Free Trade vs Protectionism

One of the greatest international economic debates of all time has been the issue of free trade versus protectionism. Proponents of free trade believe in opening the global market, with as few restrictions on trade as possible. Proponents of protectionism believe in concentrating on the welfare of the domestic economy by limiting the open-market policy of the United States. However, what effects does this policy have for the international market and the other respective countries in this market? The question is not as complex as it may seem. Both sides have strong viewpoints representing their opinions, even the population of the United States is divided when it comes to taking a stand on the issue. After examining all factors on the two conflicting sides, it is clear that the United States should support protectionism. It ensures national welfare and provides several benefits for the American industrial economy. The economy needs to get itself out of the continual deficit hole that it has created for itself, and lean towards protectionist measures. The dictionary definition of free trade states it as a policy of allowing people of one country to buy and sell from other countries without restrictions. This idea originated with the influential British economist, philosopher, and author of The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith. He inspired the writings of great economists such as David Ricardo, Karl Marx, Thomas Malthus, and others. According to Smith, specialization and trade is the best solution to create a flourishing American economy. William H. Peterson, holder of the Lundy Chair of Business Philosophy at Campbell University, agrees with Smith's philosophy. He states that the idea of free trade allows efficient use of economic resources and will promote international cooperation.
One of the biggest examples of international cooperation is the Bretton Woods system that originated from a 1944 conference at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. Those