Preview

Freedom Is Not License but Wisdom to Choose What Is Right for Oneself

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
641 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Freedom Is Not License but Wisdom to Choose What Is Right for Oneself
'What is a license? It is an award given to you for your effort of learning something. You go to a training school, after you pass whatever it is, you apply for a license that gives you right to use your knowledge you gain. So, the vermin say that freedom is not an award given to you, but those who created it by dying so called for you give you the right to use it wisely.

Choosing what is right for oneself means that you have to choose the path of those who created this freedom for you. It means that you are their slaves and that you will pay dearly if you depart from their way. So the people of re chose this word. People create words according to the gods they serve and that give them the idea or their resources. Since everyone is parasitic, so freedom is parasitic. So freedom was not created by man and for man, it is created by parasitic man for parasites.

Remember that we live in a parasitic world and that everyone is infected. No longer people are people. They claim to be temples and what is in them the parasites claim to be whatever they came from. For example, a parasite that came from a crocodile, such as mites, infect a person, than the person claim to be a crocodile. Our soft skin and our blood make us victim of all vermins that can bite in our environment. All vermins that bite us infect us and we start thinking that we are not ourselves but the vermins that bite us. For example, a spider bites you and you start behaving like a spider. So since worms can enter people's body and infect their ability to think and bacteria enter people in the form of dust, people are no longer themselves but whatever live in them. That is why you see people that have been bit by insects living on bat claim to be vampires.

So, parasites take people and send them to die at war for their countries. People don't have countries since they claim to be temples of their gods. Since bacteria are the gods of earth, and since bacteria infect everyone by living in them, so no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay Question: Freedom and lack of Freedom existed side by side in English colonies. Using examples from Pennsylvania and elsewhere demonstrate how greater freedom for some colonists meant less freedom for others. 300 to 600 words…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Freedom Isn't Free

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When our founding fathers were drafting out the Declaration of Independence they knew then that the British were not going to take our stance for independence without a fight. Even before the first signature was placed upon our countries most valued document they knew there would be bloodshed. But, deciding to fight for our own freedom was the only way we could govern ourselves and make our own laws without British rule. By breaking free of Britain we were able to worship the way we wanted to, we had the freedom to speak openly, we could live and build our homes where we wanted them.…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anthem Literary Analysis

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The term freedom itself can hold so much power in society. It is what drives a society to succeed or die. Freedom means individuality,…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Cone

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This freedom cannot be bought, inherited or given, but it must be taken, by force, in the attempt…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Parasites are organisms that use other organism for its survival. They draw nourishment and other needs from its host organism. Parasites that cause infection and disease are known as Pathogenic parasites.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a word, freedom is not absolutely free. If you want to enjoy your freedom, you must do what you should…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant, a soft determinist, said that in order to make a moral decision we must have freedom. Kant believed that the ability to make moral decisions lay within the existence of freedom; stating that if we are not free to make our own decisions those decisions could not be moral as we were never free to make that decision in the first place. Kant thought that a person could be blamed for an action if they could have acted differently; for example if a person’s family is held at gunpoint and they are forced to open a safe they cannot be blamed as they did not have a choice. If we are to have free will we must have the ability to make a decision that is unhindered; Kant believed that we must have free will if we are to be help morally responsible for our actions, if God did not give us free will then our decisions cannot be considered immoral or moral as we would have had to act in the way we did. Thus we cannot be held responsible; a good moral action cannot be praised as you had no other option, whilst an immoral action cannot be punished as once again there was no free choice.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Limits of Freedom

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There have been many limits to people’s freedom since America was discovered. One that stands out to me the most is the limiting of a person’s freedom because they are a slave or an indentured servant.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I feel that some freedom is passed down from our ancestors. Yet we have to earn some in society. Every generation has to earn freedom in some way. Whether it be a minor way or a big way. Earning freedom may not be as difficult as earning it back in the 1800s, but we still earn it. We may not notice it but people judge on your acts on others and yourself, and that affects your…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Freedom is like a dog without a leash, To hold it back from running through the grass, What rights do you think that goes along with freedom? People say freedom is the right to do whatever you want or to do whatever you please. But it's true isn’t the way people think it is. Freedom is the right to what you want in life, where to live and what to believe in without harming any rights of people.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parasites are living microorganisms that live and breed in living cells tacking over excising cells and fighting good bacteria, antibiotics cannot kill the parasites (viruses) but good bacteria in the body can kill the parasite (virus) helping the body to create antibodies…

    • 1091 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves; and, under a just God, can not long retain…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    actually humans and other organisms that are constantly under attack by parasites. Parasitism is a…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of liberty is a complicated one in that it has many variations from race to colony to even individuals. Puritan John Winthrop however stressed that the most impure form of liberty was one he labelled as natural. Natural liberty, as described by Winthrop was the “liberty to do evil” (65 Foner). In a sense, it was the liberty to be able to act without restraint. However, natural liberty entails that mankind has as much right to do good as he is to do evil. As described by Winthrop, the problem with natural liberty is that unchecked freedom will eventually “make men evil.” (qtd. in 77 Foner)…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Freedom

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In What is Freedom Hannah Arendt argues that freedom is related to “the political realm” rather than “the inner domain”. Arendt points out in the opening of her essay the need to “eliminate the greatest and mist dangerous difficulty, namely, that thought itself, in its theoretical as will as its pre-theoretical form, makes freedom disappear – quite apart from the fact that it must appear strange indeed that the faculty of the will whose essential activity consists in dictate and command should be the harborer of freedom.” (Arendt 439) What’s the logic behind Arendt’s opposition to the notion that equals freedom to free will? What’s the “theoretical” and “pre-theoretical form” of thought according to Arendt? And why would she contend that thought makes freedom disappear?…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays