Preview

Frankenstein Comparative

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1148 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Frankenstein Comparative
Critically compare the text of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein with the 1994 film of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, directed by Kenneth Branagh (Tristar).

Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, is considered one of the greatest literary works of the Romantic period. It is a tale of a man creating a monster, who then rejects it. Frankenstein, for decades, has been viewed as a horrific monster, but now, having studied both film and novel by Mary Shelley, and the author herself, I can see that the creature is not a monster, but is almost childlike. Having taken an immediate interest to the particular scene of “The Creation” of the creature, I have decided to focus solely on that chapter for my comparative. The main difference I noticed from my first time viewing was the drama throughout the scene in the film, and lack of description, where as it is the opposite in the novel. The film adaptation has twists and turns and added small changes here and there to keep the audience interested, where as the actual novel focuses mainly on the descriptive aspects on the creature. Shelley has Dr. Frankenstein giving every detail of the creation from his “yellow skin” to his “shrivelled complexion and straight black lips”. In the film, we have Branagh running around in his great fitness, swinging this great metal tub around his lab, with electric eels and loud, sharp music. It is focused on the appearance and drama, more so than the description. Another difference I noticed from novel to film was the state that Dr. Frankenstein was in. Shelley has him describing himself of having “worked hard for nearly two years [...] deprived myself of rest and health”. The film adaptation of this is completely opposite to what the novel describes. Kenneth Branagh who both directed and starred in the film is in excellent shape. He is well built and energized and excitable. After the creature has burst out from the metal container, he and Dr. Frankenstein have a struggle on the floor,



References: Film Adaptation and Its Discontents-Leitch, Thomas. Baltimore, The John Hopkings University Press, 2007 Frankenstein (1931), Whale, James and Balderston, John. L, based on the compositon by Shelley, Mary Mary Shelley, Spark, Muriel, Plume; First Edition, 1988

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In what ways does a comparative study accentuate the distinctive contexts of Frankenstein and Blade Runner:…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This close reading is about a passage derived from the Letters in the beginning of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. This extract was chosen because it acts as a good preface to what the remaining novel will be about. It serves as an introductory passage that builds suspense and interest; marking the first instance that the book begins to hint at the plot’s main intentions. The overall mood it conveys is one of intrigue. It skirts on the edges of the central conflict of the novel, leaving the reader absorbed and eager to discover what will occur next. The language used to express the characters’ endeavors in this passage is expertly crafted and its precise word usage accurately portrays the novel’s overall intent.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Frankenstein book was a little long to read and not very interesting to me. The pictures were good to have to somewhat visualize what was going on, but otherwise the book was a waste of time to me. I could never really get into it very much making it difficult for me to read it without getting bored of it. We also just finished the movie today with Carrie Fisher which was weird not seeing her shooting a blaster at storm troopers, but that is beside the point. It did not follow the book that we read at all. There were very few similarities to the book and it was confusing putting the two together. Victor did not travel around when he got depressed, but instead he went and hid in his laboratory. Henry Clerval in the movie did not look…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A book originally made as a simple challenge, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein has grown into a thought-provoking novel that plays with the issues of every day life. So thought-provoking, that it has gone down as one of the most treasured books of the modern era. Shelley portrays various themes through the characters of the novel that not only provide a gripping read, but also a look on how life is today. With the use of the Creature, Victor Frankenstein, and Robert Walton, Shelley brought each of these themes to life on the pages. The risk of seeking knowledge, the pains of alienation, and the fervor of revenge are the three main themes that I caught in Frankenstein.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The portrayal of the creatures in both films could be another reason why viewers prefer Young Frankenstein over the original Frankenstein. In Shelley's film, the monster is composed of a number of decomposed dead bodies and was large in size. Both don't know much about humans and…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, and J. Paul Hunter. Frankenstein: The 1818 text, contexts, nineteenth-century responses, modern criticism. New York: W.W. Norton, 1996.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The monster in the novel Frankenstein differs from the monster Grendel in many ways for example: the point of view of the characters, how the monsters were created, and finally the fate of the monsters. However none of these things make one monster better than the other. Each monster had their own hardships in their novels and how can one hardship be put before another.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Mrs. McCourt first said that Prometheus and Frankenstein are related, I found it hard to believe because I didn’t see any obvious connections. However when I re-watched the movie while thinking about the themes and characters of Frankenstein, I saw many similarities despite that surprised me!…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Altogether, the plot adapted from of Marry Shelley ‘Frankenstein’ holds some truth to the book. Still, what the director did change is a pleasant twist to an age old classic. Furthermore, the acting was neither horrendous nor exquisite I found nothing wrong with how the actors portrayed the character. Finally, the feel of the movie coincides very well with the dark tale of a man trying to play god but…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After years of medical training, Tania Frankenstein (Rosalba Neri) returns to her ancestral home, eager to assist her father, the Baron (Joseph Cotten), in his most recent experiment. With the help of his crippled friend (and longtime lab assistant) Charles (Paul Muller), the Baron is ready to prove to the world that, under the right circumstances, dead tissue can be reanimated. Using cadavers that he purchased from Lynch (Herbert Fux), a professional grave robber, the Baron does, indeed, build a man out of spare parts and bring him to life. Unfortunately, his creation is a hideous monster (Peter Whiteman) that, after murdering the Baron, escapes into the nearby woods.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hollywood has managed to reeducate the world of the timeless and classic literature by altering the story to the point beyond recognition. Starting back with 1931 Frankenstein, where producers took a simple strategy and altered the theme of the story in a way they thought audiences would enjoy more. An ambitious man of science that tries to play a god by creating a man of his own vision. The sequel followed in 1935 named The Bride of Frankenstein, which took off even farther form the original novel by introducing audiences to the author Mary Shelly, and her husband Percy.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The novel Frankenstein was written by Mary Shelley in 1818. This gothic romance novel tells the story of a philosopher who discovered how to create life, without the full knowledge that his actions could cause grave consequences. Universal Studios made the film version of this novel in 1931. Unfortunately, the film version of Frankenstein has more differences than similarities to the novel. In the novel, Victor’s mental obsession seems to be more severe than in the film. The character of Victor Frankenstein was portrayed in both the novel and the film as a veriphobe, or one who is afraid of the truth, in this case, the truth of his actions. He thankfully realizes that the monster he created is horrible and needs to be stopped.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Bann, Stephen. Frankenstein, Creation and Monstrosity. Bronfen, Elisabeth. Rewriting Family: Mary Shelley 's ‘Frankenstein ' in its Biological/Textual Context. Journal 1, Volume 1. Reaktion Books. 1994…

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein is a Gothic novel that contains two genres, science fiction and Gothicism. The novel is a first person narrative that uses a framing technique, where a story is told within a story. Shelley gives the book a distinctive gothic mood tone by the use of her chosen setting which is dark and gloomy, by doing this it reflects the hideousness of the creature; the point of views helps towards the realism of the novel; and characterization able the reader to interact with the characters and feel sympathy or hatred towards each one. To entice the readers into her suspenseful novel Shelley uses foreshadowing. The narrative structure shows a wide range of perspectives rather than just one, by doing this it provides the reader with greater insight of the characters personalities. Symbolism and imagery evokes the readers’ emotions where sympathy is concerned. Shelley has entwined these techniques to produce a novel where the readers’ sympathy jumps from character to character and moral judgements are made due to the characters actions.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 19th century reader of the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley was treated to a tale of fantastic proportions. A story of a monster that was created from parts of corpses and could be brought to life would have been an extremely scary story. They would not know if the creation of a monster in this way was really a scientific possibility. The 21st century audience however, now knows that this is not scientifically possible. The fear that was struck in the hearts of the 19th century reader by this monster is now gone. With this in mind the story of Frankenstein now has to be altered to conjure the same fear in our current society of that which existed in the hearts of the original audience. In Hollywood's remakes of the original novel the monster is not the same monster as was in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Hollywood has used aesthetics, science and dehumanization of the monster to turn the story of Frankenstein into movies that would reflect our current society. This essay will strive to draw connections from the original text, empirical research and Hollywood's modern day film remakes of Frankenstein to demonstrate how the monster has been changed and turned into a monster that our society can understand.…

    • 2723 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics