Preview

FREEDOM AND EQUALITY: CLASSICAL LIBERALISM VS. FACISM AND NATIONAL SOCIALISM

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2543 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
FREEDOM AND EQUALITY: CLASSICAL LIBERALISM VS. FACISM AND NATIONAL SOCIALISM
The concept of both freedom and equality play equally large roles in the ideologies of Classical Liberalism along with Fascism and National Socialism. Although freedom and equality play such large roles in these ideologies, they also play very different roles in each ideology. Freedom is defined as the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint 1. Equality, on the other hand is simply defined as the state of being equal 2. Classical Liberalism is based off the ideologies of John Locke, Adam Smith, and Immanuel Kant. These three figures helped develop the ideology of Classical Liberalism and ensured that freedom and equality would play a major positive role in the ideology. On the contrary, Fascism and National Socialism is the complete opposite of Classical Liberalism. Developed predominantly by Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler, the ideology of Fascism and National Socialism is completely against the concept of freedom and equality.

The ideology of Classical Liberalism is extremely opposed to political totalitarianism. Classical Liberalism is firmly against having rulers/leaders who determine the rights and freedoms of their populations. The main objective of the ideology is to avoid the excesses of state of nature. John Locke once stated that “the unconstrained power of one in command of 100,000 is worse than arbitrary power of 100,000 individual single men.” 3 Locke firmly believed in this because he thought that one man who is in power of many other men could cause much more damage than that of a large group of individuals with equal power. A huge concern for Locke was determining a set of principles and rules in which political institutions must follow in order to benefit the majority of individuals.4 One of Locke’s more interesting ideologies is that of the state of nature. Locke believes that people are born as equals with the capacity to reason and generate ideas.5 It essentially



Bibliography: 1) freedom: definition of freedom in Oxford dictionary (British & World English)."Oxford Dictionaries. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Oct. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Classical liberals believe in negative freedom. This is the simple belief in an absence of external constraints on the individual and that they should be left alone to make their own choices. In this way classical liberals were heavily influenced by the natural rights theories of John Locke and Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson claimed that we were born with certain “inalienable” rights and therefore no individual or government had the right to constrict them or take them away. Freedom from constraints is therefor an essential condition for exercising these rights. In practice this has meant that classical liberals have advocated a minimal state, what John Locke referred to as the ‘night watchman state’. The states activities should, in his eyes, be limited to the enforcement of contracts, maintaining order and protection from foreign threats to prevent the state from infringing on individual liberties as much as possible. On the other hand, modern liberals have advocated a more positive interpretation of freedom. Positive freedom can be defined as the ability to achieve true self-mastery and self-realisation in order to fulfil our individual potential. Modern liberals such as TH Green criticised negative freedom on the grounds that it failed to address the social and economic factors that can prevent individuals from achieving their full potential. Negative freedom was inadequate because it failed to remove these barriers to true self-mastery such as social disadvantage and inequality. Modern liberals have therefore proposed an enabling state. Rather than a ‘necessary evil’ as classical liberals believe, the state can be a force for good by protecting individuals against social and…

    • 1082 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Locke’s’ piece, Of the State of Nature Chapter II, he emphasizes the positive views of human nature. Locke supports a no-government form of rule. He believes that man can rise above injustice and keep a fully functioning society without rule or as he puts it they can have “A State of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit…..” (Locke). If you give man the freedom to make his own decisions and choices he will make the correct ones. Freedom of choice is what is needed to keep a society intact and functioning, individuals in a society need to feel as if they are in charge of their own destiny. The natural rights of life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness are backed up by the notion of freedom and choice of…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 201 Week 1 Quiz

    • 651 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The answer can be found in the section “How Does Contemporary Liberalism Compare with Classical Liberalism?”…

    • 651 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The source argues that in the name of protecting civil liberties, the mass people have too much of a say over things, and that those strong leaders in power do not "get a chance to serve the common good." The ideology presented in the source is that a single, strong leader provides more stability than a democracy. The source presented advocates in favour of a collective, authoritarian form of government. The philosopher Thomas Hobbes would have supported the source by referring to society's need for a "leviathan" or centralization of power, since he believed that people were incapable of governing themselves. However, this source is not a complete rejection of the values and principles of liberalism as it still maintains democracy as the system of government used, and democracy is…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberals, no matter classical or modern, believe in small state. As Thomas Paine put it: "Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil". This concept links nicely with the idea of democracy, which literally means "rule by people". Liberals have defended democracy on the grounds that people must have a way of protecting themselves against the government and its actions. This type of democracy is also referred to as protective democracy. Moreover, democracy opens an ability for people to choose. In a pure democracy, for instance, people would vote on every occasion and policy, hence the core liberal idea of individualism would flourish in its fullest. However, in modern society it is practically impossible to have pure democracy, so we have to resort to participatory democracy. This still support the idea of individualism, as each vote counts towards the end result.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first source, John Locke present a cautionary notion regarding the pursuit of Classical Liberalism. He advises that without the government intervening and providing citizens with security, tyranny will prevail. Similar to Classical Liberalism, Locke advocates for individualism and precedence of “natural rights” including; the right to life, liberty and property. These were deemed as inherent rights, and ones to take priority over others. Moreover, during the 17th and 18th century, the focus of Classical Liberalism was to limit the amount of laws that could be passed, and thereby unhindered the restraints on individuals.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people of Liberalism “defined themselves in opposition to conservatives on one end of the political spectrum and revolutionaries on the other” (page 680). It supported freedom of religion, movement, conscience, assembly, and the press. In ensured equality for every man before law and God. In person has an equal opportunities for success or failure. Even though Liberalism was not a political movement, followers still believed that a good government had a balance of power between branches, property restrictions for representative government, and representatives were educated and successful.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical Liberals of the time was very much defined by the policy of free markets, Private Property rights, and civil liberties. Some of these classical liberals didn’t believe in economic liberty. During these earlier years of fermenting political ideas, these right was not universal. Even though the right was not for all, these policies were…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In an effort to reimagine politics and diverge from the fanciful teachings of the ancients, three optimistic realists emerged to begin a philosophical revolution. The garden of modern politics was begun by Machiavelli who cleared the land of the stones of antiquated virtue and tilled the soil. Then came Hobbes, who added the fertilizer of enlightened self-interest, the water of reason, and the seeds of human nature. Finally came Locke who, upon seeing that Hobbes’ seeds had grown into weeds of despotic monarchy, ripped them from the ground and replaced them with the seeds of liberalism. What Locke viewed as weeds, Hobbes viewed as the form of government most conducive to stability and peace. Locke’s Second Treatise of Government provides an argument against absolute hereditary monarchies while exalting liberalism as the paradigm of politics.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Classical liberalism is much like individualism. Classical liberalist believes that the government should have a limit and that individual liberty it what matters most. Individual liberty including freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly, and free markets are all good examples of what classical liberalism would consist of. Classical liberals do not like for the government to interfere with their personal lives. They stress instead reliance on private initiatives or the free market to determine the best outcomes. (p. 3) Classical liberals are individuals who like to put themselves before anything or anyone. Therefore, when I think classical liberalism, I think about a saying my sister always say “let me do me while you do you”. Classical liberals do not trust the government 100%, but they respect the government.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modern and Classic liberals both believe in the basic concept of ‘natural rights’ – the concept being that everyone is born with a set of rights that provide liberty – however, to see where they differ one must examine their views in more depth. Classical liberals support the idealistic idea of everyone being born equal and being able to exert their rights as they see fit. Modern liberals on the other hand take a more realistic view, that not everyone is born into wealth; some are born into severe poverty and therefore cannot exert their rights. They believe that there is a need for equality of opportunity and realise that the significance of circumstance is that it results in a ‘natural selection’ type society, where only the fittest survive. They try to counter this by advocating the welfare state, and ways of increasing personal liberty, a modern example being their campaigning to change the…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Liberalism or the New Morality movement of the 1920s was based on the concept that all humans are deservant of independence and fairness, and affected a major part of the American society with gender, caste/creed and sexual orientation aspects. Changes in the spheres of fashion, personal preferences and lifestyle changes, education and professional aspirations became apparent, thus leading to the end of simplicity, giving way to…

    • 67 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Liberalism is the model of analysis in international relations stressing the capacity of states to coexist and interact peacefully and harmoniously. Socialism is the ideology that argues that citizens are best served by policies focusing on meeting the basic needs of the entire society rather than by policies focusing on serving the needs of individuals as individuals. The difference between the two is that liberalism is a belief that the government should only minorly interfere within the daily lives of its citizens and that socialism will assure an equal distribution of wealth and goods to the population.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The themes of this week included, liberalism which has two strong commitments to individual freedom: commitment to freedom as an intrinsic value and commitment to individual freedom its recognition of freedom. However, classical liberalism is a political ideology that values the freedom of individuals, including the freedom of region, speech, press, assembly, and markets, as well as limited government. It was developed in 18th century Europe and first drew on Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations, and then the growing notion of social progress. If so, what are some of different classical understandings of capitalism? In this case, I understand I am studying Social Science.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke Research Paper

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Locke’s ideology states that everyone is born equal and that we should live freely. That is to say, Locke favors that we should have constitutional rights of “life, liberty, and property”(1247). Locke’s view on humanity is optimistic. He believes that people will…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays