Preview

Ford Case

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4790 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ford Case
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Antai College of Economics and Management

Corporate Finance Homework

Whoever Pocketed Value From VEP?

Team: Dong Nan 1081209045
Gu Chengzong 1081209020
Li Hongke 1081209050
Lu Linlin 1081209031
Lu Yao 1081209043

March 2009
Abstract
Excessive cash and undervalued stock price forced Ford to conceive an unprecedented cash payout system - Value Enhancement Plan in 2000. For a dual-stock-structure company, this recapitalization did favor much Ford family which held the dominant voting power by giving it larger flexibility, enhanced control with less capital as well as tax benefit and confidence improvement. While the common shareholders may benefit less compared to other alternatives, as like a stock repurchasing plan, given their preferences and different interest to the family. On the other hand, it is not yet sure whether this VEP could really enhance Ford’s value by enhancing public confidence towards company’s future growth, as it already decreases company’s fundamental value due to tax payment. Moreover, from a long run perspective, a highly cyclical company as Ford should have been more prudent in taking strategies. Large cash payout strategy will weaken its immunity to future economical downturn.

Keywords: Value Enhancement Plan, dual-stock-structure, voting power, public confidence enhancement, stock buyback, cash dividend payout.

Main Points Overview * Problems identification: excessive cash and undervalue stock. * Supported by comparison with GM and DaimlerChrysler * Research on VEP and alternative cash payout methods: * From ford family’s point of view, VEP is the best in the way of more flexibility, higher voting power, higher percentage share holding, lower taxes, most positive signaling to the market and so on. * From common shareholders view, we believe people with different preference ranks these methods differently. * Research



References: 1. Allan Sloan, It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time, Sep 2006, Available From:< http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/04/AR2006090401007.html>. 2. Dividend at Ford Is Being Cut in Half, The New York Times, Oct.2001, Available From:<http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/11/business/dividend-at-ford-is-being-cut-in-half.html?n=Top%2FNews%2FBusiness%2FCompanies%2FFord%20Motor%20Company>. 3. Ethan Haskel, The Ultimate Ford Rebate? Jun.2000, Available From:< http://www. fool.com /ddow/2000/ddow000628.htm>. 4. Ford Motor Annual Reports 2003, Available From :< http://www.ford.com/microsites/ annual-reports>. 5. Ford Motor Annual Reports 2007, Available From :< http://www.ford.com/microsites/ annual-reports>. 6. Ford Motor Company Value Enhancement Plan Important U.S. Federal Income Tax Information, Sep.2000, Available From: < http://www. ford.com/about-ford/investor -relations/investment-information/ value-enhancement-plan>. 7. Historical Dividends, Available From :< http://www.ford.com/about-ford/investor -relations/investment-information/dividends-history>. 8. Visteon Corporation Spin-off Basis Alloation Information For Ford Motor Company Shareholders, Jun. 2000, Available From: < http://www.ford.com/about-ford/investor relations/investment-information/visteon-basis-allocations-us>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Dunlap Case

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The compensation package achieved Sunbeam’s goals of maximizing shareholders wealth. It motivated Dunlap to drive up the price of the stock. Although the short term profits benefited shareholders, no incentives to create a long term, profitable company existed. In fact, it gave Dunlap an even bigger incentive to sell the company once the stock price reached a high, favorable value. Dunlap’s compensation package consisted of little to no risk and had a ten year term. The restricted stock rewards became vested in two years. His purchase of 244,898 shares indicated that profits would drastically increase. Dunlap’s compensation package affected thousands of employees at Sunbeam. The compensation package favored shareholders but disfavored employees. They had no value in this model. The compensation package only protected shareholders wealth. The structure of Dunlap’s compensation package was aligned his views of shareholder primacy. He sacrificed values for a boost in stock price and economic efficiency. The stockholders of Sunbeam greatly profited, and Dunlap reaped a majority of the benefits. The compensation package should relate to performance in order to produce the right incentives. The compensation package provided Dunlap with an excessive amount of shares of stock and stock rewards, but at least it provided an…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At that time it was 60 percent of its capital stock of $2 million, but only around 1 percent of its total equity of $114 million. Between 1911 and 1915 Ford paid special dividends totaling $41 million. It was the policy of Ford Motor Company to reduce the selling price of its cars each year. Later in 1915, they increased production by constructing new plants worth $10 million, buying land for $3 million, and erecting an $11 million smelter. To finance these expenditures, Ford did not reduce the selling price. A year later, Ford’s board reduced the selling price of cars by $80 per car. Ford Motor Company was able to produce 600,000 cars annually, doing this they would forfeit $48 million by lowering the price by $80. At the same time the board decided not to pay a special dividend and would reinvest instead, however they did pay the regular dividend of $1.2…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Team D1 Case 3

    • 3739 Words
    • 32 Pages

    The Board must seek a strategy that maximizes capital structure value. Any firm’s capital structure is a mix of debt and equity that maximizes the stock price (Brigham & Ehrhardt, 2014). Entities finance their operations through debt or its own capital. Debt can exist in many forms such as bond issues or long-term notes payable (loans, credit lines, etc.). Capital (or equity) can be stock or retained earnings. The reasons for using various financing options from each category are numerous. One of the leading factors is risk. Nobody wants risk, but without it there can be no reward. Also, it is important to weigh the value of maintaining the firm’s capital (earned interest) versus the cost of debt (interest paid) and figure in the…

    • 3739 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ford continues to prosper as it earns an operating profit of $463 million in 2011 than it did the prior year. Also Ford has released dividend shares to stockholders, which is the first payout since 2006. Ford’s corporate citizenship includes employee volunteering in community projects. Key initiatives that drive the company is: an aggressive restructure to operate profitability at existing demands and changes to a model mix; accelerate a development of new products to which customer’s value; finance a plan to improve the balance sheet; work together as one team that leverages global…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mgt 521 Final Analysis Paper

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The final part of the business analysis will cover the strategic initiatives of Ford Motor Company (Ford), their reaction to the economic trends, company strategies for adapting to changing markets, and tactics to achieve strategic goals. It will also review the operations of their human resources department in helping to achieve business goals as well as give rationale whether or not to invest in Ford. Some of the best practices of Ford are centered on their manufacturing techniques, technology, and environmental awareness. Ford manufactures cost effective, fuel efficient, and environmental…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issue Analysis Paper

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ford Motors is currently facing unfavorable business conditions and in order to survive, it is remodeling itself as a smaller, more flexible and competitive firm. For this the company is slashing 10,000 jobs and closing 2 plants. The company is at present not making a profit and it is hoped that, by taking these actions, the company will once again become profitable by 2009. It is hoping that there will be huge cost savings after layoffs and plant closings. For instance, by offering buyout packages, it aims to reduce $5 billion in operating costs. The company is also looking to make its production more strategic by concentrating on core products and expected best setters.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pivotal Investment

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This represents Ford's concerted efforts to bifurcate into a bi-functional auto and mobility company. Ford will of course maintain its focus on core auto sectors, e.g., manufacturing, designing, marketing, servicing cars like SUVs, trucks and electric…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    A financial analysis of Ford Motor Company’s (Ford) statements will identify their solvency in today’s automobile market. Elements such as liquidity, leverage, profitability, and activity ratios will demonstrate Ford’s financial health and stability. A further assessment of their technological advantages, global strategies, and benchmarking analysis will indicate the future prognosis of this company.…

    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrigley Case

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * By doing a leveraged recapitalization, this would have an impact on share value, debt rating, cost of capital, Earnings Per Share, and voting control.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ford Motor Company Business Plan Submitted to the Senate Banking Committee. (n.d.). Ford Motor Company. Retrieved March 20, 2011, from banking.senate.gov/public/_files/Brfg12308AutoPRESENTATIONOFFORDMOTORCOMPANY122_SenateFinal…

    • 2358 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    This paper will explain GM’s most pressing challenges. Overcapacity is negatively impacted their financial results, brutal international competition is causing GM to react with target costing strategies, rising fuel prices directly impacts their cash flows and complicates capital budgeting strategies and tactics and their ongoing health care and pension costs continue to color their future earning potential.…

    • 3609 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Secondly, the relationship between financialization, shareholder value, fair value accounting, share buy-backs, value creation, value at risk and value absorption will be examined to show how they are all interconnected in the process termed financialization. Further more factors driving the increasing distribution of cash to shareholders by US firms will also be discussed and how all these factors are geared towards achieving one singular goal – the creation of value for the shareholder.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gainesboro Mt

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Swenson chooses to pay out dividends, she must also decide on the magnitude of the payout. A subsidiary question is whether the firm should embark on a campaign of corporate-image advertising and change its corporate name to reflect its new outlook. The case serves a review of the many practical aspects of the dividend and share buyback decisions, including(1) signaling effects, (2) clientele effects, and (3) finance and investment implications of increasing dividend payout and share repurchase decisions.…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    8. Lichtenberg, F. and Siegel, D. (1990). The effects of leveraged buyouts on productivity and related aspects of firm behaviour. Journal of Financial Economics. 9. Lubatkin, M. and Chatterjee, S. (1994). Extending modern portfolio theory into the domain of corporate diversification: Does it apply?. Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp. 109-136. 10. Pinegar, M. and Wilbricht, L. (1989). What Managers Think of Capital Structure Theory: A Survey. Financial Management, Winter, pp. 82-91. 11. Smith, A. (1990). Corporate ownership structure and performance. The case of Management Buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp.143-164. 12. McConnell, J. and Muscarella, C. (1985). Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 14, pp. 399-422. 13. Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. American economic Review 48, June, 261-197. 14. Dividend Smoothing, Agency Costs, and Information Asymmetry: Lessons from the Dividend Policies of Private Firms. 15. Michael S. Rozeff , Growth, Beta and Agency Costs as Determinants of Dividend Payout Ratios, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 249-259, Fall 1982. 16. Smith, A. (1990). Corporate ownership structure and performance. The case of Management Buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp.143-164. 17. Henri Servaes Tobin’s Q and the gain from takeovers: The Journal of Finance • Vol. LXVI, No. 1 • March 1991. 18. Easterbrook (1984): Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends. 19. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Berle and Means. 20. Brealey & Myers on Corporate Finance: Capital Investment and Valuation , Richard A Brealey, Stewart C Myers. 21. The Black (1976) effect and cross market arbitrage in FTSE-100 index futures and options.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Country Report Indial

    • 3498 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Prior to the formation of the Autolatina JV, both VW and Ford had long been investors in Argentina and Brazil. Both companies had major vehicle-manufacturing subsidiaries in the two countries. Each of these subsidiaries, in turn, had a number of subsidiaries of its own, engaged in financing or in component manufacturing. By 1985, Ford and VW operations both had something in common: they were doing poorly financially in a bad economic environment.…

    • 3498 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics