Preview

Free Will Argument

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
160 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Free Will Argument
The problem of evil is sometimes explained as everyone’s free will which was an ability that god gave us as humans on earth. Free will can cause a lot of problems or can be a morally good thing. “Sometimes people with free will decide to cause suffering to others just because they can.”(Boyd). It is they who choose to cause harm god does not decide this for them. The free will argument states that it would be very unreliable for god to prevent evil by limiting free will because there would no longer be any free will everything would have limitations. This explanation does not completely address the problem of evil because some suffering and evil is not a result of choice, but is the result of natural cause or ignorance. The assumption that
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Freedo Paradox Of Omniquate Analysis
    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Freedo Paradox Of Omniquate Analysis

    The proposed solution to be discussed and Mackie’s response to it is the claim that ‘evil is due to human free will’ and as such it cannot be attributed to God. Evil should instead be attributed to the free actions of individuals, the power of which has been endowed upon them by God. While it is acknowledged that there exists evil in the world, as a result of some human free will, it is claimed that freedom of will is a more valuable good than any resultant evil. Through God allowing such freedom, He has satisfied His ‘wholly good’ requirement.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Grace Janizen's Whose Problem Is The Problem Of Evil
    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Grace Janizen's Whose Problem Is The Problem Of Evil

    In Grace Janizen’s “Whose Problem Is the ‘Problem of Evil’”, she points out the philosophers spent too much trying to answer why God created a world with evil in it and not answering more important questions. She starts off by saying that people spend too much on the matter whether good is too God to create a world with evil in it. She also explains the type of people that try to explain evil in the world, the veil of soul-making who believe that evil helps people become a better person. The other type is the free-will defense is God can only do logical things, but a world filled with evil is not very logical. Instead she feels that people should focus on other questions like if God allowed there to evil then should we really try fit those…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Hobbes And John Locke
    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Hobbes And John Locke

    The power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one's own discretion is the official definition of free will. With free will, God gave us the choice to do whatever we want. With the devil tempting us, we are more inclined to choose evil over bad, but with God’s influence we choose good. Plus if humans were naturally evil everything we know about God is a lie. There are people who believe that the bible states that humans are born evil, however, it does not mentions the word evil. The bible states that humans are all born with original sin, the tendency to sin innate in all human beings, held to be inherited from Adam in consequence of the Fall. Because of free will and moral standards we choose what we know is right, deep in our hearts, human beings fear God ,therefore, it is in our nature to please…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Free Will
    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Free Will

    Stan Lee, creator of many of the Marvel movies, once said, “With great power there must also come… great responsibility.” Free will is like a great power that has been given to us. It can be used for good and evil. As humans, we believe that we have a choice in everything. Thus the idea of free will. But because of that choice there will always be a downside to free will.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Free Will And Mill's Argumentative Analysis
    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Free Will And Mill's Argumentative Analysis

    A free thinker forms their own opinions on a variety of topics such as politics and religion, regardless of what society believes. Much like the Enlightenment period, free thinkers rely heavily on scientific inquiry and logical thinking. Many authors, scientists, and researchers alike have analyzed the topic of freethinking; each developing their own opinion on whether they believe society has adopted the concept of freethinking. Sam Harris and John Stuart Mill have joined in on the debate about whether society has actually developed a true sense of freethinking. Two common themes among this debate are biological factors and societal factors, as stated in both Harris and Mill’s literature. After reading the theories that both of these authors have developed, I have determined that, no I do not believe I, nor society, has truly developed a sense of freethinking.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Problem Of Evil Rhetorical Analysis
    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Problem Of Evil Rhetorical Analysis

    Summary: James Rachels addresses the conflicts of evil in his book “Problems from Philosophy” by providing various forms of logical problems. The author points out the different possible explanations to why evil would exist. The first major idea Rachels makes is that perhaps pain is essential to caution people of danger. He goes on to suggest that this would not account for why some people are born with deadly diseases. Another idea he makes is that evil helps people appreciate the good in life. One would not be able to distinguish the good in life if evil did not exist. However, this does not explain why the world needs so much evil to exist, instead of letting a few bad things happen occasionally. The third idea the author makes questions why bad things happen to good people. Rachels suggests maybe those bad things that occur in life are…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Problem of EvilSaint Leo University
    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Problem of EvilSaint Leo University

    Religious folk claim that God is all-benevolent. If this is the case, then why is evil permitted to exist? When faced with this question, believers state that evil exists to promote “the greater good”. The greater good is the idea that some pain and suffering must exist in the world for us as humans to access our second and third level “good” platforms. These levels consist of human qualities such as courageousness, charity and sacrifice. Believers claim that life would not be as good, or as whole, without knowing these feelings, however, I argue that if we never knew any of the “higher level” qualities, then we wouldn’t miss them. If, from the beginning, we only knew the first level good, and knew no pain and suffering, then we wouldn’t know any different. Could it not be a better life, a better world, with absolutely no pain, suffering or evil? So, the question remains, if God is wholly good then how does evil exist? It is possible that God is not completely good, it may be that He permits some evil to exist so we can reach our “greater goods.” On the opposing side of that theory, is it actually that there may not be a God and that evil is a product of our human nature, as well as the good in the world.…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Free Will Vs Determinism Analysis
    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Free Will Vs Determinism Analysis

    It has been recommended by some that humans have the capability of demonstrating free will and mindful choice to be a part of or engage in criminal behaviour. Others have recommended that our behaviour is 'pre-established'. With reference to “AJCSD Criminal Behaviour – Free Will v. Determinism” the document critically analyses the above argument from a phycological perspective with regard to free will and determinism stating that freedom has never been absolute, free will and determinism has been a very important aspect in trying to explain and define causality of criminal behaviour it’s important to note that, free will and determinism polarises psychology and law.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Chapter 13 Essay
    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Chapter 13 Essay

    As I mentioned before religiously I was told the free will defense although I didn’t know it was a philosophy idea as well. There are many different ideas trying to show that both statements are true: There is an omnipotent and omnibenevolent God. And there is evil (Jensen 312). One explanation is that God is limited (Jensen 312). Another is his ways cannot be scrutinized (Jensen 313). Leibniz proposed that a perfect world is not logically possible (Jensen 314). Tennant said that evils are a necessary by-product of nature (Jensen 314). Another idea is that evil is a way to grow as a person a sort of therapy (Jensen 323). Some like John Stuart Mill proposed “radical surgery” by saying that God is not omnipotent (Jensen 311). Alvin Plantinga defended God from being responsible for evil by saying that for moral good to be present humans must be capable of moral evil as well (Jensen 321). My favorite thought in this chapter is from John Hick and his writings on Irenaeus a Christian theologian. Hick suggests that man was created imperfect and immature creature who needed to go through a moral development and growth before his final stage of perfection that was intended for him by the creator. I love this idea because the Bible makes man a sinner who destroyed his perfection and then plunged into sin and misery for the remainder of his existence (Jensen…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Free Will Versus Determinism
    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Free Will Versus Determinism

    The excerpt I chose was “Free Will versus Determinism”, and I noticed from the beginning the piece was written with reasons to support the content. First, the presentation introduces two beliefs; the behavior of atoms is governed entirely by physical law, and humans have free will. Immediately after presenting these ideas and questioning the relations in the two, the excerpt explains the logical approach to why they do not necessarily favor one another. Any argument that is presented, or comparison of two aspects, needs facts and reasons to confirm why the person is trying to convince the reader or other person that the argument is supported.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mackie's Argumentative Analysis
    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mackie's Argumentative Analysis

    What is the Problem of Evil? Is it reasonable to believe a Perfectly Good God, or even a Good God exists if there is suffering in the world?…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Free Will vs Determinism Essay
    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Free Will vs Determinism Essay

    The argument of whether we humans are pre determined to turn out how we are and act the way we do or if we are our own decision makers and have the freedom to choose our paths in life is a long-standing controversy. The ideas of Sartre, Freud, and Darwin are each strong in their own manner, yet Sartre presents the best and most realistic argument as to how we choose our path; we are in control of the things we do and responsible for the decisions we make. Not only this, but also, our decisions have an effect on our peer’s choices, just as theirs affect ours. In this paper, I will argue that Jean-Paul Sartre makes the best argument of the three philosophers in saying we can choose our own path and direction in life because as humans we are consciously aware of what is going on around us and base our decisions on that.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Free Will Research Paper
    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Free Will Research Paper

    In this paper I will argue Sam Harris's opinion on free will is not comprehensive in terms of philosophical view because he does not pay attention on the role played by the spirit level of a person cooperating with the human nerve system; because if there is no such thing as "Free will", we cannot take responsibility of our own action. Whether free will exist is a controversial question philosopher have debated on for many years. Like Sam Harris's opinion that free will is mostly derived from the neurological factors and subconscious, neurologists different from philosophical speculation methods, mainly focus on the experimental way to examine the internal change of brain, the brain of the subject was scanned with brain imaging techniques…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Free Will
    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On Free Will

    If free will did not exist then how does it explain the good in evil in the world. For instance if God knew peoples destiny’s he would have it to where we would all choose to be good and holy as opposed to bad. But, this isn't the case because there is in fact bad out there in the world and the reason is because we as humans were given the right to choose for ourselves. Not only is there free will to choose between right and wrong but there also to love. We have the free will to love anyone we want and as many people as we want. If free will didn't exist then we would only be able to love one person for our life time which again isn't the case because there are so many divorces taking place because people fall out of love with each other. Another example is a prisoner may be said to possess no freedom, however he or she still possesses limited choices. In the very least the imprisoned human has the ability to make some action not determined by the institution whether it be to end his or her life or simply to speak certain words or make a specific eye…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Free Will
    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Free Will

    Hello, you rotten monsters. I'd like to talk to you about objectivity. It's not too common, but every now and then a cuddlefish comes by and insists that we have no right to talk about XKCD because it's all subjective. This is demonstrably false.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics