Preview

Fourth Amendment Pros And Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
446 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fourth Amendment Pros And Cons
As of today, the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment remains fair. The U.S, Constitution’s Fourth Amendment protects personal privacy and the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. Full body scans at airports are reasonable because of what has happened with terrorism in the U.S. in the past. Failing to carry out a warrant correctly results in consequences.

The Fourth Amendment protects the people’s safety and rights. It protects people because if a person gets searched with probable cause, a warrant, etc. and the police finds a weapon the person was planning to use to hurt someone, the well-being of the people around has been protected. As long as there is probable cause or a warrant to search, physical apprehension is acceptable.
…show more content…
“TSA says the scanners add another layer of security at checkpoints besides metal detectors, explosives-detection systems and bomb-sniffing dogs” (Jansen). What that is saying is that the scanners check for things that metal detectors, explosive-detection systems and bomb-sniffing dogs might not be able to find. “The threats the machines could have detected include the shoe bomb Richard Reid attempted to detonate, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab’s underwear bomb, and two non-metallic explosives in Yemen printer cartridges” (Jansen). Full body scans are just another way to ensure the safety of others.

Failing to carry out a search warrant properly can have harmful consequences to the case. “Failing to pay attention to the details of properly writing and executing a warrant can have devastating consequences for a case” (Henning). If a warrant is carried out incorrectly it can harm a case because the evidence found can potentially be unable to be used in the trial. “Failure to reference the suspected crimes would alone be enough to render the warrants insufficiently particularlized” (Henning). That means that the warrant would be lacking specificity if the suspected crimes were not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    case study

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Supreme Court Decision: The search was unreasonable under the 4th and 14th amendments. In arresting officer may search only the area “within the immediate control" of the person arrested, meaning the area from which he might gain possession of a weapon or destructible evidence. Any other search of the surrounding area requires a search warrant.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 4th Amendment is a security blanket for those who were wrongfully suspected of being guilty. The Amendment states that one is safe in their own house, with their own property until the authority can provide a warrant. So where was the 4th Amendment when the Japanese were pushed out of their homes and into internment camps? The words of a man who experienced this atrocity first hand, George Takei, only further proves that the Japanese were denied this Amendment, “[American soldiers] stomped up the front porch and banged on the door. My father answered it, and the soldiers ordered us out of our home.” Pertaining to the 4th Amendment, the soldiers should have had a warrant, or at least an explanation to give to the family before telling them…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Our forefathers with great fortitude put together a document that would be forever known as the constitution. This document addressed the rights of the citizens of the newly formed states. One amendment has been a focal point of discussion in recent weeks with the leakage of NSA protocol. The fourth amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place…

    • 2530 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A critical point to be noted is that the Fourth Amendment only applies to government action, which includes deputized individuals or those acting at the direction/behest of law enforcement. Additionally, the Fourth Amendment requires not only an actual expectation of privacy, but also, a societally recognized, reasonable expectation of privacy in the place or area searched.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment states that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Peak, 2006)."…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fourth amendment protects citizens of the United States from unlawful searches and seizures conducted by police officers or law enforcement agencies. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution affirms: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”The fourth amendment protects searches that happens when a government official contravene with one's expectation of privacy. Another thing that the fourth amendment protects are seizures’. For a seizure police would conduct communication to a reasonable person. Terry v. Ohio case first took place on…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The good-faith exception-any evidence gained by law enforcement using a search warrant…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment is the most prolific source of constitutional litigation in American history, particularly with application to the states after its incorporation through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. All the arrest that are made has to do with the fourth amendment, so that is something that has a big part in the arrests being made. Every search or seizures that are made by teachers, probation officers, police, airport security, or even a crossing guard are dealing with the fourth amendment. The Fourth Amendment is the constitutional sentry whenever someone's privacy is diminished by a governmental search or seizure. This protects them unless there is a reasonable suspicion or if there is a warrant. The Court declares,…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Considering that these flaws can work in two ways, it's hard to conduct a decent search on someone with the time it takes to get a warrant. Whether they get rid of the drugs or they just didn’t have them in the first place, this can make the police look bad either way. If the person who clearly had drugs…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment protects the rights of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and the right to petition the Government. These rights are some of the most important rights granted to Americans. Some may argue that the First Amendment is too protective of our rights. I tend to disagree; I think in order for our country to have a written explanation of what is or isn't protected the First Amendment gets the points across precisely.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An influential government philosopher John Locke once stated, “Government has no other end , but the preservation of property.” The 4th amendment has an important part of protecting essential values. 4th amendment allows people to be secured in persons, houses, ext.Unless an issued search warrant ,probable cause or reasonable suspicion. For instance a precedent is Katz v Ohio this shows that the government can go too far with their search and seizure procedure.Today there are many cases in which the government is not using a search warrant when they are searching someone. Another reason is the writs of assistance case which established that the government does not take into consideration the 4th amendment for years the colonies got their ships searched and they were ran over by the government until the 4th amendment became a bill of right. How they established this case is they searched a ship for smuggled goods. I think that this is too far because they shouldn't be able to…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    · The Fourth Amendment protects American citizens’ “houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” This means that if a government official or police officer wants to search your person or your property, he/she cannot do so without a judicial warrant and/or probable cause.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Protection from improbable search and seizure is something the Fourth Amendment ensures, and while this can be beneficial to people who want their privacy, it can also prevent law enforcement from collecting evidence that is critical for cases. As mentioned before, the FISA Amendment Act has been playing a big part in proving whether or not the Fourth Amendment is being followed. The Patriot Act amended the FISA Amendment Act which expanded the monitoring of people's metadata such as phone…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A justifiable search could have many factors that would allow an officer to conduct a proper search or make a lawful detention and stops. One of them is a search warrant, which carries a limited authority to detain persons present and also search the property detailed on the warrant. Another is a criminal profile; an example would be of a drug dealer that would fit the physical description given to the officer. Anonymous tip, multiple informant’s, an example is like two or more persons able to identify someone that has committed a crime, and of course police observation. However if the officer sees something suspicious he/she has to articulate why such person has broken the law and given him/her probable cause to do a warrantless search or detention on such said person. Scope falls in the actual process of the search, meaning that you could only reasonably search with in the search area, an example that my teacher Mr. Enos discussed in class, was if your searching for alcohol in a vehicle then you could only search were alcohol could be reasonably hidden inside a car. Place refers to a public or private area, an…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Airport Screenings

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Multiple travelers say that TSA screeners violate the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure making plane trips more unpleasant. Violating the passengers’ privacy, since the scanners produce X-ray images of virtually naked bodies; a virtual strip search. Despite claims of “blurry and opaque images” they can in fact have the potential to become detailed images. This could potentially make the security process a humiliating experience and discourage some people from air travel. If passengers do not want to go through the scanner, they may consent to a full-body pat-down. Where they may be asked to loosen or take off some clothing or be refused entry on the plane if they do not comply.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays