“A deeper understanding of disruption and identity emerges from considering the parallels between Frankenstein and Blade Runner.”
Compare how these texts explore disruption and identity.
Frankenstein and BladeRunner both explore disruption and identity through the creators who have created life unethically and through the characters who were created and were abandoned. Shelley and Scott present the responder with a disrupted world where the relationships between nature and science and creator and created reflect disruption and identity. Despite being composed in differing contexts, when considered and compared together the meaning portrayed through these relationships are amplified through their distinct correlation to each other.
Mary Shelley presents a sense of disruption through the 19th century world of Dr. Victor Frankenstein in which it presents an imbalance between science and nature. This is advocated through the character of Victor, the God like creator whom extends his research of Promethean life beyond the boundary set by nature for personal egotism. Shelley being a Romanticist and writing this text as a precautionary tale to the society of her time during the Industrial revolution highlighted the issue of a disrupted society as a due cause of unethical scientifical research. Frankenstein clearly illustrates this such disruption through the frequent use of pejorative descriptive language to describe the monster which in itself symbolises science and technology; “the beauty of the dream vanished and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart,” and “hideously deformed and loathsome”. The text becomes an extended metaphor which elucidates the possible consequences of science expanding beyond moral boundaries, however on a personal scale, as seen through the death of Dr. Victor Frankenstein’s family. This created the message of a disruption of human dominance if science was to be taken beyond certain limitations. The personal reflection of...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document