mill does not argue that liberty is a right but rather that giving people liberty has beneficial consequences. Mill thinks that paternalism does not serve the utilitarian purpose (to provide the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people) because the extent that “the most ordinary man or woman” knows about him or herself “immeasurably surpassing” anyone else. Any effort from the state to interfere, even from good intention, tends to lead to “evil” rather than good, since no one knows or cares more about his own interest than himself. As a result, “Mankind are greater gainers by suffering each other to live as seems good to themselves, than by compelling each to live as seems good to the rest”. The state should not interfere at all, except for when the act can harm others (Mill’s Harm Principle).…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Mill “The only freedom which deserves the name, is that of pursuing our own good…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Js Mills Conformity

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In “Principles of Political Economy & On Liberty,” J.S. Mills states that you have as much liberty as is consistent with other people therefore humans are inherently individuals. You are free to do what you please and to pursue your own idea of the good, so long as you do not harm another or prevent them from pursuing their good. Humans are naturally individuals, which is good because it is essential to the cultivation of the self. A basic problem that Mill sees with society is that individual spontaneity is not respected as having any good in itself, and is not seen as essential to well-being. Mills writes that in early stages of society, it is possible that there could be too much individuality.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mill’s Utilitarianism states that in order to be moral, one must make decisions based upon the greatest happiness. In…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is America Really Free?

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Freedom is defined as the state of being free or at liberty rather than in confinement. It is the power to determine action without restraint and the exemption from external control, interference, and regulation. Americans, these days, commonly regard their society as the freest and the best in the world. Their understanding of freedom has been shaped and based upon the founding fathers’ belief that all people are equal and that the role of the government is to protect each person’s basic “inalienable” rights. The United States Constitution’s Bill of Rights assures individual rights including freedom of speech, press, and religion. America has changed dramatically from the country our founding fathers discovered. Some could even argue that we’re not really free at all anymore.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay “On Liberty”, John Stuart Mills discussed his Harm Principle. He states that, “the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others” (Mill 239). This means that Mills believed that the government had no right to force any person to do anything, unless it would protect others from harm.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay Utilitarianism written by John Stuart Mill, Mill presents the claim that happiness is the only thing that is good. Meaning that all happiness leads to pleasure through out our lives and can be noticed by the absence of pain. In this essay I will further explain Mill’s view on happiness and how it is connected to the Utilitarianism view. I will then define my own objection of Mill’s arguments and why it is a compelling objection to think about.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberty And Equality

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From the beginning of the relationship it is already understood that we have freedom as humans, so long as our actions do not harm the other person involved in the relationship, this is implied in Equality and generally accepted as a concept by parties involved. Nowhere is the concept of equality more radical than in the ideas of Marx and his Communist Manifesto, decrying the bourgeoisie for its unremorseful control and force of their liberty on the ever growing proletariat. The person who stood me up is the “bourgeoisie, [and] therefore, produces, above all…its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable”. Assuming this person continuously repeats this cycle of standing up their dates a group of people will form, decrying the unethical treatment of human beings. Equality eventually demands itself to be heard in these types of situations, whether it be personal relationships or struggles between economic classes. Communism lends the idea that the “liberal society of representative democracy combined with free market capitalism represents oppression rather than freedom for the vast majority of those living under it”. The key component here being the liberty with which the Bourgeoisie set up these systems of unregulated trade using the proletariat as pawns for their liberal ideals, but inequity grows here and is ignored to a point where the date analogy will repeat itself, revolution begins and equality is demanded. A strong central government that people discard complete liberty to in the name of complete equality sounds too idealistic, and downright utopian, but the verisimilitude of that is not what is important. The importance lays in the attempt of equality. Even Hobbes, cynical as he was, believed “from this equality of ability ariseth equality of hope in the attaining of our ends”. Equality promises that…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays