Free-Will Vs Determinism

Better Essays
12/05/13
Jordan Williams
PHI101
Determinism Versus Free Will

Freedom is an ideal that many people in privileged society take for granted on a daily basis. Just because some people find themselves at home in a country where social norms have evolved to allow a rational sense of individualism and free will within its borders does not concede that free will is a universal right. In fact, many other countries such as Syria struggle to bring their policies up to speed with more progressive democracies such as Spain or the Australia, and their populace suffers backlash from corrupt legal systems and government. However, one thing that these countries stand to learn from successful nations such as the United States is that populations with
…show more content…
It would mark a monumental moment in the history of things, but if it were true, it would not matter very much what happened; all events thereafter would be destined to occur. For this reason and the reason of practicality, it is necessary to view determinism as an abstraction rather than reality. In such a dimension where determinism were held to be true, it would follow from assumption that free will would be merely an illusion. But why then, one would suppose, would humans have evolved to become such complex decision makers? If one believes in an omniscient and omnipotent God, then determinism’s validity seems much more promising, however for all other parties, it seems better left in the realm of abstraction. However, despite its realistic application, determinism remains as essential to philosophical abstraction as does the concept of good and evil. That is one reason it manages to justify itself in the vocabulary of philosophers worldwide -- a broad vocabulary, indeed. Frankfurt happens to be like a Newton or Aristotle of his day and age, postulating truly genius and more importantly original ideas in such a relevant field as his own, A polite way to put it but an apt one as well. It is an inventive mind who decides to venture well beyond the blurred lines of the abstract and metaphysical in order to question an a priori truth so firmly believed to be accurate as the perpendicularity between determinism and free will; it is an inventive mind

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Free-Will Vs Determinism

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The debate between free will vs determinism is important because it reflects on actions and intentions of humans, but free will brings up strong valid points supported by evidence. Free will can be simplified as a human does what they ultimately and truly want in their mind, through their own beliefs and character. Determinism is about having strong influences in an environment, that the decisions of individuals reflect off their unconscious mind. Determinism can influence decisions, but the final decision and action is up to the individual. Through past experiences a person can learn and be influenced by everything in their surroundings, but it does not force a person to make a decision based on their past. I do not believe that anything is…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is it possible to act freely if all of our decisions were already predetermined? This interesting question is connected to the most discussed philosophical question. Every philosopher wants to know, “Do human beings ever act freely?” Incompatibilist and compatibilist have been going back and forth about it for years. Compatibilist believe that determinism and free will can both exist. In this paper, we will define determinism, free will, compatibilism, and incompatiblism. I will show how the incompatibilist are right. I am an incompatibilist because I believe determinism and free will cannot coexist since determinism eradicates free will and the purpose of life.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clearly, the answer to whether we should be responsible for our actions in the society depends on the version of free will we believe in. The definition of free will provided by B.F. Skinner and other hard determinists claim that there is only determinism and no free will. People thought they could choose what they want and do “because they have been conditioned since childhood to want and choose only what they can have and do”(172). The fact that their actions are causally determined by the external environmental factors that are out of control mean no free will and no responsibility. The definition of freedom provided by Hume and other compatibilists supported that free will and determinism can coexist. Hume believed that even if our actions…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism is a controversial topic to free will with multiple theories proving and disproving it. As printed in The Collins Cobuild Learner's Dictionary, determinism is defined as “...the belief that all actions and events result from other actions, events, or situations, so people cannot in fact choose what to do.” Meaning, all life choices are predetermined from the minute we are born, to the minute we die. In contrast, “freewill is an individual taking control and responsibility for his/her actions according to his personal will” (Freewill Verses Determinism). People who believe in Free will, accept the idea that life is not predetermined, and they can independently act however they see fit. Free will and determinism can be further simplified and have multiple differences as well as similarities.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Compatibilism is the perception that loose will and determinism are well-suitable suggestions, and that it is possible to agree with both with no being logically inconsistent. Compatibilists accept as true with freedom may be present or absent in conditions for reasons that don't have anything to do with metaphysics. As an instance, courts of legislation make judgments roughly whether persons are acting beneath their individual free will below detailed circumstances with out bringing in metaphysics. In a similar fashion, political liberty is a non-metaphysical inspiration. Likewise, compatibilists define unfastened will as freedom to behave in keeping with one's determined motives without arbitrary predicament from extraordinary folks or organisations.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stan Lee, creator of many of the Marvel movies, once said, “With great power there must also come… great responsibility.” Free will is like a great power that has been given to us. It can be used for good and evil. As humans, we believe that we have a choice in everything. Thus the idea of free will. But because of that choice there will always be a downside to free will.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that free will is true in saying, the idea that humans can freely choose their actions rather than all our lives being predetermined like the way determinist believe. Determinist think free will is just simply an illusion, and that our thoughts come from our background, and we are unaware as to which we strive no conscious control. As Sam Harris philosopher, claims that our thoughts and desires impose instinctive circumstances that define the character of your consciousness in that moment.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” (Ben Franklin) Do you want to live in a jail? It is really safe in a jail cell, but you have no right so is that what you are asking for? Or do you want things in US to be like how things are in Syria. Back in 1960 Syria was consider a free country, but when Hafez al-Assad ruled Syria he stared saying that we need more safety in this country, so he started passing new laws that weren’t that important. People didn’t pay any attention to what he was doing. They thought it was for the good of the county, but it wasn’t. Laws were passed just to protect the government. Anyone who dares to talk about the government was either thrown in jail or sentenced to death, and that is why Syria is now in a civil war. Did Syria get any safer by passing these law? Like ben franklin said they did not get neither liberty nor…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ayer argues that individuals do possess free will and individuals that make decisions voluntarily should be held responsible for their actions which goes against the theory of determinism and compatibilism. Determinism holds that individuals do not possess free will given that their actions are predetermined which prevents individuals to avoid any actions, therefore making them not morally responsible. On the other hand, compatibilism holds that both determinism and the concept of free will are both compatible and one can be a determinist and also believe in individuals possessing free will. However, Ayer argues that the fact that both of these theories state that individuals have the ability to act otherwise, that in itself demonstrates that…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Q: There are powerful arguments that there is no such thing as free will. But people in ordinary life tend to presuppose there is free will when they talk about people deserving good or bad treatment, rewards and punishments. Some kinds of rewards and punishments encourage good behavior and discourage bad behavior, so those make sense even if there is no free will. But what about punishments for crimes that are impossible to deter (like crimes of passion) or rewarding talents people can’t choose to have (like Olympic medals or Nobel prizes for science)? Do these practices still make sense if there is no free will? If not, how would it make sense to change our institutions?…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism Vs Fatalism

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Determinism and Fatalism are beliefs or, in general, outlooks towards life, between which several variances can be acknowledged. Both of these philosophies hold the view that there is no such thing as a free will and that it is merely a deception. If we think that we are powerless and what is destined - or is our fate - will happen, regardless of we may do we hold an attitude that is referred to as fatalism. On the other hand, those who believe that there is a source of every result and that tomorrow is constructed on what we do today are determinists - or having belief in determinism. Fatalists belittle all human activities, saying that happenings in life are predetermined and whatever is going to happen will happen, regardless. Determinists…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main questions that we face is whether or not, we as humans have genuine freedom. Are we free to make our own choices? Do we decide what happens in our lives in the future? Or are our lives set pathways in which we have no say at all? Are all our choices already decided? In other words, do we have free will or are our actions pre-determined, or both? Hard determinists, libertarians and soft determinists all set out to provide answers to these questions, holding different views on whether or not free will and determinism are compatible. Both hard determinists and libertarians believe that free will and determinism are incompatible but hard determinists reject the idea of free will whereas libertarians support the idea of free will and reject determinism. On the other hand, soft determinists believe that free will and determinism are in fact compatible.…

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To consider the extent to whether free will is compatible with Determinism, you must first think about whether or not we actually possess free will in the first place. A Hard Determinist would say that individuals are not free to act upon anything as it is like a path set up by other natural factors in which we have no control over, this leads to the conclusion that humans are not morally responsible for any action. Any moral decisions we make have causes prior that are uncontrollable. Therefore a Hard Determinist would say that free will and Determinism are not compatible with one another. On the other hand is Libertarianism, with which free will is closely compatible. Philosophers such as Kant, believe that we are completely free meaning that we are morally responsible for every action we take. Between these two extremes stands soft-determinists, such as Hume. These think that most decisions we make are the result of external factors but also we have acted upon free will to make it happen. In fact, they go so far as to say that true freedom requires causation, without this there would be randomness. Therefore free will is completely incompatible with a hard determinist, but a Soft Determinist however would argue that free will must be compatible. So a libertarian approach seems like the most convincing as it implies that we are morally responsible for our actions but takes into account the fact that external factors may have caused this.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fate vs. Freewill

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Reznor, Trent. "Right Where It Belongs." Rec. Sept.-Oct. 2004. With Teeth. Nine Inch Nails. Trent Reznor, 2005. MP3.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free Will is defined as the ability of agents to make choices unconstrained by certain factors. Libertarians believe in free will and recognize that freedom and determinism are incompatible.. The determinist also follow the doctrine of incompatibility.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays