Preview

Foreign Aid Benefits

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1124 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Foreign Aid Benefits
The average American lives on $140 a day compared to 80% of the population of the world living on less than $10 a day (Alters). There is definitely a need for foreign aid. Even though some people think foreign aid is near useless because money given doesn't last long, letting people suffer is wrong, the price of not helping is way greater than the results of not helping, and all arguments are basically made void if people think about how helping is great if it even only makes one person’s life better.
First off, the moral obligation is to help. A good parable about people's moral obligation is as follows, “The way passes by a shallow pond… on my way, I notice a small child has fallen in and is in danger of drowning. Would anyone deny that
…show more content…
Wouldn't anyone want help in a bad situation? Peter Singer brings up an excellent set of points. First, ”If we can prevent something bad without sacrificing anything of significant importance, we ought to do it.” Second, ”Absolute poverty is bad.” Third, ”There is absolute poverty we can prevent without sacrificing anything of moral significance.” In conclusion, “We ought to prevent some absolute poverty”(345). It makes perfect sense that if it doesn't cost us more than it's helping, we should help people who are not as lucky as us. It says in the United Nation’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights, that “Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security of person.” Being born into a life that …show more content…
Rich countries are giving at most 2.1% of their gross national product compared to 8.5% spent on alcohol and tobacco (344). Even with the minimal donations, the percentage of the population living on less than $1.25 a day has gone down for all countries in the last 14 years, up to 60% in East and Asia Pacific (Alters). Of course, most of that is from just the world evolving, not the efforts of foreign aid, but foreign aid does help. Eight hundred million people live in absolute poverty (Singer 344). That is so many people that need help, that some people don't feel like it's even worth trying. There is a story from one of the leaders of my church about a man that walked down a beach covered with starfish that had been beached because of a storm. The man would chuck the starfish into the ocean, saving one at a time, but not enough to actually make a difference in the starfish population (Haight). But it doesn’t really matter, the world will never be perfect, at least you're helping or even saving a life. Imagine if that lie was yours. Just like the story with the kid in the pool, people might get a little muddy and wet, but that is very insignificant compared to the life of a child (Singer 344). It’s the same thing with rich nations helping poor ones. It might be a tiny bit uncomfortable, but not saving the child(or the people in need), would be wrong. Also, imagine the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In fact, foreign aid agencies do wonderful humanitarian work to help people around the world. However, their system that they use has flaws. Too often optimists attribute failures in development and economic growth to a lack of donations. Professor and Humanitarian, Jeffrey Sachs, in his book The End of Poverty points out the apparent failure of the United States regarding the government’s goal to donate 0.5% of its GDP towards foreign aid. While his data at first appears to show the United States and other developed countries’ failure to reach 0.5% of their GDP, Sachs does not account for inflation in which the value of money changes with supply and demand over time. He also fails to refer to what currency his data uses whether the graph uses USD or the Euro, which affects the amount needed to reach 0.5% due to the difference in value of different currencies. Sachs’s deceptive statistics creates the illusion that developed countries refuse to offer enough money to make changes. The U.S. along with Germany, France, Italy, and other top donors for foreign aid actually donate more money each year despite the slow or decreasing GDP growth (see in figure 4). By using manipulative data, optimistic authors such as Sachs do not account for complex factors including inflation and immediately turn blame towards a lack of money and paint the image of crass developed…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article, “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, philosopher Peter Singer observes that that there are millions of people around the world who are leading misery lives and suffering death, because of famine , war, lack of shelter, and adequate medical care. He states that although rich nations have contributed great sums of money for these causes, they are still not giving enough in comparison to their Gross National Product (GNP). He points out that many nations only contributes about one percent of their GNP.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would agree that, “If you can prevent something bad from happening at a comparatively small cost to yourself, you are obligated to do so.” Peter Singer is a philosopher who believes that we have an obligation to help those in need. I agree with his statement from the book Exploring Ethics that, “It is not beyond capacity of the richer nations to give enough assistance to reduce any further suffering to very small proportions.”(Singer pg.244 ) He believes that rich nations can help either as individuals or as a group, to prevent those less fortunate from starvation and reduce their misery without sacrificing anything of comparable significance. He describes comparable significance as “without causing anything else comparably bad to happen,…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” he argues that when people abroad are suffering or dying from lack of food, shelter or medicine, it is wrong for people here to spend money on morally unimportant things rather than giving money to help (Hughes). This means that we have a moral obligation to do what we can to alleviate the stress of poverty abroad if it does not do any harm to us helping them. If we are able to benefit people abroad, we should do so. Food, shelter, and quality healthcare are things that should be seen as basic necessities; therefore, not only do we have a moral obligation to help those abroad in need, but we should also have the want to help those in need. Although Singer asserts this claim, he does identify…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In most nations where poverty is wide spread, the lack of funding from the nation’s government and the global community is almost always a major obstacle. Money is considered a language of its own; everybody understands it and will use it. Major components that can help people get out of poverty needs to be paid. But often the government of the developing nation spends so much money on welfare programs and food distribution programs that they have no money left over to try to pull the country out of poverty. That means the government cannot afford things like teachers and schools to educate their citizens, doctors and hospitals to combat the spread of disease, better farming equipment to increase the food supply, and much more.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While I am not saying that giving to the less fortunate is wrong or those who are at disadvantages because of uncontrollable circumstances should not be given an opportunity to help themselves, I am stating my beliefs that the so-called “Great Society” has not been effective in the reduction of poverty and in many cases may actually be contributing to the continuance of people living in poverty.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper I will argue that we, citizens in rich countries, have a moral obligation to donate most of our wealth to poor countries. In “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, Singer, a utilitarian, argues, “The way people in relatively rich countries react to a situation like that in Bengal cannot be justified; indeed, the whole way we look at moral issues-our moral conceptual scheme needs to be altered, and with it, the way of life that has come to be taken for granted in our society”. (230).“Suffering and death from the lack of food, shelter and, medical care are bad”. (231) One should help others, without sacrificing anything of comparable importance. Giving money to worldwide aid will not cause people to be sacrificing anything of similar…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” written by Peter Singer, Singer’s goal is to convince people that our decisions and actions can prevent other countries from suffering. He suggests that people should do what is morally right by contributing financially to aid those who are starving, rather than purchasing “wants” for those who can afford it. Singer argues his position, provides counter-arguments, and explains his concepts for aiding countries in need.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For as long as humans have lived on this earth, we have found a need to help other humans that are less fortunate than us. From the reign of Augustus in the Roman Empire, to today’s controversial welfare policies in the United States, history has recorded the charitable actions of society to provide for those that cannot provide for themselves. The United States has always practiced some sort of welfare policy since the beginning of colonial times. When the colonists migrated to the future United States from England, they brought with them a set of welfare policies known as the British Poor Laws. Under these laws, citizens who had health problems that prevented work were given cash or alternative forms of assistance from the government. Citizens who were healthy but out of work were given public service work. Today those “poor laws”…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that many people around the world are suffering due to lack of resources within their countries? Some wealthier people and nations decide not to help these less fortunate people as they would rather spend money on frivolous things and think that it’s not their obligation. I believe that man has a moral obligation to help those less fortunate than him, though I believe that it is not morally right to only help those who are less fortunate just to make you feel like a better person.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America should help the poor in it’s own country instead of the poor in other countries. We have homeless and starving in our streets too, that need to be helped.We are in gigantic debt that is getting bigger and bigger everyday and probably won’t ever diminish. Other countries are countries so what’s wrong with them helping themselves.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Inequality

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    People struggle to survive every day in poverty. People who are less fortunate do not feel like they have freedom of justice. A lot of the people in our society just simply do not care about the people who are in need. Of course we do have our churches and charities who lend a helping hand, but what about the people who are not necessarily poor, like the orphanages or women's shelters. In a worldly view we have children who are not able to attend school and people who cannot work so they cannot provide for their families. A lot of third world countries are poor due to their corrupt governments who take from them and do not give back. Americans are spoiled. Some of us even suffer from obesity. We tend to take advantage of just how great the American lifestyle is, being able to work, go to school, have fresh clean water and food available etc. For those who are less fortunate here in America there is hope because we have a government that provides for them, versus those who do not have helpful government. To end hunger and poverty, I believe that people must simply care ENOUGH to REALLY HELP those in need. If everyone cared about their less fortunate neighbor and really helped them to the best of their ability, then they would be free from the binds of poverty. Throughout history, Greed has driven people to evil and hatred because the love of money is the root of all evil. “Every man must decide whether he will walk in the light of creative altruism or in the darkness of destructive…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Island of Plenty

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The United States has enough food to supply Americans but not enough to feed the whole world. According to Montgomery “We should not take responsibility for all humanity” (399). Why should the United States help those that aren’t taking responsibility for their own actions? If Americans were to give handouts we would risk losing our own resources. I agree the United States needs to first take care of our nation before we can help others. If not then we won’t be left with anything.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How much of the United States federal budget goes to foreign aid? What's your best guess? 10 percent? 15 percent? 20 percent? If you're like most Americans, you probably guessed wrong. Less than 1 percent of the United States federal budget goes to foreign aid. Even though it may seem like a small amount, it really isn't. That less than 1 percent is really over $30 billion that we spend on foreign aid each and every year. That’s a lot of money! And there is still more to foreign aid than the foreign aid budget. There are over 20 U.S. Government agencies responsible for either executing or funding U.S. foreign assistance activities in over 100 countries. 56% of the Kaiser Family Foundation poll respondents thought that the United States spends too much money on foreign aid. Too much money is being given towards foreign aid that could be used towards scientific and technological advancements instead.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the US today we have many resources, and organizations that Americans can reach for when they are in a time of need Some Americans will never reach out towards these "helping hands", but others will if they fall on to hard times. The United States funds many of these welfare programs for just that, the idea of when someone experiences paucity, their country, the people, can help them. There are many programs with welfare institutions such as the Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and the Social Security Disability Income (SDSI); they can help one with a give a stable income to a not so stable situation. Americans can receive things as discounted items, and food stamps if needed. Though in many cases America 's "helping hands" are being abused, by the growing of welfare fraud, (www.newsmax.com ). Some Americans see this "free money" and extract it for all it is worth, while doing so committing fraud, and or disability fraud; in turn hurting the hard working taxpayer, (www.cbpp.com).There is a growing rise of people becoming dependent…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays