BLB 20058 – M – MSTRA- L
MANAGING STRATEGY ASSIGNMENT
WORD COUNT: 3694 WORDS
SCHOOL OF POSTGRADUATE
TECHNOLOGY PARK MALAYSIA
ASIA PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF STAFFORDSHIRE
SHARMILA A/P K. N. SETHUMADHAVAN
Strategy is well explained as the effective use of well laid out plans to achieve success. It is no less of spectacle to attribute strategy to individual achievement, achievement from a company, a country or at the very least a non – financial institute to achieve strategic success. Ford Motor Company has in recent times lost its market share to emerging Asian companies such as Honda, Toyota, Hyundai and Nissan. As a new landscape of economic might surfaces, new car stereotypes are emerging. Finding a place in these segments is proving difficult for Ford Motors and hence need to change its strategies. Hyper-competition combined with tough economic times has pushed Ford to the edge of insolvency. This paper examines the issues that plague the company while using published models to make analysis on how and why the problems occur to better understand their potential impact on the company’s sustainable competitive advantage. Recommendations will seek to give strategic solutions to address the issues identified earlier. This research isn’t structured upon models to identify, analyze and solve issues but rather looks at the core of the problems within Ford Motors and provides models to analyze and solve the issues.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1: STRATEGIC ISSUES AT FORD
Underlying Issues at Ford Motor
SECTION 2: STRATEGIC MODELS AND FRAMEWORK SUITABLE FOR ISSUES IDENTIFIED
Porter’s 5 Forces Analysis
SECTION 3: RECOMMENDATIONS
3.1 Factory and Supply Chain Management
3.2 Product Differentiation
3.3 Expand Asian Market Share while shifting production to Mexico
3.4 Divest Volvo and Prepare for Liquidation of Chrysler and GM
APPENDIX A: COMPANY OVERVIEW
A.2 Business Model and Market Overview
A.3 Strategic Framework of Ford Motor Company:
APPENDIX B: NATURE OF STRATEGIC ISSUES AND HOW THEY RELATE TO FORD’S CURRENT STRATEGIES
APPENDIX C: SWOT AND EXTERNAL ANALYSIS FOR FORD MOTORS
C.2. PORTERS 5 FORCES ANALYSIS
C.3. Balanced Score card For Ford Motor Company
APPENDIX D: STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATION FOR FORD MOTOR
D.1 Strategic Recommendations
Ford Motor Company has had its fair share of success and has positioned itself as a premier U.S brand. But as witnessed by any other company, the lifecycle of Ford has edged towards decline to reflect the realities of the factors that surround the industry in which it operates. In the years following the 2008 financial meltdown, Ford was operating in a comfortable but challenging position in the auto industry, which has since been blemished by the near collapse of the company as a result of global recession. With competition from Asian companies rife and a faltering economy, Ford is left with a huge task of formulating a strategy that will not only sustain its existence in the industry but to put it ahead of competition.
SECTION 1: STRATEGIC ISSUES AT FORD
Recent financial stand of Ford Motor Company has shown improved earnings of around $2,717,000,000 FYE 2009, sales of automotive have seen a significant fall to 4,817,000,000 units sold worldwide, a 13% fall from previous year as shown in Ford (2009) annual report. As the only automobile company not to have been a participant in the TARP program as mentioned by Grant (2010), Ford had narrowly salvaged its position as one of the most powerful brands in automobile industry. Ford faces some pressing strategic issues...
References: Altman G. David and Rego L. 2009 “Expanding opportunity at the base of the pyramid” Center for creative leadership, Grameen foundation Vol. 32/ Issue 2
Ansoff, H. Igor. “A Model for Diversification” Management Science. Vol. 4. No. 4. INFORMS. 1958. pp394-395.
Bedell, Denise. Ford Counters Global Risk. Corporate Finance, London. Iss.197. 2001. pp1-2
Brown L. and Eisenhardt M. K. 1998. “Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos.” Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Carr C. and Collins D. 2011. “Should you have a global strategy?” MIT Sloan Management Review vol. 53 no.1
Christensen M. C. and Overdorf M. 2000. “Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change.” Harvard Business Review 78(2 March-April):66-78.
D’Aveni, A. R. 1994. “Hypercompetiton: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering.” New York: The Free Press.
Ford Motor Company, 2009 Annual Report. Form 10K
Hamel G. 2000. “Leading the revolution” Boston; Harvard Business School Press 2000
Kaplan S. R. and Norton P. D. 1996 “Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy”. California Management Review. Vol. 39. No.1. reprinted by permission of Harvard Business School Press p.54
Khanna T., Song J
Miller L. William and Morris L. 1999. “4th Generation R&D.” New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Porter M. E. 2008. “The Five Competitive Forces that Shape Strategy” Harvard Business Review, January 2008.
Porter M. E. 1990. “The competitive advantages of Nations.” Harvard Business Review
Pries, Ludger, 2001. “The dialectics of automobile assemblers and suppliers restructuring and globalization of the German “Big Three”.” Universitat Des Saarlangdes. Allemagne.
Rayport, Jeffry F. and Sviokla, John J. “Exploiting the virtual value chain.” The Mckinsey Quarterly. No. 1. 1996. pp26-28.
Rumelt, R. 2011. “The perils of bad strategy” McKinsey Quarterly
Slack, N. and Lewis M. 2008. “Operations Strategy; 2nd Edition” FT Prentice Hall, Harlowi
The New York Times, 2008 “Ford Motor Company” Business Day, nytimes.com, New York. [Online] Available from; http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/ford_motor_company/index.html [Accessed 14/12/2011]
Vasilash, Gary S
Figure 2: Fords “One Ford Annual Plan” (Ford Motor Company, 2009 annual report)
Please join StudyMode to read the full document