Frankenstein: Should The Consequences Of Endangering The World Or Society Be Worth It?

In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley tells a ghastly narrative of horrendous ramifications when man exceeds the boundaries of life, and manipulates nature itself. The young scientist plays God while learning the consequences of creating life, and the potential of permanent damage it can conflict on others. Mary Shelley, in her young adulthood, challenges both society and the individual to ponder the eternal question of whether being able to do something gives us the right to do it. Just because we have the potential to break science, and play the role of God; Should the consequences of endangering the world or society be worth it?
The creation of life itself is always a decision couples will soon eventually make. Most individuals know whether they are ready to reproduce, or bear a child. This decision is a big influence we as a society face for the rest of eternity. In the book, Victor knows he wants to create life, and after his success he comes to realize he doesn't want his creation. Why? Because he was ugly, or didn’t meet his expectations? It could just be the fact that Victor was ignorant in his making, and was not ready for the responsibilities he set himself up for.
This ties to the same issues society has
Members from the LGBT community are protesting over this “new racism”. Transgender men and women want to be able to use any bathroom they like and if they can’t, they want to have same sex restrooms. Many would argue this is a convoluted subject that no one can’t really determine what is right or wrong. A question to consider for same sex restrooms is, why is the comfort of people in public restrooms privileged over others? While people from the opposing side are question the rape of women and children because a minority of people want to feel comfortable in non-gender